Abstract
A MCNPX model of a neutron activation facility for radioactive waste characterization was built to support experimental studies. To validate this model, small samples of different elemental composition were irradiated and experimental data are compared to simulation results obtained using different neutron capture prompt gamma ray databases. The different databases employed lead to similar results. Simulated and measured net peak areas agree within ±20 %.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mauerhofer E, Havenith A (2014) The MEDINA facility for the assay of the chemotoxic inventory of radioactive waste packages. J Radiat Nucl Chem. doi:10.1007/s10967-014-3210-2
MCNPX User’s Manual Version 2.6.0, LA-CP-07-1473, April 2008
Nicol T, Perot B, Carasco C, Brackx E, Mariani A, Passard C, Mauerhofer E, Collot J (2014) 235U and 239Pu characterization in radioactive waste using neutron-induced fission delayed gamma rays. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium 2014
Mauerhofer E, Havenith A, Carasco C, Payan E, Kettler J, Ma JL, Perot B (2013) Quantitative comparison between PGNAA measurements and MCNP calculations in view of the characterization of radioactive wastes in Germany and France. AIP Proc. doi:10.1063/1.4802364
Havenith A (2015) Stoffliche Charakterisierung radioaktiver Abfallprodukte durch ein Multi-Element-Analyseverfahren basierend auf der instrumentellen Neutronen-Aktivierungs-Analyse—MEDINA—Schriften des Forschungszentrum Jülich, Energie & Umwelt/Energy & Environment, Band/Volume 248, ISBN 978-3-95806-033-2
Java-based Nuclear Data Information System (JANIS). http://www.oecd-nea.org/janisweb/search/endf
Chadwick MB et al (2006) Next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear science and technology. Nucl Data Sheets 107:2931–3060
Mildenberger F, Mauerhofer E (2015) Thermal neutron die-away times in large samples irradiated with a pulsed 14 MeV neutron source. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. doi:10.1007/s10967-015-4178-2
Reedy RC, Frankle SC (2002) Prompt gamma rays from radative capture of thermal neutrons by elements from hydrogen through zinc. At Data Nucl Data 80:1–34. https://www-nds.iaea.org/pgaa/PGAAdatabase/LANL/CD-ROM/Frankle/index.html
Thermal Neutron Capture Gamma database (CapGam). http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/capgam/index.html
Database of prompt gamma rays from slow neutron capture for elemental analysis. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2006. http://www-pub.iaea.org/books/IAEABooks/7030/Database-of-Prompt-Gamma-Rays-from-Slow-Neutron-Capture-for-Elemental-Analysis
Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF) Retrieval http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/
Experimental Unevaluated Nuclear Data List (XUNDL). http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/ensdf/xundl.jsp
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nicol, T., Carasco, C., Perot, B. et al. Quantitative comparison between PGNAA measurements and MCNPX simulations. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 308, 671–677 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4451-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4451-4