Abstract
An analytical technique was developed to determine the age of uranium particles. After the chemical separation of uranium and thorium, the 230Th/234U ratio was measured using single-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and a 233U-based reference material comprising a certain amount of 229Th as a progeny nuclide of 233U. The results allowed us to determine the purification age of two certified materials, i.e., U-850 and U-100, which was in good agreement with the reference purification age (61 y). Moreover, the age of a single U-850 particle was determined with a difference of − 28 to 2 years from the reference date.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Donohue DL (1998) Strengthening IAEA safeguards through environmental sampling and analysis. J Alloys Compd 271–273:11–18
Donohue DL (2002) Strengthened nuclear safeguards. Anal Chem 74:28A-35A
Wallenius M, Morgenstern A, Apostolidis C, Mayer K (2002) Determination of the age of highly enriched uranium. Anal Bio Chem 374:379–384
LaMont SP, Hall G (2005) Uranium age determination by measuring the 230Th/234U ratio. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 264:423–427
Varga Z, Surányi G (2007) Production date determination of uranium-oxide materials by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 599:16–23
Williams RW, Gaffney AM (2011) 230Th–234U model ages of some uranium standard reference materials. In: Proceedings of Radiochim Acta 1:31–35 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory: DOE/K25 Archives)
Pointurier F, Hubert A, Roger G (2013) A method for dating small amounts of uranium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296:593–598
Varga Z, Mayer K, Bonamici CE, Hubert A, Hutcheon I, Kinman W, Kristo M, Pointurier F, Spencer K, Stanley F, Steiner R, Tandon L, Williams R (2015) Validation of reference materials for uranium radiochronometry in the frame of nuclear forensic investigations. Appl Radi Isot 102:81–86
Gaffney AM, Hubert A, Kinman WS, Magara M, Okubo A, Pointurier F, Schorzman KC, Steiner RE, Williams RW (2016) Round-robin 230Th–234U age dating of bulk uranium for nuclear forensics. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:2055–2060
Fauré AL, Dalger T (2017) Age dating of individual micrometer-sized uranium particles by secondary ion mass spectrometry: an additional fingerprint for nuclear safeguards purposes. Anal Chem 89:6663–6669
Varga Z, Venchiarutti C, Nicholl A, Krajkó J, Jakopič R, Mayer K, Richter S, Aregbe Y (2016) IRMM-1000a and IRMM-1000b uranium reference materials certified for the production date. Part I: methodology, preparation and target characteristics. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:1077–1085
Venchiarutti C, Varga Z, Richter S, Nicholl A, Krajko J, Jakopič R, Mayer K, Aregbe Y (2016) IRMM-1000a and IRMM-1000b: uranium reference materials certified for the production date based on the 230Th/234U radiochronometer. Part II: certification. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 308:105–111
Wallenius M, Mayer K (2000) Age determination of plutonium material in nuclear forensics by thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Fresenius J Anal Chem 366:234–238
Wallenius M, Tamborini G, Koch L (2001) The “Age” of plutonium particles. Radiochim Acta 89:55–58
Chen Y, Chang ZY, Zhao YG, Zhang JL, Li JH, Shu FJ (2009) Studies on the age determination of trace plutonium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 281:675–678
Shinonaga T, Donohue D, Ciurapinski A, Klose D (2009) Age determination of single plutonium particles after chemical separation. Spectrochim Acta B 64:95–98
Mayer K, Wallenius M, Varga Z (2013) Nuclear forensics Science: correlating measurable material parameters to the history of nuclear material. Chem Rev 113:884–900
Miyamoto Y, Esaka F, Suzuki D, Magara M (2013) Precies age determination of a single plutonium particle using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. Radiochim Acta 101:745–748
Esaka F, Suzuki D, Miyamoto Y, Magara M (2015) Plutonium age determination from 240Pu/236U ratios in individual particles by ICP-MS without prior chemical separation. Microchem J 118:69–72
Miyamoto Y, Suzuki D, Esaka F, Magara M (2015) Accurate purification age determination of individual uranium-plutonium mixed particles. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:7165–7173
Szakal C, Simons DS, Fassett JD, Fahey AJ (2019) Advances in age-dating of individual uranium particles by large geometry secondary ion mass spectrometry. Analyst 144:4219–4232
Esaka F, Esaka KT, Lee CG, Magara M, Sakurai S, Usuda S, Watanabe K (2007) Particle isolation for analysis of uranium minor isotopes in individual particles by secondary ion mass spectrometry. Talanta 71:1011–1015
Usuda S, Yasuda K, Kokubu YS, Esaka F, Lee CG, Magara M, Sakurai S, Watanabe K, Hirayama F, Fukuyama H, Esaka KT, Iguchi K, Miyamoto Y, Chai JY (2006) Challenge to ultra-trace analytical techniques of nuclear materials in environmental samples for safeguards at JAERI: methodologies for physical and chemical form estimation. Int J Environ Anal Chem 86:663–675
Browne E, Tuli JK (2007) Nuclear data sheets for A = 234. Nucl Data Sheets 108:681–772
Browne E, Tuli JK (2012) Nuclear data sheets for A = 230. Nucl Data Sheets 113:2113–2185
Usuda S, Magara M, Esaka F, Yasuda K, Kokubu YS, Lee CG, Miyamoto Y, Suzuki D, Inagawa J, Sakurai S, Murata F (2010) QA/QC activities and estimation of uncertainty for ultra-trace analysis of uranium and plutonium in safeguards environmental samples. J Nucl Radiochem Sci 11:A5–A9
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Nuclear Regulation Authority, Japan. The authors would like to thank Mr. T. Watanabe and Mr. D. Endo for the chemical treatments, Mr. T. Onodera and Mr. H. Matsuyama for the sample preparation, and Mr. Y. Takahashi for the ICP–MS measurements. The valuable comments of reviewers are appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suzuki, D., Tomita, R., Tomita, J. et al. Age determination analysis of a single uranium particle for safeguards. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 328, 103–111 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07626-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07626-x