Skip to main content
Log in

2D peak fitting for the analysis of radioxenon beta gamma spectra

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atmospheric traces of radioactive xenon, in particular \(^{131m}{\text {Xe}}\), \(^{133}{\text {Xe}}\), \(^{133m}{\text {Xe}}\) and \(^{135}{\text {Xe}}\), can provide “smoking gun” evidence to classify underground nuclear fission reactions. Current software used to quantify isomer concentrations relies on a Region of Interest (ROI) method to sort beta-gamma coincidence counts. This experiences errors when classifying nuclides, especially with metastable nuclides, due to the difficulty of deconvoluting overlapping ROIs and accounting for shifts in detector calibration over time. To address this uncertainty, our technique mathematically models the distinctive peaks in an isomer’s beta-gamma spectrum. The function representations are then fitted to measured spectra to determine the concentrations of the primary isomers in the sample. From this proof-of-concept, we hope to create a more precise and accurate system to detect nuclear fission reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use natural units wherein energy, mass, and momentum all have units of energy.

  2. For Gaussian functions the normalization coefficient is the usual \(N=\frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2 \pi }}\). For the beta distributions the functional form is more complicated but can be determined by integration.

References

  1. Bowyer T, Abel K, Hubbard C, Panisko M, Reeder P, Thompson R, Warner R (1999) Field testing of collection and measurement of radioxenon for the comprehensive test ban treaty. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 240(1):109–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowyer TW, Schlosser C, Abel KH, Auer M, Hayes JC, Heimbigner TR, McIntyre JI, Panisko ME, Reeder PL, Satorius H et al (2002) Detection and analysis of xenon isotopes for the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty international monitoring system. J Environ Radioact 59(2):139–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowyer TW, McIntyre JI, Reeder PL (1999) High sensitivity detection of Xe isotopes via beta-gamma coincidence counting. Technical report, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

  4. McIntyre JI, Schrom BT, Cooper MW, Prinke AM, Suckow TJ, Ringbom A, Warren GA (2016) A program to generate simulated radioxenon beta-gamma data for concentration verification and validation and training exercises. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307(3):2381–2387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper MW, Auer M, Bowyer TW, Casey LA, Elmgren K, Ely JH, Foxe MP, Gheddou A, Gohla H, Hayes JC et al (2019) Radioxenon net count calculations revisited. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 321(2):369–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maceira M, Blom PS, MacCarthy JK, Marceillo OE, Euler GG, Begnaud ML, Ford SR, Pasyanos ME, Orris GJ, Foxo MP, Arrowsmith SJ, Merchant BJ, Slinkard ME (June 2017) Trends in nuclear explosion monitoring research & development. Technical Report LA-UR-17-21274, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos NM. https://doi.org/10.2172/1355758

  7. Haas DA, Biegalski SRF, Biegalski KMF (2009) SDAT: analysis of \(^{131m}\)Xe with \(^{133}\)Xe interference. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282:715–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper MW, Auer M, Bowyer TW, Casey LA, Elmgren K, Elmgren JH, Foxe MP, Gheddou A, Gohla H, Hayes JC, Johnson CM, Kalinowski M, Klingberg FJ, Liu B, Mayer MF, McIntyre JI, Plenteda R, Popov V, Matthias Z (2018) Radioxenon net count calculation refinements. Technical report, Pacific Northwest National Lab, Richland, WA

  9. Cooper MW, Bowyer TW, Hayes JC, Heimbigner TR, Hubbard CW, McIntyre JI, Schrom BT (2008) Spectral analysis of radioxenon. Technical report, Pacific Northwest National Lab, Richland WA

  10. Biegalski SR, Biegalski KM, Haas DA (2007) Testing the spectral deconvolution algorithm tool (SDAT) with Xe spectra. Technical report, Texas University at Austin

  11. Biegalski S, Flory A, Haas D, Ely J, Cooper M (2013) Sdat implementation for the analysis of radioxenon \(\beta \)-\(\gamma \) coincidence spectra. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296(1):471–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Biegalski S, Flory AE, Schrom BT, Ely JH, Haas DA, Bowyer TW, Hayes JC (2011) Implementing the standard spectrum method for analysis of \(\beta \)-\(\gamma \) coincidence spectra. In: Proceedings of the 2011 monitoring research review: ground-based nuclear explosion monitoring technologies, pp 607–615

  13. Biegalski KF, Biegalski S, Haas D (2008) Performance evaluation of spectral deconvolution analysis tool (sdat) software used for nuclear explosion radionuclide measurements. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 276(2):407–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rouaud M (July 2013) Probability, Statistics, and Estimation. Incertitudes

  15. Krane KS (1988) Introductory nuclear physics. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Air Force Technical Applications Center, and particularly the 21st Surveillance Squadron to include David Straughn, for providing the experimental data used in this study. We also thank members of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for their extensive help and encouragement in this study. In particular, we thank Matthew Cooper and Michael Mayer for their many very thoughtful discussions concerning radioxenon, the beta-gamma detectors used to measure the isomers of interest, and the algorithms used to analyze the detector data. We also thank Justin McIntyre for his help in obtaining the extensive simulated data set used in this study. This work would not have been possible without their efforts; these individuals are true experts in their field and we very much hope to work more extensively with them in the future.

Funding

This study was funded by the Air Force Technical Applications Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thienbao Carpency.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declares that have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sesler, J., Scoville, J., Carpency, T. et al. 2D peak fitting for the analysis of radioxenon beta gamma spectra. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 327, 445–456 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07518-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07518-6

Keywords

Navigation