Skip to main content
Log in

Aggrandizement of uranium (VI) removal performance of Lentinus concinnus biomass by attachment of 2,5-diaminobenzenesulfonic acid ligand

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the native and 2,5-diaminobenzene sulfonic acid (DABSA) attached Lentinus concinnus biomasses were utilized for removal of U(VI) ions from solutions. At 25 °C, the maximum uranium ion adsorption capacity of the native and DABSA attached fungal biomasses were found to be 118.6 and 539.2 mg/g, respectively, at pH 6.0. The negative ΔG° values of U(VI) removal showed that the adsorption procedure were spontaneous. ATR-FTIR data showed that U(VI) ions adsorption the adsorbents was mainly attributed by amine, carboxyl and sulfate groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu W, Liu Z, Chen L, Dong Y (2011) Sorption of uranium(VI) on Na-attapulgite as a function of contact time, solid content, pH, ionic strength, temperature and humic acid. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 289(3):781–788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang L, Lin X, Liu Y, Sun S, Chu H, Chen Y, Liu D, Luo X, Zhang J, Shang R (2020) Carboxymethyl konjac glucomannan mechanically reinforcing gellan gum microspheres for uranium removal. Inter J Biol Macromol 145:535–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozturk M, Zorer OS, Gulcan M (2021) Synthesis and characterization of UTSA-76 metal organic framework containing Lewis basic sites for the liquid-phase adsorption of U(VI). Colloid Surf A 609:125663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kolhe N, Zinjarde S, Acharya C (2020) Removal of uranium by immobilized biomass of a tropical marine yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J Environ Radioact 223–224:106419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Y, Li Y, Liu D, Wang X, Liu D, Xu L (2020) Synthesis of the inorganic-organic hybrid of two-dimensional polydopamine-functionalized titanate nano-sheets and its efficient extraction of U(VI) from aqueous solution. Colloid Surf A 607:125422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun Y, Kang Y, Zhong W, Liu Y, Dai Y (2020) A simple phosphorylation modification of hydrothermally cross-linked chitosan for selective and efficient removal of U(VI). J Solid State Chem 292:121731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tuzen M, Saleh TA, Sarı A, Naeemullah (2020) Interfacial polymerization of trimesoyl chloridewith melamine and palygorskite for efficient uranium ions ultra-removal. Chem Eng Res Des 159:353–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bai Z, Liu Q, Song D, Zhang H, Liu J, Chen R, Yu J, Li R, Wang J (2020) Preparation of a 3D multi-branched chelate adsorbent for high selective adsorption of uranium(VI): Acrylic and diaminomaleonitrile functionalized waste hemp fiber. React Funct Polym 149:104512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang N, Liang J, Niu C, Wang H, Luo Y, Xing W, Ye S, Liang C, Guo H, Guo J, Zhang Y, Zeng G (2020) Amidoxime-based materials for uranium recovery and removal. J Mater Chem A 8:7588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohammed AAR (2020) Potentiality of quercetin-sodium hydroxide modified SpirulinaPlatensis in uranium biosorption from waste effluent. Int J Environ Stud 77:48–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayramoglu G, Arica MY (2019) Star type polymer grafted and polyamidoxime modified silica coated-magnetic particles for adsorption of U(VI) ions from solution. Chem Eng Res Des 147:146–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Singhal P, Vats BG, Pulhani V (2020) Magnetic nanoparticles for the recovery of uranium from sea water: Challenges involved from research to development. J Ind Eng Chem 90:17–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bai J, Ma X, Yan H, Zhu J, Wang K, Wang J (2020) A novel functional porous organic polymer for removal of uranium from wastewater. Micropor Mesopor Mater 306:110441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang Y, Zheng H, Li H, Zhao C, Zhao R, Li S (2020) Highly selective uranium adsorption on 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid-decorated chitosan-coated magnetic silica nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 388:124349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Puspitasari T, Darwis D, Pangerteni DS, Seftiani S, Nurhasni N (2020) Synthesis and characterization of zeolite–amo hybrid composite adsorbent by using simultaneous gamma irradiation for uranium (VI) removal from aqueous solutions. Macromol Symp 391:1900156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen L, Ning S, Huang Y, Chen Y, Ju Z, He X, Lu L, Zhou H, Wang X, Wu Y, Wei Y (2020) Effects of speciation on uranium removal efficiencies with polyamine functionalized silica composite adsorbent in groundwater. J Clean Produc 256:120379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamza MF, Mubark AE, Wei Y, Vincent T, Guibal E (2020) Quaternization of composite algal/PEI beads for enhanced uranium sorption—application to ore acidic leachate. Gels 6:12

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bayramoglu G, Akbulut A, Acıkgoz-Erkaya I, Arica MY (2018) Uranium sorption by native and nitrilotriacetate-modified Bangia atropurpurea biomass: kinetics and thermodynamics J Appl Phycol 30:649–661

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bayramoglu G, Arica MY (2017) Polyethylenimine and tris(2-aminoethyl)amine modified p(GMA-co-EGDMA) microbeads for adsorption of U(VI) ions: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 312:293–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmad M, Wang J, Yang Z, Zhang Q, Zhang B (2020) Ultrasonic-assisted preparation of amidoxime functionalized silica framework via oil-water emulsion method for selective uranium adsorption. Chem Eng J 389:124441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Janu VC, Meena RK, Kumar N, Sharma RK (2020) Surface fluorinated hematite for uranium removal from radioactive effluent. J Environ Chem Eng 8:104218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Amesh P, Suneesh AS, Venkatesan KA, Chandra M, Ravindranath NA (2020) High capacity amidic succinic acid functionalized mesoporous silica for the adsorption of uranium. Colloid Surf A 602:125053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Boulanger N, Kuzenkova AS, Iakunkov A, Romanchuk AY, Trigub AL, Egorov AV, Bauters S, Amidani L, Retegan M, Kvashnina KO, Kalmykov SN, Talyzin AV (2020) Enhanced sorption of radionuclides by defect-rich graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:45122–45135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yousef LA, Bakry AR, Abd El-Magied MO (2020) Uranium (VI) recovery from its leach liquor using zirconium molybdophosphate composite: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 323:549–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Khan A, Wei D, Khuda F, Ma R, Ismail M, Ai Y (2020) Comparative adsorption capabilities of rubbish tissue paper–derived carbon-doped MgO and CaCO3 for EBT and U(VI), studied by batch, spectroscopy and DFT calculations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:13114–13130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Huo Z, Zhao S, Yi J, Zhang H, Li J (2020) Biomass-based cellulose functionalized by phosphonic acid with high selectivity and capacity for capturing U(VI) in aqueous aolution. Appl Sci 10:5455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Arica MY, Bayramoglu G (2016) Polyaniline coated magnetic carboxymethylcellulose beads for selective removal of uranium ions from aqueous solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chemy 310:711–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bayramoglu G, Arica MY (2016) Amidoxime functionalized Trametes trogii pellets for removal of uranium (VI) from aqueous medium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:373–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamza MF, Gamal A, Hussein G, Ngar MS, Abdel-Rahman AA-H, Wei Y, Guibal E (2019) Uranium(VI) and zirconium(IV) sorption on magnetic chitosan derivatives – effect of different functional groups on separation properties. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 94:3866–3882

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang W, Dong F, Liu M, Song H, Nie X, Huo T, Zhao Y, Wang P, Qin Y, Zhou L (2020) Reduction and enrichment of uranium after biosorption on inactivated Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pol J Environ Stud 29:1461–1472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bayramoglu G, Arica MY (2016) MCM-41 silica particles grafted with polyacrylonitrile: Modification in to amidoxime and carboxyl groups for enhanced uranium removal from aqueous medium. Micropor Mesopor Mater 226:117–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bayramoglu G, Akbulut A, Arica MY (2015) Study of polyethyleneimine and amidoxime functionalized hybrid biomass of Spirulina (Arthrospira) platensis for adsorption of uranium (VI) ion. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:17998–18010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yousef LA, Bakry AR, Ahmad AA (2020) Uranium(VI) recovery from acidic leach liquor using manganese oxidecoated zeolite (MOCZ) modified with amine. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 324:409–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chaudharya M, Singhb L, Rekhac P, Srivastavab VC, Mohanty P (2019) Adsorption of uranium from aqueous solution as well as seawater conditions by nitrogen-enriched nanoporous polytriazine. Chem Eng J 378:122236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yousef LA, Bakry AR, Ahmad AA (2020) Uranium(VI) adsorption using a mixture of 1-amino-2-naphthol-4-sulfonic acid and bentonite: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Radiochemistry 62:511–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bayramoglu G, Yilmaz M (2018) Azo dye removal using free and immobilized fungal biomasses: isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamic studies. Fibers and Polymers 19:877–886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Perez-Bustamante JA, Delgado FP (1971) The extraction and spectrophotometric determination of sexavalent uranium with arsenazo11 in aqueous-organic media. Analyst 96:407422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bayramoglu G, Arica MY (2021) Strong and weak cation-exchange groups generated cryogels films for adsorption and purification of lysozyme. Food Chem 342:128295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fang C, Tao Q, Dai Y (2020) Amidoximated orange peel as a specific uranium scavenger. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 326:1831–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Al-Anber MA, Al-Momani IF, Zaitoun MA, Al-Qaisi W (2020) Inorganic silica gel functionalized tris(2-aminoethyl)amine moiety for capturing aqueous uranium (VI) ion. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 325:605–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nuhanovic M, Grebo M, Draganovic S, Memic M, Smjecanin N (2019) Uranium(VI) biosorption by sugar beet pulp: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 322:2065–2078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sabanovic E, Muhic-Sarac T, Nuhanovic M, Memic M (2019) Biosorption of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution by Citrus limon peels: kinetics, equilibrium and batch studies. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 319:425–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hamza MF, Wei Y, Benettayeb A, Wang X, Guibal E (2020) efficient removal of uranium, cadmium and mercury from aqueous solutions using grafted hydrazide-micromagnetite chitosan derivative. J Mater Sci 55:4193–4212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu L, Lin X, Li M, Chu H, Wang H, Xie Y, Du Z, Liu M, Liang L, Gong H, Zhou J, Li Z, Luo X (2021) Microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of carbon doped with phosphorus for uranium(VI) adsorption. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 327:73–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ang KL, Li D, Nikoloski AN (2017) The effectiveness of ion exchange resins in separating uranium and thorium from rare earth elements in acidic aqueous sulfate media. Part 1. Anionic and cationic resins Hydrometallurgy 174:147–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang J, Yang S, Cheng G, Gu P (2020) The adsorption of europium and uranium on the sodium dodecyl sulfate modified molybdenum disulfide composites. J Chem Eng Data 65:2178–2185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Arica TA, Ayas E, Arica MY (2017) Magnetic MCM-41 silica particles grafted with poly (glycidylmethacrylate) brush: Modification and application for removal of direct dyes. Micropor Mesopor Mater 243:64–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dolatyari L, Shateri M, Yaftian MR, Rostamnia S (2019) Unmodified SBA-15 adsorbents for the removal and separation of Th(IV) and U(VI) ions: the role of pore channels and surface-active sites. Sep Sci Technol 54:2863–2878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gado M, Atia B, Morcy A (2019) The role of graphene oxide anchored 1-amino-2-naphthol-4-sulphonic acid on the adsorption of uranyl ions from aqueous solution: kinetic and thermodynamic features. Int J EnvironAnal Chem 99:996–1015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gao Z, Bandosz TJ, Zhao Z, Han M, Qiu J (2009) Investigation of factors affecting adsorption of transition metals on oxidized carbon nanotubes. J Hazard Mater 167:357–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lima EC, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A, Moreno-Piraján JC, Anastopoulos IA (2019) Critical review of the estimation of the thermodynamic parameters on adsorption equilibria. Wrong use of equilibrium constant in the Van’t Hoof equation for calculation of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption. J Mol Liq 273:425–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Escudero C, Poch J, Villaescusa I (2013) Modelling of breakthrough curves of single and binary mixtures of Cu(II), Cd(II), Ni(II) and Pb(II) onto grape stalks waste. Chem Eng J 1217:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bayramoglu G, Arica MY (2016) Amidoxime functionalized Trametes trogii pellets for removal of uranium(VI) from aqueous medium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:373–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Fang C, Tao Q, Dai Y (2020) Amidoximated orange peel as a specifc uranium scavenger. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 326:1831–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Han J, Hu L, He L, Ji K, Liu Y, Chen C, Luo X, Tan N (2020) Preparation and uranium (VI) biosorption for tri-amidoxime modified marine fungus material. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:37313–37323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Hamza MF, Roux JC, Guibal E (2018) Uranium and europium sorption on amidoxime-functionalized magnetic chitosan micro-particles. Chem Eng J 344:124–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Liu S, Ouyang J, Luo J, Sun L, Huang G, Ma J (2018) Removal of uranium(VI) from aqueous solution using graphene oxide functionalized with diethylenetriamine pentaacetic phenylenediamine. J Nucl Sci Technol 55:781–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Li L, Tang S, Cheng B, Liao Q, Lu W, Dai Z, Tan Y, Sun J (2018) Synthesis and adsorption characteristics of calix[6]arene derivative modified Aspergillus niger-Fe3O4 bio-nanocomposite for U(VI). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 316:331–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ai L, Luo X, Lin X, Zhang S (2013) Biosorption behaviors of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution by sunflower straw and insights of binding mechanism. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 298:1823–1834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors on behalf of National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS) wish to offer many thanks for supplying the white rot fungus (Lentinus concinnus).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Omur Celikbical: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis. Gulay Bayramoglu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Writing—original draft, Funding acquisition. Ilkay Acıkgoz-Erkaya: Methodology, Visualization, Investigation. Mehmet Yakup Arica: Project administration, Supervision, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gulay Bayramoglu.

Ethics declarations

Competing of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Celikbıcak, O., Bayramoglu, G., Acıkgoz-Erkaya, I. et al. Aggrandizement of uranium (VI) removal performance of Lentinus concinnus biomass by attachment of 2,5-diaminobenzenesulfonic acid ligand. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 328, 1085–1098 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07708-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07708-w

Keywords

Navigation