Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative comparison between PGNAA measurements and MCNPX simulations

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A MCNPX model of a neutron activation facility for radioactive waste characterization was built to support experimental studies. To validate this model, small samples of different elemental composition were irradiated and experimental data are compared to simulation results obtained using different neutron capture prompt gamma ray databases. The different databases employed lead to similar results. Simulated and measured net peak areas agree within ±20 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mauerhofer E, Havenith A (2014) The MEDINA facility for the assay of the chemotoxic inventory of radioactive waste packages. J Radiat Nucl Chem. doi:10.1007/s10967-014-3210-2

    Google Scholar 

  2. MCNPX User’s Manual Version 2.6.0, LA-CP-07-1473, April 2008

  3. Nicol T, Perot B, Carasco C, Brackx E, Mariani A, Passard C, Mauerhofer E, Collot J (2014) 235U and 239Pu characterization in radioactive waste using neutron-induced fission delayed gamma rays. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium 2014

  4. Mauerhofer E, Havenith A, Carasco C, Payan E, Kettler J, Ma JL, Perot B (2013) Quantitative comparison between PGNAA measurements and MCNP calculations in view of the characterization of radioactive wastes in Germany and France. AIP Proc. doi:10.1063/1.4802364

    Google Scholar 

  5. Havenith A (2015) Stoffliche Charakterisierung radioaktiver Abfallprodukte durch ein Multi-Element-Analyseverfahren basierend auf der instrumentellen Neutronen-Aktivierungs-Analyse—MEDINA—Schriften des Forschungszentrum Jülich, Energie & Umwelt/Energy & Environment, Band/Volume 248, ISBN 978-3-95806-033-2

  6. Java-based Nuclear Data Information System (JANIS). http://www.oecd-nea.org/janisweb/search/endf

  7. Chadwick MB et al (2006) Next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear science and technology. Nucl Data Sheets 107:2931–3060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mildenberger F, Mauerhofer E (2015) Thermal neutron die-away times in large samples irradiated with a pulsed 14 MeV neutron source. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. doi:10.1007/s10967-015-4178-2

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reedy RC, Frankle SC (2002) Prompt gamma rays from radative capture of thermal neutrons by elements from hydrogen through zinc. At Data Nucl Data 80:1–34. https://www-nds.iaea.org/pgaa/PGAAdatabase/LANL/CD-ROM/Frankle/index.html

  10. Thermal Neutron Capture Gamma database (CapGam). http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/capgam/index.html

  11. Database of prompt gamma rays from slow neutron capture for elemental analysis. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2006. http://www-pub.iaea.org/books/IAEABooks/7030/Database-of-Prompt-Gamma-Rays-from-Slow-Neutron-Capture-for-Elemental-Analysis

  12. Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF) Retrieval http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/

  13. Experimental Unevaluated Nuclear Data List (XUNDL). http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/ensdf/xundl.jsp

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Mauerhofer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nicol, T., Carasco, C., Perot, B. et al. Quantitative comparison between PGNAA measurements and MCNPX simulations. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 308, 671–677 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4451-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4451-4

Keywords

Navigation