Skip to main content
Log in

A kinetic model for heap leaching of uranium ore considering variation of model parameters with depth of heap

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many kinetic models for heap leaching of low grade ores have been proposed and the model parameters have been treated as constants. However, some of these model parameters change with the depth of the heap. In the present work an apparatus consisted of six columns with different heights was designed and used to simulate the leaching behavior within a 3-m-high uranium ore heap at a uranium mine in South China. It was found that the model parameters α and ω for heap leaching of the uranium ore varied with the depth of the heap, and that the relationships between α and between ω and the depth of the heap were in the form of the logistic and the quadratic functions, respectively. Furthermore, a kinetic model for heap leaching of the uranium ore considering the variation of the model parameters with the depth of the ore was proposed. The kinetic model gave the fitting precision of more than 95 % and prediction precision of more than 93 %. The present work provided an approach for establishing the kinetic model for heap leaching of low grade uranium ores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mousavi SM, Yaghmaei S, Vossoughi M, Jafari A, Hoseini SA (2005) Comparison of bioleaching ability of two native mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria on copper recovery from chalcopyrite concentrate in an airlift bioreactor. Hydrometallurgy 80(1):139–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghorbani Y, Becker M, Mainza A, Franzidis JP, Petersen J (2011) Large particle effects in chemical/biochemical heap leach processes -a review. Miner Eng 24(1):172–1184

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cariaga E, Concha F, Sepulveda M (2005) Flow through porous media with applications to heap leaching of copper ores. Chem Eng J 111(2–3):151–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Watling HR (2006) The bioleaching of sulphide minerals with emphasis on copper sulphides-a review. Hydrometallurgy 84(1–2):81–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Box JC, Prosser AP (1986) A general model for the reaction of several minerals and several reagents in heap and dump leaching. Hydrometallurgy 16:77–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dixon DG, Hendrix JL (1993) A mathematical model for heap leaching of one or more solid reactants from porous ore pellets. Metall Trans 24B:1087–1102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon DG, Hendrix JL (1993) General model for leaching of one or more solid reactants from porous ore pellets. Metall Trans 24B:157–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mellado ME, Cisternas LA (2008) An analytical-numerical method for solving a heap leaching problem of one or more solid reactants from porous pellets. Comput Chem Eng 32(10):2395–2402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mellado ME, Cisternas LA, Gálvez ED (2009) An analytical model approach to heap leaching. Hydrometallurgy 95(1–2):33–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu YL, Ding DX, Li GY, Hu N, Wang YD, Wang YT, Wang QL (2010) Comparative study on the precipitates of chemical leaching and bacterial leaching of uranium ore. Chin J Process Eng 04:679–684

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu AX, Yin SH, Qin WQ, Liu JS, Qiu GZ (2009) The effect of preferential flow on extraction and surface morphology of copper sulphides during heap leaching. Hydrometallurgy 95:76–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bennett CR, McBride D, Cross M, Gebhardt JE (2012) A comprehensive model for copper sulphide heap leaching. Part 1. Basic formulation and validation through column test simulation. Hydrometallurgy 127–128:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lizama HM, Harlamovs JR, McKay DJ, Dai Z (2005) Heap leaching kinetics are proportional to the irrigation rate divided by heap height. Miner Eng 18:623–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sidborn M, Casas J, Martinez J, Moreno L (2003) Two-dimensional dynamic model of copper sulphide ore bed. Hydrometallurgy 71(10):67–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyce WE, Diprima RC (1993) In: Lim usa-Noviega Editors (ed) Ecuaciones Diferenciales y Problemas con Valores en la Frontera. McGraw-Hill, México

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mellado ME, Casanova MP, Cisternas LA, Gálvez ED (2011) On scalable analytical models for heap leaching. Comput Chem Eng 35:220–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gálvez ED, Moreno L, Mellado ME, Ordóñez JI, Cisternas LA (2012) Heap leaching of caliche minerals: phenomenological and analytical models-some comparisons. Miner Eng 33:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10975071).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to De-xin Ding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, Dx., Song, Jb., Ye, Yj. et al. A kinetic model for heap leaching of uranium ore considering variation of model parameters with depth of heap. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 298, 1477–1482 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-013-2522-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-013-2522-y

Keywords

Navigation