Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 316, Issue 3, pp 1039–1046 | Cite as

Deposition density of 134Cs and 137Cs and particle size distribution of soil and sediment profile in Hibara Lake area, Fukushima: an investigation of 134Cs and 137Cs indirect deposition into lake from surrounding area

  • Triyono Basuki
  • Sunao Miyashita
  • Masaya Tsujimoto
  • Satoru Nakashima


Indirect deposition process of 134Cs and 137Cs beyond river system into Hibara Lake, Fukushima was investigated by analyzing the deposition density of 134Cs and 137Cs and particle size distribution of soil and sediment. Sediment samples of shallow area of lake adjacent to catchment with different slope were used. The sediment depth profile comparison among sampling areas showed faster 134Cs and 137Cs indirect deposition rate in sediment near steep slope area. 134Cs and 137Cs were concentrated dominantly in fine particle, indicating that the 134Cs and 137Cs incorporated to fine particle were dominant species in indirect deposition process.


Shallow area sediment Depth profile Particle size distribution Indirect deposition 



This research is conducted with strong financial support from Phoenix Leader Education Program (Hiroshima Initiative) for Renaissance from Radiation Disaster, Hiroshima University. We express our gratitude to two anonymous reviewers that have given valuable comments.


  1. 1.
    IAEA (2015) The Fukushima Daiichi accident. FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI Accid. Tech. vol 1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonnett PJP (1990) A review of the erosional behaviour of radionuclides in selected drainage basins. J Environ Radioact 11:251–266. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hayashi S (2016) Migration and accumulation of radioactive cesium in the upstream region of river watersheds affected by the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: a review. Glob Environ Res 20:45–52Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurikami H, Kitamura A, Thomas S, Onishi Y (2014) Sediment and 137Cs behaviors in the Ogaki Dam Reservoir during a heavy rainfall event. J Environ Radioact 137:10–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hakanson L, Brittain JE, Monte L et al (1996) Modelling of radiocesium in lakes—the VAMP model. J Environ Radioact 33:255–308. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoshimura K, Onda Y, Fukushima T (2014) Sediment particle size and initial radiocesium accumulation in ponds following the Fukushima DNPP accident. Sci Rep 4:4514. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kitamura A, Yamaguchi M, Kurikami H et al (2014) Predicting sediment and cesium-137 discharge from catchments in eastern Fukushima. Anthropocene 5:22–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    He Q, Walling DE, Owens PN (1996) Interpreting the 137Cs profiles observed in several small lakes and reservoirs in southern England. Chem Geol 129:115–131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Putyrskaya V, Klemt E, Röllin S (2009) Migration of 137Cs in tributaries, lake water and sediment of Lago Maggiore (Italy, Switzerland)—analysis and comparison with Lago di Lugano and other lakes. J Environ Radioact 100:35–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kurikami H, Funaki H, Malins A et al (2016) Numerical study of sediment and 137Cs discharge out of reservoirs during various scale rainfall events. J Environ Radioact 164:73–83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ochiai S, Nagao S, Yamamoto M et al (2013) Deposition records in lake sediments in western Japan of radioactive Cs from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident. Appl Radiat Isot 81:366–370. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evrard O, Laceby JP, Lepage H et al (2015) Radiocesium transfer from hillslopes to the Pacific Ocean after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident: a review. J Environ Radioact 148:92–110. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Campbell BL (1983) Applications of environmental caesium-137 for the determination of sedimentation rates in reservoirs and lakes related catchment studies in developing countries. Radioisot Sediment Stud 298:7–29Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ligero RA, Casas-Ruiz M, Barrera M et al (2010) An alternative radiometric method for calculating the sedimentation rates: application to an intertidal region (SW of Spain). Appl Radiat Isot 68:1602–1609. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Konoplev A, Golosov V, Wakiyama Y et al (2017) Natural attenuation of Fukushima-derived radiocesium in soils due to its vertical and lateral migration. J Environ Radioact. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Konoplev A, Golosov V, Laptev G et al (2016) Behavior of accidentally released radiocesium in soil e water environment: looking at Fukushima from a Chernobyl perspective. J Environ Radioact 151:568–578. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heit M, Miller KM (2014) Cesium-137 sediment depth profile and inventories in Adirondack Lake sediments. Biogeochemistry 3:243–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Longmore ME, Torgersen T, O’Leary BM (1986) Cesium-137 redistribution in the sediment of Playa, Lake Tyrrell, Northwestern Victoria, stratigraphy and Cesium-137 mobility in the upper sediments. Palaeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 54:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cao L, Ishii N, Zheng J et al (2017) Vertical distributions of Pu and radiocesium isotopes in sediments from Lake Inba after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: source identification and accumulation. Appl Geochem 78:287–294. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clouvas A, Xanthos S, Takoudis G et al (2007) Twenty-year follow-up study of radiocesium migration in soil. Radiat Prot Dosim 124:372–377. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pourchet M, Pinglot JF, Marie AM (1989) Cesium 137 and Lead 210 in alpine lake sediment, measurement and modelling of mixing process. J Geophys Res 94(9):12761–12770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fisher JB, Lick WJ, McCall PL, Robbins JA (1980) Vertical mixing of lake sediments by tubificid oligochaetes. J Geophys Res Ocean 85:3997–4006. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Komissarov MA, Ogura S (2017) Distribution and migration of radiocesium in sloping landscapes three years after the Fukushima-1 nuclear accident. Eurasian Soil Sci 50:861–871. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Atarashi-Andoh M, Koarashi J, Takeuchi E et al (2015) Catchment-scale distribution of radiocesium air dose rate in a mountainous deciduous forest and its relation to topography. J Environ Radioact 147:1–7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Monte L, Brittain JE, Hkanson L et al (2004) Review and assessment of models for predicting the migration of radionuclides from catchments. J Environ Radioact 75:83–103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Monte L, Brittain JE, Håkanson L et al (2003) Review and assessment of models used to predict the fate of radionuclides in lakes. J Environ Radioact 69:177–205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Satoh Y, Sagisaka H (1997) Tropic status of Lake Akimoto and physicochemical comparison with two sister lakes of the same age. Jpn J Limnol 58:359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsujimoto M, Miyashita S, Nguyen HT (2016) A correlation between the transfer factor of radioactive cesium from soil into rice plants and the grain size distribution of paddy soil in Fukushima. Radiat Saf Manag 15:1–4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aoi Y, Fukushi K, Itono T et al (2013) Distribution and mineralogy of radioactive Cs in reservoir sediment contaminated by the Fukushima nuclear accident. J Miner Petrol Sci 109:23–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hakanson L (2004) Modelling the transport of radionuclides from land to water. J Environ Radioact 73:267–287. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Putyrskaya V, Klemt E (2007) Modeling 137Cs migration processes in lake sediments. J Environ Radioact 96:54–62. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bostick BC, Vairavamurthy MA, Karthikeyan KG, Chorover J (2002) Cesium adsorption on clay minerals: an EXAFS spectroscopic investigation. Environ Sci Technol 36:2670–2676. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sato K, Fujimoto K, Dai W, Hunger M (2013) Molecular mechanism of heavily adhesive Cs: why radioactive Cs is not decontaminated from soil. J Phys Chem C 117:14075–14080. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Geospatial information authority of JapanGoogle Scholar
  35. 35. Accessed 6 Jan 2018
  36. 36.
    Cooper JA (1970) Factors determining the ultimate detection sensitivity of Ge(Li) gamma-ray spectrometers. Nucl Instrum Methods 82:273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radioactivity Environmental Protection Course, Phoenix Leader Education ProgramHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of ScienceHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  3. 3.Natural Science Center for Basic Research and DevelopmentHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations