Abstract
The study was conducted to understand, (a) the effect of pH on the speciation of uranium in acid mine drainage and (b) determine the effect of uranium speciation on the removal of gross alpha activity from acid mine drainage. Speciation modeling predicted a dominance of neutral and positively charged species under acidic and neutral conditions. Negative species become dominant from pH 8. The effectiveness of the anionic exchange resin to remove gross alpha activity was lower under acidic conditions (pH < 6) compared to alkaline conditions (pH ≥ 8).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maree JP, Streydom WF, Adlem CJL, De Beer M, Van Tonder GJ, Van Dijk BJ (2004) Neutralization of acid mine water and sludge disposal. WRC Report no. 1057/1/04. Water Research Commission, Pretoria
Winde F, Wade P, van der Walt IJ (2004) Gold tailings as a source of waterborne uranium contamination of streams: the Koekemoerspruit (Klerksdorp goldfield, South Africa) as a case study. Part I of III: Uranium migration along the aqueous pathway. Water SA 30(2):219–225
Akcil A, Koldas S (2006) Acid mine drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. J Clean Prod 14:1139–1145
Peppas A, Komnitsas K, Halikia I (2000) Use of organic covers for acid mine drainage control. Miner Eng 13:563–574
Adler R, Rascher J (2007) A strategy for the management of acid mine drainage from gold mines in Gauteng. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Report No. CSIR/NRE/PW/ER/2007/0053/C. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria
Coetzee H, Hobbs PJ, Burgess JE, Thomas A, Keet M (eds) (2010) Mine water management in the Witwatersrand Gold fields with special emphasis on acid mine drainage. Report to the Inter-Ministerial Committee on acid mine drainage
Van Tonder D, Coetzee H (2008) Regional mine closure strategy for the West Rand Goldfield (Report no. 2008-0175). Department of Minerals and Energy, Council for Geosciences, Pretoria
Tutu H, McCarthy TS, Cukrowska E (2008) The chemical characteristics of acid mine drainage with particular reference to sources, distribution and remediation: the Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa as a case study. Appl Geochem 23:3666–3684
Acknowledgements
The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged by the corresponding author. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. The Eco-Analytica Laboratory of the North-West University, is also acknowledged for their assistance in the ICP-MS and anion analysis of samples. Purolite is also acknowledged for supplying the ion exchange resins used in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The anionic exchange resins used in this study were requested by the research team and supplied by Purolite as free 1L samples. No further support or contact was maintained with Purolite after the supply of the resins.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dlamini, T.C., Tshivhase, V.M., Maleka, P. et al. The effect of uranium speciation on the removal of gross alpha activity from acid mine drainage using anion exchange resin. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 319, 357–363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6354-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6354-7