The ambient gamma dose-rate and the inventory of fission products estimations with the soil samples collected at Canadian embassy in Tokyo during Fukushima nuclear accident

Article

Abstract

In this study, soil samples were collected at Canadian embassy in Tokyo (about 300 km from Fukushima) on 23 March and 23 May of 2011 for purposes of estimating concentrations of radionuclides in fallout, the total fallout inventory, the depth distribution of radionuclide of interest and the elevated ambient gamma dose-rate at this limited location. Some fission products and actinides were analyzed using gamma-ray spectrometry, alpha spectrometry and liquid scintillation counting. The elevated activity concentration levels of 131I, 132I, 134Cs, 137Cs, 136Cs, 132Te, 129mTe, 129Te, 140Ba and 140La were measured by the gamma-ray spectrometer in the first sample collected on 23 March. Two months after the accident, the 134Cs and 137Cs became only detectable nuclides. A mass relaxation depth of 3.0 g/cm2 was determined by the activities on the depth distribution of 137Cs in a soil core. The total fallout inventory was thus calculated as 225 kBq/m2 on March sampling date and 25 kBq/m2 on May sampling date. The ambient gamma dose-rates in the sampling area estimated by the fallout fission products inventory and 137Cs depth distribution ranged from 184 to 38 nGy/h. There was no detectable americium or plutonium in the soil samples by alpha spectrometry. Although 90Sr or 89Sr were detected supposedly as a result of this accident, it was less than the detection limit, which was about 0.4 Bq/kg in the soil samples.

Keywords

Radionuclide inventory of soil Fukushima nuclear accident Alpha spectrometry Gamma spectrometry Fission products and actinide 

References

  1. 1.
    Grasty RL, Walters BR, Hovgaard J, LaMarre JR (2001) Calibration of a 7.6 × 7.6 cm (3 × 3 inch) sodium iodide gamma ray spectrometer for air kerma rate. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 94(4):309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang W, Korpach W, Rodney B, Kurt U. An automatic in situ field radioactivity surveillance system for gamma air dose-rate measurements and its on-site specific cross calibration using the ground deposition of Fukushima nuclear accident fallout fission products. J Environ Radioact (submitted)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    United Nations (1988) Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation, United Nations scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation 1988 report to the general assembly, United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pacific Northwest Laboratories/Analytical Chemistry Laboratory (PNL/ACL) (1992) Procedure compendium, vol 2: sample preparation methods, PNL-MA-559Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang W, Ungar K, Chen J, St-Amant N, Tracy BL (2009) An accurate method for the determination of 226Ra activity concentrations in soil. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 280(3):561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Plenteda R (2002) A Monte Carlo based virtual gamma spectroscopy laboratory. PhD thesis, Universitaetsbibliothek der Technischen Universitaet Wien, Resselgasse 4, A-1040. Wien, 118Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zähringer M, Sempau J (1996) The assessment of the representativeness of data from dose rate monitoring stations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 64(4):275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zähringer M and Sempau J (1997), Calibration factors for dose rate probes in environmental monitoring networks obtained from Monte-Carlo-simulations, Fachbereich Strahlenhygiene, Institut fur Atmospharische Radioaktivitat, Report number BfS-IAR-2/97Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Weihua, Bean Marc, Benotto Mike, Cheung Jeff, Ungar Kurt, Ahier Brian (2012) Development of a new aerosol monitoring system and its application in Fukushima nuclear accident related aerosol radioactivity measurement at the CTBT radionuclide station in Sidney of Canada. J Environ Radioact 102:1065–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saito K, Sakamoto R, Nagaoka T, Tsutsumi M, Moriuchi S (1997) Measurements of gamma dose rates in dwellings in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 69(1):61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Currie LA (1968) Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination. Anal Chem 40:586–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allard B, Olofsson U, Torstenfelt R (1984) Environmental actinide chemistry. Inorg Chim Acta 94:205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radiation Protection BureauHealth CanadaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)RichlandUSA

Personalised recommendations