Skip to main content
Log in

Radiochemical technique optimization to measure uranium and thorium by α-spectrometry

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common advanced radiochemical technique is the use of the AG® 1-X8 anion exchanger, Cl2− form (from Bio Rad), to separate uranium and/or thorium from a sample by ion exchange. This method is used to separate elements by chemical elution from an ion exchange column via a precipitate of substances (co-precipitation), with Nd3+ as a thin layer of smooth fluoride particles on a membrane filter, then using α-spectrometry to measure uranium and thorium. The obtained data showed that the column could be reused, at least twelve times, safely in separating uranium and thorium from environmental samples, before observing any change in the performance of the exchanger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All the experiments were carried out at radiochemical analysis laboratory at the center of Radiation Protection & Training, King Abdul-Aziz University. The data were measured by using α-spectrometry and all data saved in the system, which are available at Nuclear Engineering Department. All the data are available from the corresponding author (Dr. O. Fallatah) of this manuscript.

Abbreviations

Th:

Thorium

U:

Uranium

HNO3 :

Nitric acid

HCl:

Hydrochloric acid

pCi:

Picocurie

TiCl3:

Titanium (III) chloride

HF:

Hydrofluoric acid

References

  1. Abbasisiar F, Hosseini T, Fathivand A, Heravi Gh (2004) Determination of uranium isotopes (234U, 238U) and natural uranium (U-nat) in water samples by alpha Spectrometry Iran. J Radiat Res 1:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Acena M, Crespo M, Galan M, Gascon J (1994) Determination of isotopes of uranium and thorium in low-level environmental samples. Nucl Instrum Method Phys Res A 339:302–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Galindo C, Mougin L, Nourreddine A (2007) an improved radiochemical separation of uranium and thorium in environmental samples involving peroxide fusion. Appl Radiat Isot 65:9–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saidou M, Francois B, Jean P, Kwato M, Pascal F (2008) A comparison of alpha and gamma Spectrometry for environmental natural radioactivity surveys. J Appl Radiat Isot 66:215–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shabana EI, Al-Mogabes KS, Al-Najem KN, Farouk MA (1999) Radioactivity in some gas-flow lantern mantles produced by different manufacturers. J Appl Radiat Isot 51:609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moghissi AA, Kelley HL, Regnier JE, Carter MW (1969) Low-level counting by liquid scintillation—I Tritium measurement in homogeneous systems. Int J Appl Radiat Isot 145:156

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oh YH, Yoon YY, Koh DC, Ko KS (2019) Measuring cosmogenic 35 S in natural waters using large-volume liquid scintillation counting. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 1739:1745

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sill CW (1987) Precipitation of actinides as fluorides or hydroxides for high-resolution alpha Spectrometry. Nucl Chem Waste Manage 201:215

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kemnitz E, Mahn S, Krahl T (2020) Nano metal fluorides: small particles with great properties. ChemTexts 1:27

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shabana EI, Al-Hobaib AS (1990) Activity concentration of natural radium, thorium and uranium isotopes in ground water of two different regions. Radiochimica Act 87(12):41

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shabana EI, Al-Shammari HL (2001) Assessment of the global fallout of plutonium isotopes and americium-241 in the soil of the central region of Saudi Arabia. J Environ Radioactivity 57:67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beunon H, Chernonozhkin SM, Mattielli, N, Goderis S, Doucet LS, Debaille V, & Vanhaecke F (2020) Innovative two-step isolation of Ni prior to stable isotope ratio measurements by MC-ICP-MS: application to igneous geological reference materials. J Anal Atomic Spect

  13. Cho BW, Choo CO (2019) Geochemical behavior of uranium and radon in groundwater of jurassic granite area, Icheon, middle Korea. Water 11(6):1278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ibrahiem N, Pimple M (1994) Uranium concentrations in sediments of the Suez Canal. Appl Radiat Isot 919:921

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shabana EI, Kinsara AA (2014) Radioactivity in the groundwater of a high background radiation area. J Environ Radioact 181:189

    Google Scholar 

  16. Avila-Rodriguez MA, Aguilar-Ortiz EA, Jalilian AR, Manrique-Arias JC, Zarate-Morales A, Flores-Moreno A (2019) A simple and efficient method to recover isotopically enriched Ni-64 from electrolytic solutions. Appl Radiat Isot 55:58

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ferreira FT, Mesquita LS, Mesquita RB, Rangel AO (2020) Improved sequential injection method for phosphate quantification within a wide dynamic range with in-line pre-concentration to monitor soil leachates. Talanta Open 2:100015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. García-León M, Madurga G: (Eds) (1991) Low-level Measurements of Man-made Radionuclides in the Environment-Proceedings of the 2nd International Summer School. World Scientific.

  19. Gascoyne M (1981) A simple method of uranium extraction from carbonate groundwater and its application to disequilibrium studies. J Geochem Explor,199:207

  20. Sill CW, Williams RL (1981) Precipitation of actinides for α-spectrometry without electrodeposition. Anal Chemica Acta 53:412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tran QT, Pierre S, de Sanoit J, Pomorski M, Bergonzo P (2019) Electro-Precipitation of actinides on boron-doped diamond thin films for solid sources preparation for high-resolution alpha-particle spectrometry. Appl Sci 9(7):1473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Totland M, Jarvis K (1997) Assessment of Dowex 1-X8-based anion-exchange procedures for the separation and determination of ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, iridium, platinum and gold in geological samples by inductively coupled plasma mass Spectrometry. Analyst 19:26

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pimpl M, Yoo B, Yordanova I (1992) Optimization of a radio analytical procedure for the determination of uranium isotopes in environmental samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 437:441

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar D, Singh A, Kumar P, Jha RK, Sahoo SK, Jha V (2020) Sobol sensitivity analysis for risk assessment of uranium in groundwater. Environ Geochem Health 1:13

    Google Scholar 

  25. Park J, Kim JY, Lee K, Kim MS, Kim MJ, Choi JW (2020) Comparison of acid extraction and total digestion methods for measuring Cd isotope ratios of environmental samples. Environ Monit Assess 1:10

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stucker V, Ranville JN, Peacock M, Cho A, Hatfield K J (2011) Evaluation and application of anion exchange resins to measure groundwater uranium flux at a former uranium mill site. Water Res 4866:4876

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vesterlund A, Tovedal A, Nygren U, Ramebäck H (2009) Uncertainty assessment of methods for chemical yield determination in measurement of radioactive strontium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 951:95

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rohwer H, Rheeder N, Hosten E (1997) Interactions of uranium and thorium with arsenazo III in an aqueous medium. Anal Chim Acta 263:268

    Google Scholar 

  29. Truscott JB, Bromley L, Jones P, Evans EH, Turner J, Fairman B (1999) Determination of natural uranium and thorium in environmental samples by ETV-ICP-MS after matrix removal by on-line solid phase extraction. J Anal At Spectrom 627:631

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant No. ( D-072-135-1442). The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR technical and financial support. The authors also thank the Editor and the anonymous reviewers of journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research ( DSR), KAU, Jeddah, under grant No. (D-072-135-1442).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

O. Fallatah will oversee the overall objectives of the article at radiochemical analysis laboratory in Radiation Protection & Training Centre, King Abdul-Aziz University. He’s responsible for the supervision of organizing and overall management of the components of the research activities, ordering required materials, calibration of the Alpha spectrometer, and also be responsible for publication and presentation of results. M. M. T. Qutub carried out analysis, chemical separation, and measurement of results by using α-spectrometry.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Fallatah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fallatah, O., Qutub, M.M.T. Radiochemical technique optimization to measure uranium and thorium by α-spectrometry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 328, 1077–1083 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07706-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07706-y

Keywords

Navigation