Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction of phosphate groups into metal-organic frameworks to synthesize MIL-101(Cr)-PMIDA for selective adsorption of U(VI)

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) MIL-101(Cr)-PMIDA with phosphate groups were prepared for the adsorption of U(VI). The morphology and structure of the samples were characterized by SEM, TEM, FT-IR, BET, XPS and XRD. This study investigated the effects of the initial U(VI) concentration, contact time, pH, adsorption temperature and coexisting ions on the adsorption of U(VI) by MIL-101(Cr)-PMIDA. The experimental results showed that the adsorption capacity of MIL-101(Cr)-PMIDA was 267.92 mg g−1 at C0 (U) = 40 mg L−1, pH = 6.0 and T = 298 K, which was much higher than that of MIL-101(Cr)-NH2 (71.10 mg g−1). More importantly, the material exhibited excellent selective removal performance for U(VI) in an aqueous solution. Furthermore, adsorption thermodynamics and kinetic studies showed that the adsorption was spontaneous (∆G < 0) and exothermic (∆H ˃ 0), following the pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 > 0.99).

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang W, Bai ZQ, Shi WQ, Yuan LY, Tian T, Chai ZF, Wang H, Sun ZM (2013) MOF-76: from a luminescent probe to highly efficient U(VI) sorption material. Chem Commun (Camb) 49(88):10415–10417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiong J, Fan Y, Luo F (2020) Grafting functional groups in metal-organic frameworks for U(VI) sorption from aqueous solutions. Dalton Trans 49(36):12536–12545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yin N, Ai Y, Xu Y, Ouyang Y, Yang P (2020) Preparation of magnetic biomass-carbon aerogel and its application for adsorption of uranium(VI). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 326(2):1307–1321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang S, Pang H, Li L, Jiang S, Wen T, Zhuang L, Hu B, Wang X (2018) Unexpected ultrafast and high adsorption of U(VI) and Eu(III) from solution using porous Al2O3 microspheres derived from MIL-53. Chem Eng J 353:157–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng Y, Sun X, Liao X, Shi B (2011) Adsorptive recovery of uranium from nuclear fuel industrial wastewater by titanium loaded collagen fiber. Chin J Chem Eng 19(4):592–597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Acharya R, Parida K (2020) A review on adsorptive remediation of Cr (VI) by magnetic iron oxides and their modified forms. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 10(2):5266–5272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Prakash Tripathy S, Acharya R, Das M, Acharya R, Parida K (2020) Adsorptive remediation of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution using cobalt ferrite: Kinetics and isotherm studies. Mater Today: Proceed 30:289–293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Acharya R, Naik B, Parida K (2018) Cr(VI) remediation from aqueous environment through modified-TiO2-mediated photocatalytic reduction. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 9:1448–1470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Acharya R, Lenka A, Parida K (2021) Magnetite modified amino group based polymer nanocomposites towards efficient adsorptive detoxification of aqueous Cr (VI): A review. J Mol Liq 337:116487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Manos MJ, Kanatzidis MG (2012) Layered metal sulfides capture uranium from seawater. J Am Chem Soc 134(39):16441–16446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Farjana SH, Huda N, Mahmud MAP, Lang C (2018) Comparative life-cycle assessment of uranium extraction processes. J Clean Prod 202:666–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang N, Xing Y-H, Bai F-Y (2020) Triazine functionalized porous three-dimensional uranyl-organic framework: extraction of uranium(VI) and adsorption of cationic dyes in aqueous solution. Cryst Growth Des 20(3):1838–1848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tavakoli H, Sepehrian H, Semnani F, Samadfam M (2013) Recovery of uranium from UCF liquid waste by anion exchange resin CG-400: breakthrough curves, elution behavior and modeling studies. Ann Nucl Energy 54:149–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fu F, Xie L, Tang B, Wang Q, Jiang S (2012) Application of a novel strategy-Advanced Fenton-chemical precipitation to the treatment of strong stability chelated heavy metal containing wastewater. Chem Eng J 189–190:283–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pu Y-q, Xiao F, He S, Wang C, Peng G-w, Liu Y (2017) Synthesis of the p-tert-butyl calix[4] arene symmetrical sulfide derivatives and its extraction properties towards U(VI) from aqueous solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 314(3):2137–2143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shuibo X, Chun Z, Xinghuo Z, Jing Y, Xiaojian Z, Jingsong W (2009) Removal of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution by adsorption of hematite. J Environ Radioact 100(2):162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xie Y, Chen C, Ren X, Wang X, Wang H, Wang X (2019) Emerging natural and tailored materials for uranium-contaminated water treatment and environmental remediation. Prog Mater Sci 103:180–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Acharya R, Naik B, and Parida KM (2018) Adsorption of Cr (VI) and textile dyes on to mesoporous silica, titanate nanotubes, and layered double hydroxides. Nanomaterials in the Wet Processing of Textiles 219–260

  19. Acharya R, Martha S, and Parida KM (2017) Remediation of Cr (VI) using clay minerals, biomasses and industrial wastes as adsorbents. Advanced materials for wastewater treatment 129–170

  20. Saleh TA, Naeemullah TM, Sarı A (2017) Polyethylenimine modified activated carbon as novel magnetic adsorbent for the removal of uranium from aqueous solution. Chem Eng Res Des 117:218–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang G, Wang X, Chai X, Liu J, Deng N (2010) Adsorption of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution on calcined and acid-activated kaolin. Appl Clay Sci 47(3–4):448–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Samokhvalov A (2018) Aluminum metal–organic frameworks for sorption in solution: A review. Coord Chem Rev 374:236–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu R, Shao D, Wang X (2014) Graphene oxide/polypyrrole composites for highly selective enrichment of U(vi) from aqueous solutions. Polym Chem 5(21):6207–6215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Viltres H, López YC, Gupta NK, Leyva C, Paz R, Gupta A, Sengupta A (2020) Functional metal-organic frameworks for metal removal from aqueous solutions. Separation & Purification Reviews 1–22

  25. Prakash Tripathy S, Subudhi S, Das S, Kumar Ghosh M, Das M, Acharya R, Acharya R, Parida K (2021) Hydrolytically stable citrate capped Fe3O4@UiO-66-NH2 MOF: A hetero-structure composite with enhanced activity towards Cr (VI) adsorption and photocatalytic H2 evolution. J Colloid Interface Sci 606(Pt 1):353–366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yin D, Ren H, Li C, Liu J, Liang C (2018) Highly selective hydrogenation of furfural to tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol over MIL-101(Cr)-NH2 supported Pd catalyst at low temperature. Chin J Catal 39(2):319–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Castellanos S, Sai Sankar Gupta KB, Pustovarenko A, Dikhtiarenko A, Nasalevich M, Atienzar P, García H, Gascon J, Kapteijn F (2015) Anchoring of diphenylphosphinyl groups to NH2-MIL-53 by post-synthetic modification. Eur J Inorg Chem 2015(28):4648–4652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang D, Gates BC (2019) Catalysis by metal organic frameworks: perspective and suggestions for future research. ACS Catal 9(3):1779–1798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lawson HD, Walton SP, Chan C (2021) Metal-organic frameworks for drug delivery: a design perspective. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(6):7004–7020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tripathi S, Sreenivasulu B, Suresh A, Rao CVSB, Sivaraman N (2020) Assorted functionality-appended UiO-66-NH2 for highly efficient uranium(vi) sorption at acidic/neutral/basic pH. RSC Adv 10(25):14650–14661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu J-m, Liu T, Wang C-c, Yin X-h, Xiong Z-h (2017) Introduction of amidoxime groups into metal-organic frameworks to synthesize MIL-53(Al)-AO for enhanced U(VI) sorption. J Mol Liq 242:531–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu J-m, Yin X-h, Liu T (2019) Amidoxime-functionalized metal-organic frameworks UiO-66 for U(VI) adsorption from aqueous solution. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 95:416–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu Y, Pang H, Yao W, Wang X, Yu S, Yu Z, Wang X (2018) Synthesis of rod-like metal-organic framework (MOF-5) nanomaterial for efficient removal of U(VI): batch experiments and spectroscopy study. Science Bulletin 63(13):831–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ding M, Cai X, Jiang HL (2019) Improving MOF stability: approaches and applications. Chem Sci 10(44):10209–10230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bai Z-Q, Yuan L-Y, Zhu L, Liu Z-R, Chu S-Q, Zheng L-R, Zhang J, Chai Z-F, Shi W-Q (2015) Introduction of amino groups into acid-resistant MOFs for enhanced U(vi) sorption. J Mater Chem A 3(2):525–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang JY, Zhang N, Zhang L, Fang Y, Deng W, Yu M, Wang Z, Li L, Liu X, Li J (2015) Adsorption of uranyl ions on amine-functionalization of MIL-101(Cr) nanoparticles by a facile coordination-based post-synthetic strategy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies. Sci Rep 5:13514

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. De Decker J, Folens K, De Clercq J, Meledina M, Van Tendeloo G, Du Laing G, Van Der Voort P (2017) Ship-in-a-bottle CMPO in MIL-101(Cr) for selective uranium recovery from aqueous streams through adsorption. J Hazard Mater 335:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu H, Chi F, Zhang S, Wen J, Xiong J, Hu S (2019) Control of pore chemistry in metal-organic frameworks for selective uranium extraction from seawater. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 288:109567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mhatre AM, Chappa S, Chaudhari CV, Bhardwaj YK, Pandey AK (2018) Phosphate functionalized radiation grafted Teflon for capturing and quantifications of U(VI) and Pu(IV) ions at ultra-trace concentration in aqueous samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 317(2):1141–1149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Nie X, Jiang Y, Dong F, Cheng W, Wang J, Ding C, Liu M, Zhang Y, Xia X (2021) Amide and phosphate groups modified bifunctional luffa fiber for highly efficient removal of U(VI) from real uranium wastewater. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 328(2):591–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shao D, Li Y, Wang X, Hu S, Wen J, Xiong J, Asiri AM, Marwani HM (2017) Phosphate-Functionalized Polyethylene with High Adsorption of Uranium(VI). ACS Omega 2(7):3267–3275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Carboni M, Abney CW, Liu S, Lin W (2013) Highly porous and stable metal–organic frameworks for uranium extraction. Chem Sci 4(6):2396–2402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. De Decker J, Rochette J, De Clercq J, Florek J, Van Der Voort P (2017) Carbamoylmethylphosphine oxide-functionalized MIL-101(Cr) as highly selective uranium adsorbent. Anal Chem 89(11):5678–5682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Li X, Pi Y, Xia Q, Li Z, Xiao J (2016) TiO2 encapsulated in Salicylaldehyde-NH2-MIL-101(Cr) for enhanced visible light-driven photodegradation of MB. Appl Catal B 191:192–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee YR, Yu K, Ravi S, Ahn WS (2018) Selective adsorption of rare earth elements over functionalized Cr-MIL-101. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(28):23918–23927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bernt S, Guillerm V, Serre C, Stock N (2011) Direct covalent post-synthetic chemical modification of Cr-MIL-101 using nitrating acid. Chem Commun (Camb) 47(10):2838–2840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hwang YK, Hong DY, Chang JS, Jhung SH, Seo YK, Kim J, Vimont A, Daturi M, Serre C, Ferey G (2008) Amine grafting on coordinatively unsaturated metal centers of MOFs: consequences for catalysis and metal encapsulation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 47(22):4144–4148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tian N, Jia Q, Su H, Zhi Y, Ma A, Wu J, Shan S (2016) The synthesis of mesostructured NH2-MIL-101(Cr) and kinetic and thermodynamic study in tetracycline aqueous solutions. J Porous Mater 23(5):1269–1278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu D, Sun Y, Wang Q (2013) Adsorption of lanthanum (III) from aqueous solution using 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester-grafted magnetic silica nanocomposites. J Hazard Mater 260:409–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang H, Ma L, Cao K, Geng J, Liu J, Song Q, Yang X, Li S (2012) Selective solid-phase extraction of uranium by salicylideneimine-functionalized hydrothermal carbon. J Hazard Mater 229–230:321–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Li X, Mao Y, Leng K, Ye G, Sun Y, Xu W (2017) Synthesis of amino-functionalized MIL-101(Cr) with large surface area. Mater Lett 197:192–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ma X-H, Yang Z, Yao Z-K, Xu Z-L, Tang CY (2017) A facile preparation of novel positively charged MOF/chitosan nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 525:269–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ryu S, Fonseka C, Naidu G, Loganathan P, Moon H, Kandasamy J, Vigneswaran S (2021) Recovery of rare earth elements (Lu, Y) by adsorption using functionalized SBA-15 and MIL-101 (Cr). Chemosphere 281:130869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Yang F, Xie S, Wang G, Yu CW, Liu H, Liu Y (2020) Investigation of a modified metal-organic framework UiO-66 with nanoscale zero-valent iron for removal of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27(16):20246–20258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu L, Fang Y, Meng Y, Wang X, Ma F, Zhang C, Dong H (2020) Efficient adsorbent for recovering uranium from seawater prepared by grafting amidoxime groups on chloromethylated MIL-101(Cr) via diaminomaleonitrile intermediate. Desalination 478:114300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang C, Xiao F-z, Pu Y-q, Xu Y-l, Xu D-y, Zhang K, Liu Y, Peng G-w (2018) Preparation of p-carboxyphenyl azo calix[4]arene phosphate derivative and its extraction properties toward uranium(VI). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 317(3):1235–1241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Yuan L-Y, Liu Y-L, Shi W-Q, Li Z-j, Lan J-H, Feng Y-X, Zhao Y-L, Yuan Y-L, Chai Z-F (2012) A novel mesoporous material for uranium extraction, dihydroimidazole functionalized SBA-15. J Mater Chem 22(33):17019–17026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Duan S, Liu X, Wang Y, Shao D, Alharbi NS, Alsaedi A, Li J (2016) Highly efficient entrapment of U(VI) by using porous magnetic Ni0.6 Fe2.4 O4 micro-particles as the adsorbent. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 65:367–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Budnyak TM, Strizhak AV, Gladysz-Plaska A, Sternik D, Komarov IV, Kolodynska D, Majdan M, Tertykh Vcapital AC (2016) Silica with immobilized phosphinic acid-derivative for uranium extraction. J Hazard Mater 314:326–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Qian Y, Yuan Y, Wang H, Liu H, Zhang J, Shi S, Guo Z, Wang N (2018) Highly efficient uranium adsorption by salicylaldoxime/polydopamine graphene oxide nanocomposites. J Mater Chem A 6(48):24676–24685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Liu X, Sun J, Xu X, Alsaedi A, Hayat T, Li J (2019) Adsorption and desorption of U(VI) on different-size graphene oxide. Chem Eng J 360:941–950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Xu Y, Zhang K, Wang C, Zhu Q, Luo J, Chen F, Xiao F, Peng G (2020) Fabrication of magnetic functionalized m-carboxyphenyl azo calix[4]arene amine oxime derivatives for highly efficient and selective adsorption of uranium (VI). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 323(3):1145–1155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhao Y, Li J, Zhao L, Zhang S, Huang Y, Wu X, Wang X (2014) Synthesis of amidoxime-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2 core–shell magnetic microspheres for highly efficient sorption of U(VI). Chem Eng J 235:275–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Yang P, Liu Q, Liu J, Zhang H, Li Z, Li R, Liu L, Wang J (2017) Interfacial growth of a metal–organic framework (UiO-66) on functionalized graphene oxide (GO) as a suitable seawater adsorbent for extraction of uranium(vi). J Mater Chem A 5(34):17933–17942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Perry DL (2015) The tris(carbonato)dioxouranium(VI) ion: A structural model for uranium 4f7/2, 5/2 X-ray photoelectron spectra satellite structures for oxide and oxygen coordination cores. Vacuum 114:162–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ghanadpour M, Carosio F, Larsson PT, Wagberg L (2015) Phosphorylated cellulose nanofibrils: a renewable nanomaterial for the preparation of intrinsically flame-retardant materials. Biomacromol 16(10):3399–3410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang L, Dong X, Jiang H, Li G, Zhang M (2014) Phosphorylated ordered mesoporous carbon as a novel solid acid catalyst for the esterification of oleic acid. Catal Commun 56:164–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Ju P, Guo H, Bai J, Liu Q, Zhang H, Liu J, Yu J, Chen R, Wang J (2020) Construction of gel-like swollen-layer on polyacrylonitrile surface and its swelling behavior and uranium adsorption properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 576:109–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Liu X, Li J, Wang X, Chen C, Wang X (2015) High performance of phosphate-functionalized graphene oxide for the selective adsorption of U(VI) from acidic solution. J Nucl Mater 466:56–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Yang D, Wang X, Wang N, Zhao G, Song G, Chen D, Liang Y, Wen T, Wang H, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Wang X, Wang S (2018) In-situ growth of hierarchical layered double hydroxide on polydopamine-encapsulated hollow Fe3O4 microspheres for efficient removal and recovery of U(VI). J Clean Prod 172:2033–2044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Husnain SM, Kim HJ, Um W, Chang Y-Y, Chang Y-S (2017) Superparamagnetic adsorbent based on phosphonate grafted mesoporous carbon for uranium removal. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(35):9821–9830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from the Hengyang Science and Technology Plan Project of China (NO. 202002042158) and the Hunan Province Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 2020JJ4077 and NO. 2020JJ6050) are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fangzhu Xiao or Guowen Peng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, X., Liu, J., Ren, Z. et al. Introduction of phosphate groups into metal-organic frameworks to synthesize MIL-101(Cr)-PMIDA for selective adsorption of U(VI). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 889–902 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-08161-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-08161-5

Keywords

Navigation