Skip to main content
Log in

Interferences in the determination of lutetium using neutron activation analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have investigated the severity of interferences in the determination of lutetium in neutron activation analysis. The preferred reaction makes use of the large radiative capture cross section of 2090 b for 176Lu(n,γ)177Lu, which emits a 208.4 keV gamma emission (t1/2 = 6.73 days). Activation of 176Lu simultaneously produces 177mLu, which also emits at 208.4 keV (t1/2 = 160.4 days). We found that these convolutions did not produce significant error in lutetium analysis for a sample of NIST 1633c, even for longer decay times used to reduce the 239Np interference at 209.8 keV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cimpan C, Kennedy G (2016) Measurement of k0 and Q0 values for lutetium and europium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 309:173–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sluijis Van (2014) A simplified method to replace the Westcott formalism in ko-NAA using non-1/v nuclides. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 300:539–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sluijis Van (2019) The Westcott convention converted in the extended version of the modified Høgdahl convention. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 319:1277–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cánovas CR, Chapron S, Arrachart G, Pellet-Rostaing S (2019) Leaching of rare earth elements (REEs) and impurities fromphosphogypsum: a preliminary insight for further recovery of critical raw materials. J Clean Prod 219:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borges RC, Favaro DIT, Caldas VG, Lauria DC, Bernedo AVB (2016) Instru-mental neutron activation analysis, gamma spectrometry and geographic in-formation system techniques in the determination and mapping of rare earth element in phosphogypsum stacks. Environ Earth Sci 75:705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jimenez-Reyes M, Tenorio D, Esparza JR, Cruz-Jiménez RL, Mandujano C, Elizalde S (2000) Neutron activation analysis of obsidians from quarries of the Central Quaternary Trans-Mexican Volcanic Axis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 250:465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neisiani MA, Latifi M, Chaouki J, Chilian C (2018) Novel approach in ko-NAA for highly concentrated REE samples. Talanta 180:403–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Orvini E, Speziali M, Salvini A, Herborg C (2000) Rare earth elements determination in environmental matrices by INAA. Microchem J 67:97–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Silachyov I (2016) Rare earths analysis of rock samples by instrumental neutron activation analysis, internal standard method. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 310:573–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brunfelt AO, Roelandts I (1973) Determination of rare earths and thorium in apatites by thermal and epithermal neutron-activation analysis. Talanta 21:513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krane KS (1987) Introductory Nuclear physics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Currie LA (1968) Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination, application to radiochemistry. Anal Chem 40:586–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheldon Landsberger.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brennan, C., Landsberger, S. Interferences in the determination of lutetium using neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 322, 1201–1205 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06674-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06674-8

Keywords

Navigation