Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of short-lived fission product yields with gamma spectrometry

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The majority of fission yield measurements to date have examined cumulative yields of long-lived nuclides. We present a method for determining independent as well as cumulative fission yields using gamma spectrometry and a Bayesian inverse analysis. This paper outlines the impetus for new fission product yield measurements, the methodology developed to measure these and other nuclear parameters, and initial experimental results for long-lived nuclides and sensitivity analyses. In initial scoping measurements, the cumulative yield of \(^{140}\)Ba was estimated as \(4.9966\pm 0.3309\) %, and the independent yield of \(^{140}\)La was estimated to be \(0.0045\pm 0.0022\) %. These estimated values are commensurate with existing literature values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some values are not independent, and a multivariate normal distribution must be used with the appropriate covariance matrix. For example, the decay constants of radionuclides are used in computing the predicted nuclide activities as well as the measured activities, thus the measured activities and decay constants used in computing \(R_{\theta }\) are correlated.

  2. If there was an unforeseen bias in the methodology or data collection, the estimation of the flux would be skewed. Using this value in subsequent analyses based on the same experiment would remove effects present in both analyses. Using the average flux determined using \(^{99}\)Mo as a standard essentially normalizes results using this flux value to the fission yield of \(^{99}\)Mo.

  3. Recall, the uncertainty used in the prior distribution is three times the maximum literature value.

  4. Sufficient convergence was obtained after 5000 samples. Thus, no additional samples were computed in order to conserve computational resources.

References

  1. Chadwick MB, Herman M et al (2011) Nucl Data Sheets 112:2887–2996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Selby HD, Innes MRM, Barr DW et al (2010) Nucl Data Sheets 111:2891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chadwick MB, Kawano T, Barr DW et al (2010) Nucl Data Sheets 111:2923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laurec J, Adam A, Bruyne T et al (2010) Nucl Data Sheets 112:3135

    Google Scholar 

  5. Metz LA, Payne RF, Friese JI et al (2009) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282:373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Finn E, Metz LA, Greenwood L et al (2012) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296:763–767

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mills RW (1995) Fission product yield evaluation. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham

  8. Wahl AC (1962) Phys Rev 126:1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wahl AC (1980) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 55:111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wahl AC (1988) At. Nucl Data Tables 39:1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koning A, Dean C, Fischer U et al (2013) Validation of the JEFF 3.1 nuclear data library: JEFF Report 23. Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris

  12. Aster RC, Borchers B, Thurber CH (2012) Parameter estimation and inverse problems. Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kapur JN, Kesavan HK (1992) Entropy optimization principles with applications. Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelley CT (1999) Iterative methods for optimization. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Boyce WE, DiPrima RC (2005) Elementary differential equations and boundary value problems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gauld I, Radulescu G, Ilas G et al (2011) Nucl Technol 174:169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knoll GF (2010) Radiation detection and measurement. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tarantola A (2005) Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Katakura JI (2012) JENDL FP decay data file 2011 and fission yields data file 2011. Japan Atomic Energy Agency

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under Grant Award Number, 2012-DN-130-NF0001-02. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Dayman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dayman, K., Biegalski, S. & Haas, D. Determination of short-lived fission product yields with gamma spectrometry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 305, 213–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-3993-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-3993-9

Keywords

Navigation