Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) of Nok sculptures in I. P. Stanback Museum

  • Z. J. SunEmail author
  • F. Martin
  • Q. S. Cai
  • S. Lassell


The purpose of this research is to conduct provenance study of the Nok sculptures in the I.P. Stanback Museum via instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). Several samples at different points on the sculptures were collected and then irradiated with thermal/epithermal neutrons from the PULSTAR reactor. INAA results indicate that (1) ceramic samples from the sculptures have different elemental concentrations from those of soil samples in which the sculptures may have been buried; (2) ceramic samples of the two different Nok sculptures share similar elemental concentrations; (3) ceramic firing processes cannot change the chemical composition of clay significantly.


Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) Provenance Principal component analysis (PCA) PULSTAR reactor Nok culture 



This research is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Evans-Allen project number SCX-312-06-16. The authors would like to thank Mr. Giordano Angeletti for photographs of sculptures as well as Mr. Patro Ulmer, Curator, and Mr. Davion Petty, Program Coordinator of the I. P. Stanback Museum for facilitating access to the artifacts in the collection.


  1. 1.
    Hevesy G and Levi H (1936) The action of neutrons on the rare earth elements. Det.Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Mathematisk-fysiske Meddelelser XIV (5):3–34Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenberg R, Bode P, Fernandes E (2011) Spectrochim Acta B 66:193–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harbottle G (1976) Activation analysis in archaeology. In: Newton GWA (ed) Radiochemistry: a specialist periodical report, vol 3. The Chemical Society, London, pp 33–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glascock M, Neff H (2003) Meas Sci Technol 14:1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fagg B (1959) The Nok culture in prehistory. J Hist Soc Niger 1(4):288–293Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blier S, Abiodun R (2001) A history of art in Africa. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 78–82Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fagg B (1969) Recent work in West Africa: new light on the Nok culture. World Archaeol 1(1):41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breunig P (2014) Nok African sculpture in archaeological context. Africa Magna, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Institute of Standards and Technology (2008) Certificate of Analysis: Standard Reference Material 1648a Urban Particulate Matter. National Institute of Standards and Technology, GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmitt B, Segebade C, Fusban H (1980) Waste incineration ash—a versatile environmental reference material. J Radioanal Chem 60(1):99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tabulated Reactor Data, NC State University. Accessed 12 Jan 2017
  12. 12.
    Glascock M (2015) Tables for analytical methods at MURR: NAA, XRF and ICP-MS, University of MissouriGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Corte F (1987) The K0-standardization method: a move to the optimization of neutron activation analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, GENT UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kubesova M (2012) K0 Standardization in Neutron Activation Analysis at LVR-15 Reactor in Řež. Ph.D. Thesis, Czech Technical University in PragueGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Currie L (1968) Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination—application to radiochemistry. Anal Chem 40:586–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nuclear Activation Analysis System, Applied Radiation Sciences Laboratory at the South Carolina State University. Accessed 12 May 2017

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Radiation Sciences LaboratorySouth Carolina State UniversityOrangeburgUSA
  2. 2.I. P. Stanback Museum and Planetarium, South Carolina State UniversityOrangeburgUSA
  3. 3.Nuclear Reactor ProgramNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations