Skip to main content
Log in

Porous chromatographic materials as substrates for preparing synthetic nuclear explosion debris particles

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several porous chromatographic materials were investigated as synthetic substrates for preparing surrogate nuclear explosion debris particles. Eighteen metals, including some of forensic interest, were loaded onto materials by immersing them in metal solutions (556 mg/L of each metal) to fill the pores, applying gentle heat (110 °C) to drive off water, and then treating them at high temperatures (up to 800 °C) in air to form less soluble metal species. High-boiling-point metals were uniformly loaded on spherical controlled-pore glass to emulate early fallout, whereas low-boiling-point metals were loaded on core–shell silica to represent coated particles formed later in the nuclear fallout-formation process. Analytical studies characterized material balance and the formation of recalcitrant species. Metal loading was 1.5–3 times higher than expected from the pore volume alone, a result attributed to surface coating. Most metals were passively loaded; that is, solutions filled the pores without active metal discrimination. However, niobium and tin concentrations were lower in solutions after pore filling, and were found in elevated concentrations in the final products, indicating selective loading. High-temperature treatments caused reduced solubility of several metals, and the loss of some volatile species (rhenium and tellurium). Sample preparation reproducibility was high (the inter- and intra-batch relative standard deviations were 7.8 and 0.84 %, respectively) indicating suitability for use as a working standard for analytical methods development. We anticipate future standardized radionuclide-loaded materials will find use in radioanalytical methods development and/or serve as a starting material for the synthesis of more complex nuclear explosion debris forms (e.g., Trinitite).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glasstone S, Dolan PJ (1977) The effects of nuclear weapons, 3rd edn. US Department of Defense and the Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams CE, Farlow NH, Schell WR (1960) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 18:42–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benson P, Gleit CE, Leventhal L (1965) In: Klement AW, Jr (ed) Radioactive fallout from nuclear weapons tests. Proceedings of the 2nd conference, Germantown, 3–6 Nov 1964. Fallout Studies Branch, Division of Biology and Medicine, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission

  4. Committee on the Effects of Nuclear Earth-penetrator and Other Weapons (2005) Effects of nuclear earth-penetrator and other weapons. National Research Academies, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, p 52

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hawthorne SB, Miller DJ, Burford MD, Langenfeld JJ, Eckert-Tilotta S, Louie PK (1993) J Chromatogr 642:301–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harvey SD, Fellows RJ, Cataldo DA, Bean RM (1990) J Chromatogr 518:361–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Brien MJ, Grob RL (1978) J Chromatogr 155:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harvey SD, Wenzel TJ (2008) J Chromatogr A 1192:212–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hauck HE, Mack M, Jost W (1991) In: Sherma J, Fried B (eds) Handbook of thin-layer chromatography, Chromatographic Science Series, vol 55. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 106

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aitzetmüller K, Goncalves LAG (1990) J Chromatogr 519:349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vardoulakis E, Karamanis D, Assimakopoulos MN, Boemi SN, Mihalakakou G (2011) Int J Vent 10:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li J-R, Kuppler RJ, Zhou H-C (2009) Chem Soc Rev 38:1477–1504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krenkova J, Foret F, Svec F (2012) J Sep Sci 35:1266–1283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lei C, Shin Y, Liu J, Ackerman E (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:11242–11243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sailor MJ, Park J-H (2012) Adv Mater 24:3779–3802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gu J, Su S, Zhu M, Li Y, Zhao W, Duan Y, Shi J (2012) Microporous Mesoporous Mater 161:160–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Santos AMM, Vasconcelos WL (2000) J Non Cryst Solids 273:145–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schnable R, Langer P (1991) J Chromatogr 544:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tyczkowski J, Kapica R, Lojewska J (2007) Thin Solid Films 515:6590–6595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hadjiev VG, Iliev MN, Vergilov IV (1988) J Phys C Solid State Phys 21:L199–L201

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scott VD, Love G (1983) Quantitative electron-probe microanalysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moore JG (1961) J Inorg Nucl Chem 20:166–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Westphal BR, Batman KJ, Lind RP, Howden KL, Del Cul GD (2005) Fission product removal from spent oxide fuel by head-end processing, Global 2005. Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls

  24. Westpahl BR, Bateman KJ, Herrmann SD (2007) Top ten reasons for DEOX as a front end to pyroprocessing, 2007 ANS Winter Meeting. Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls

    Google Scholar 

  25. Westphal BR, Bateman KJ, Morgan CD, Berg JF, Crane PJ, Cummings DG, Giglio JJ, Huntley MW, Lind RP, Sell DA (2008) Nucl Technol 162:153–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fahey AJ, Zeissler CJ, Newbury DE, Davis J, Lindstrom RM (2010) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:20207–20212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bellucci JJ, Simonetti A (2012) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 293:313–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Beitz JV, Williams CW (2001) Solvent Extr Ion Exc 19:699–723

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Nonproliferation and Engineering, NA-22, supported this work under an Interagency Agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract DE-AC05-75RLO1830. The views, opinions, and findings contained within this paper are those of the authors and should not be construed as an official position, policy, or decision of the DOE or NA-22 unless designated by other documentation. The authors wish to thank Tony Kao of Phenomenex for facilitating purchase of bulk Kinetex HELIC core–shell silica and providing Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller characterization data for this material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott D. Harvey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harvey, S.D., Liezers, M., Antolick, K.C. et al. Porous chromatographic materials as substrates for preparing synthetic nuclear explosion debris particles. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 298, 1885–1898 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-013-2563-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-013-2563-2

Keywords

Navigation