Sorption of europium by malt spent rootlets, a low cost biosorbent: effect of pH, kinetics and equilibrium studies

  • V. A. Anagnostopoulos
  • B. D. SymeopoulosEmail author


The uptake of lanthanide elements by naturally abundant materials, is a matter of great economic and environmental interest. This study is an exploration of the potential utilization of malt spent rootlets (MSR), which are by-products of malting process, for a cost effective pre-concentration of Eu(III). The effect of solution pH, contact time and initial concentration under constant ionic strength and temperature were studied. Kinetic data were applied to pseudo-first, second order and Elovich equations, as well as intra-particle diffusion model. Pseudo-second order and Elovich equation seem to fit our data equally well, whereas diffusion contributes to the whole process. Equilibrium data were evaluated using Langmuir, Freundlich and Dubinin-Radushkevich equations. According to Langmuir model, which fits the data better, europium maximum capacities for MSR and active carbon were found 156 and 86 mg/g respectively, indicating that MSR is a promising biosorbent.


Sorption Europium Malt spent rootlets Brewery by-products Rare earth elements 



The authors gratefully acknowledge Professor P. Ioannou for improving the text, as well as the help of Athenian Brewery S. A. and namely the Patras Brewery Manager, Mr. Vasileios Georgopoulos and the Head of Malting and Brewing Mr. Athanasios Gioulis. This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund—ERDF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Regional Operational Programme” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program: Support for research, technology and innovation actions in Region of Western Greece.


  1. 1.
    Naja GM, Volesky B (2009) Treatment of metal-bearing effl uents: removal and recovery. Taylor & Francis and CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad WA, Jaapar J, Mior Ahmad KMZ (2004) Removal of heavy metals from wastewater. In: Pandey A (ed) Concise encyclopedia of bioresource technology. The Haworth Press Inc., New York, pp 152–157Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Naja G, Murphy V, Volesky B (2009) Biosorption, metals. In: Flickinger MC (ed) Encyclopedia of industrial biotechnology bioprocess, bioseparation and cell technology. Wiley, New York, p 4500Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Volesky B (2003) Sorption and biosorption. SV Sorbex Inc., MontrealGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garnham GW (1997) In: Wase J, Forster C (eds) Biosorbent for metal ions. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang J, Chen C (2009) Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol Adv 27:195–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGill I (2005) Rare earth elements, in ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haxel G, Hedrick J, Orris J (2006) Rare earth elements critical resources for high technology. United States Geological Survey, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vlachou A, Symeopoulos BD, Koutinas AA (2009) A comparative study of neodymium sorption by yeast cells. Radiochim Acta 97:437–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Markai S, Andrès Y, Montavon G, Grambow B (2003) Study of the interaction between europium (III) and Bacillus subtilis: fixation sites, biosorption modeling and reversibility. J Colloid Interf Sci 262:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Konstantinou M, Kolokassidou K, Pashalidis I (2007) Sorption of Cu(II) and Eu(III) ions from aqueous solution by olive cake. Adsorption 13:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anagnostopoulos V, Symeopoulos B (2008) A preliminary study of europium uptake by yeast cells. The case of Kluveromyces Marxianus. AIP Conf Proc 1036:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baybas D, Ulusoy U (2011) Polyacrylamide-clinoptilolite/Y-zeolite composites: characterization and adsorptive features for terbium. J Hazard Mater 187:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sasahara A, Matsumura T, Nicolaou G, Papaioannou D (2004) Neutron and gamma ray source evaluation of LWR high burn-up UO2 and MOX spent fuels. J Nucl Sci Technol 41:448–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Low KS, Lee CK, Liew SC (2000) Sorption of cadmium and lead from aqueous solutions by spent grain. Process Biochem 36:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lu S, Gibb SW (2008) Copper removal from wastewater using spent-grain as biosorbent. Bioresource Technol 99:1509–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marczenko Z (1986) Separation and spectrophotometric determination of elements. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Larkin P (2011) Infrared and Raman spectroscopy; principles and spectral interpretation. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Laus R, Geremias R, Vasconcelos HL, Laranjeira MC, Favere VT (2007) Reduction of acidity and removal of metal ions from coal mining effluents using chitosan microspheres. J Hazard Mater 149:471–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ho YS, Ng JCY, McKay G (2000) Kinetics of pollutant sorption by biosorbents: review. Separ Purif Method 29:189–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang J, Stanforth R (2005) Slow adsorption reaction between arsenic species and goethite (α-FeOOH): diffusion or heterogeneous surface reaction control. Langmuir 21:2895–2901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weber WJ, Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J Sanit Eng Div Am Soc Civ Eng 89:31–60Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Svilovic S, Rusic D, Basic A (2010) Investigations of different kinetic models of copper ions sorption on zeolite 13X. Desalination 259:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Foo KY, Hameed BH (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156:2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radiochemistry Lab, Department of ChemistryUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations