Skip to main content

Comparison of transfers for natural radionuclides (238U, 234Th, 226Ra, 210Pb & 210Po) from five different soils to four different barley genotypes

Abstract

Transfer Factors (Fv) of 238U, 226Ra, 234Th, 210Po and 210Pb from five different agricultural soils in semi-arid region (Syria) to four different barley genotypes were studied in an agricultural potted experiment. The geometric mean of the Fv values were (0.08) for 210Pb, and (0.02) for 210Po, while it ranged from 0.18 to 0.42 ,from 0.08 to 0.15 and from 0.22 to 0.4 for 238U, 234Th and 226Ra, respectevily. The Fv values of 238U and 226Ra were within the recommended global medians, while the Fv values of 234Th, 210Pb and 210Po were higher. There is no clear relationship between the soil properties and Fv of all studied radionuclides to barley genotypes. Moreover, the expression of glutathione (GSH) gene, which is belived to be involoved in heavy metal removal was generally low in all studied varieties grown in all soil types.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Pulhani VA, Dafauti S, Hegde AG, Sharma RM, Mishra UC (2005) Uptake and Distribution of Natural Radioactivity in Wheat Plants From Soil. J Environ Radioact79:331–346

    Google Scholar 

  2. IAEA (2010) Radiation Protection and the Management of Radioactive Waste in the Oil and Gas Industry. Training Course Series No. 40, IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  3. IAEA (2013) Radiation Protection and Management of Norm Residues in the Phosphate Industry. Safety Reports Series No. 78, IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  4. Al Attar L, Doubal W, Al Abdullah J, Khalily H, Abdul Ghani B, Safia B (2014) Characterization of NORM Solid Waste Produced from the Petroleum Industry. Environ Technol 36:1104–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Othman I, Al-Masri MS (2002) Characterization of NORM contaminated sites at the Syrian Oilfield: sampling, analysis and data management, Conference, February, WM’02: 24–28

  6. Pinel F (2002) 63Ni and 137Cs Chemistry in the Soil-Plant System. École nationale supérieure agronomique de Montpellier, INRA - UMR Sol et Environment, 34- Montpellier (France), Jun, 162 p

  7. IAEA (2014) Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources. International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ansoborlo E, Berard P, Den Auwer C, Leggett R, Menetrier F, Younes A, Montavon G, Moisy P (2012) Review of Chemical and Radiotoxicological Properties of Polonium for Internal Contamination Purposes. Chem Res Toxicol 25:1551–1564

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Missimer TM, Teaf C, Maliva RG, Danley-Thomson A, Covert D, Hegy M (2019) Natural Radiation in the Rocks, Soils, and Groundwater of Southern Florida with a Discussion on Potential Health Impacts. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(10):1793

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hegazy AK, Afifi SY, Alatar AA, Alwathnani HA, Emam MH (2013) Soil Characteristics Influence the Radionuclide Uptake of Different Plant Species. Chem Ecol 29(3):255–269

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saenboonruang K, Phonchanthuek E, Prasandee K (2018) Soil-to-Plant Transfer Factors of Natural Radionuclides (226 Ra and 40 K) in selected Thai medicinal plants. J Environ Radioact 184–185:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baeza A, Guillen J, Mietelski JW, Gaca P (2006) Soil-to-Fungi Transfer of 90Sr, 239+240Pu, and 241Am. RadiochimActa 94:75–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kabata-Pendias A (2011) Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, Fourth edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL. 520 pages

  14. Sekhar KC, Kamala CT, Chary NS, Anjaneyulu Y (2003) Removal of Heavy Metals Using a Plant Biomass With Reference To Environmental Control. Int J Miner Process 68:(1–4):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh A, Prasad SM (2011) Reduction of Heavy Metal Load in Food Chain: Technology Assessment. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technol 10:199–214

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alsabbagh AH, Abuqudaira TM (2017) Phytoremediation of Jordanian Uranium-Rich Soil Using Sunflower.Water, Air, & Soil Pollut219–228

  17. Branzini A, González RS, Zubillaga M (2012) Absorption and Translocation of Copper, Zinc and Chromium by Sesbania virgate. J Environ Manage 102:50–54

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Susarla S, Medina VF, Mccutcheon SC (2002) Phytoremediation: an Ecological Solution to Organic Chemical Contamination. Ecol Eng 18:647–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bennett LE, Burkhead JL, Hale KL, Terry N, Pilon M, Pilon-Smits EAH (2003) Analysis of Transgenic Indian Mustard Plants for Phytoremediation of Metal-Contaminated Mine Tailings. J Env Qual 32:432–440

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Flathman PE, Lanza GR (1998) Phytoremediation: Current Views on an Emerging Green Technology. J Soil Contam 7:415–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prasad MNV, Freitas H (2006) Metal-Tolerant Plants: Biodiversity Prospecting for Phytoremediation Technology. In: Prasad MNV, Sajwan KS, Naidu R (eds) Trace Elements in the Environment. Biogeochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioremediation), CRC, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, pp 483–506

    Google Scholar 

  22. IAEA (2010) Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments. Technical Reports Series No. 472, IAEA, Vienna

  23. Soriano MA, Fereres E (2003) Use of Crops for in situ Phytoremediation of Polluted Soils Following a Toxic Flood from a Mine Spill. Plant Soil 256:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Murillo JM, Marañón T, Cabrer F, López R (1999) Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Sunflower and Sorghum Plants Affected by the Guadiamar spill. Sci Total Environ 242:281–292

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Doty SL, Shang QT, Wilson AM, Tangen J, Westergreen A, Newman LA, Strand SE, Gordon MP (2000) Enhanced Metabolism of Halogenated Hydrocarbons in Transgenic Plants Containing Mammalian P450 2E1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6287–6291

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. González Á, del Gil-Diaz M, del Carmen Lobo M M (2016) J Soils Sediments 17(5):1403–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yadav SK (2010) S Afr J Bot 76:167–179

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Penner GA, Clarke J, Bezte LJ, Leisle D (1995) Genome 38:543–547

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cai Y, Cao FB, Wei K, Zhang GP, Wu FB (2011) Genotypic Dependent Effect of Exogenous Glutathione on Cd-Induced Changes in Proteins, Ultrastructure and Antioxidant Defense Enzymes in Rice Seedlings. J Hazard Mater 192:1056–1066

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li YM, Chaney RL, Schneiter AA, Miller JF (1995) Crop Sci 35:137–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Elgharbawy SS, Abdelhamid MIE, Mansour E, Salem AH (2021) Rapid Screening Wheat Genotypes for Tolerance to Heavy Metals, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64323-2_6

  32. Wu F, Dong J, Chen F, Zhang G (2005) Response of Cadmium Uptake in Different Barley Genotypes to Cadmium Level. J Plant Nutr 28(12):2201–2209

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun H, Cao F, Wang N, Zhang M, Mosaddek Ahmed I, Zhang G, Wu F (2013) Differences in Grain Ultrastructure, Phytochemical and Proteomic Profiles between the Two Contrasting Grain Cd-Accumulation Barley Genotypes. PLoS ONE 8(11):e79158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang Y, Hu Y, Liu Y (2009) Combined Toxicity of Copper and Cadmium to Six Rice Genotypes (Oryza sativa L.). J Environ Sci 21:(5):647–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Syrian Agricultural Statistics Group (2003) http://cbssyr.sy/yearbook/2003/SYR2003A.htm

  36. Al-Masri MS, Amin Y, Khalily H, Al-Masri W, Al-Khateeb Y (2021) Assessment of Natural Radionuclide Transfer Factors and Partition Coefficients in Some Syrian Soils. J Environ Radioact 229–230:106538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Flynn WW (1968) The Determination of low Levels of Polonium-210 in Environmental Materials. Anal ChimActa 43:221–227

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Al-Masri MS, Nashawati A, Al-Akel B, Saaid S (2007) Radium 226 and Uranium Isotopes Simultaneously Determination in Water Samples Using Liquid Scintillation Counter. Atomic Energy Commission of Syria – PR \ RRE, p 186

  39. ACSAD, The Arab Center for the Studies of Arid Zones and Dry Lands (1985)Soil Map of Syria and Lebanon

  40. Shtangeeva I, Ayrault S (2004) Phytoextraction of Thorium from Soil and Water Media. Water Air & Soil Pollut 154:(1–4):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. I. Othman, Director General of the Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, for his valuable assistance and support throughout this work. In addition, the authors would like to thank the workers in the radiological laboratories for their efforts in completing the radiological measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Al-Masri.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Masri, M.S., Arabi, M.I.E., Al-Daoude, A. et al. Comparison of transfers for natural radionuclides (238U, 234Th, 226Ra, 210Pb & 210Po) from five different soils to four different barley genotypes. J Radioanal Nucl Chem (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08357-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08357-3

Keywords

  • Transfer factor
  • Soil
  • Barley
  • Genotype
  • Glutathione