Abstract
Uranium silicide (U3Si2), 20% 235U enriched powder, is an intermetallic compound used as nuclear fuel material, which is the state-of-the-art among nuclear fuel materials used in modern research reactors. It is produced by IPEN and used as nuclear fuel of the IEA-R1 reactor (IPEN/CNEN, São Paulo, Brazil); U3Si2 has 92.3 wt% Utotal and 7.7 wt% Si. The qualification of this material requires chemical and physical tests such as Si and Utotal content, isotope ratio, impurities, density, specific surface area and particle size determination. The Si and Utotal were determined by gravimetric and volumetric procedures. Usually, these classical methods require a long time for analyses and are expensive. The objective of this study was to establish a fast and efficient analytical method to meet ISO/IEC 17025:2005 requirements in the Si and Utotal determination. The X-ray fluorescence techniques (XRF) were chosen to allow a direct and non-destructive analysis, what is the main advantage compared to other instrumental techniques, since previous chemical treatments are not necessary. In this study, the performance of the wavelength dispersive (WDXRF) and energy dispersive (EDXRF) X-ray fluorescence techniques was evaluated. Furthermore, two different sample preparation procedures, plain powdered and pressed powdered, were evaluated. Statistical tools were used to evaluate the results and a comparison between these results and the conventional methods was done.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- WDXRF:
-
Wavelength dispersion X-ray fluorescence
- EDXRF:
-
Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence
- FP:
-
Fundamental parameters method
- PL:
-
Plain powdered
- PR:
-
Pressed powdered
- CC:
-
Calibration curve
- Xv:
-
Volumetric method
- Xg:
-
Gravimetric method
- IPEN:
-
Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares
- CQMA:
-
Centro de Química e Meio Ambiente
- CCN:
-
Centro do Combustível Nuclear
- PLPF:
-
Loose powdered sample with fundamental parameters method
- PRCC:
-
Pressed powered samples with calibration curve method
- RSD%:
-
Relative standard deviation
- ER%:
-
Relative error
- QL:
-
Limit of quantification
References
Saliba Silva AM, Durazzo M, Carvalho EFU, Riella HG (2007) Fabrication of U3Si2 powder for fuels in IEA-R1 nuclear research reactor. Mater Sci Forum J 591–593
Müller DM (1972) Spectrochemical analysis by X-ray fluorescence. Plenum, New York
Tertian R, Claisse F (1982) Principles of quantitative X-ray fluorescence analysis. Heyden, London
Scapin MA (2003) Application of X ray diffraction and fluorescence (WDXRF): clay minerals test. BDTD. http://bdtd.ibict.br/. Accessed 30 Sept 2008
INMETRO (1998) Guia para a expressão da incerteza de medição. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
INMETRO (2003) Orientações sobre validação de métodos de ensaios químicos. DOQ-CGCRE-008. São Paulo. http://www.inmetro.gov.br/Sidoq/Arquivos/CGCRE/DOQ/DOQ-CGCRE-8_02.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2007
Scapin MA (2008) Inorganic elements and organic compounds degradation studies by gamma irradiation in used lubricating oils. BDTD. http://bdtd.ibict.br/. Accessed 30 Mar 2009
Rousseau R (2001) Detection limit and estimate of uncertainty of analytical XRF results. Rigaku J 18. http://www.msc.com/downloads/journal/online-contents.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scapin, M.A., Salvador, V.L.R., Cotrim, M.E.B. et al. Uncertainty measurement evaluation of WDXRF and EDXRF techniques for the Si and Utotal determination in U3Si2 nuclear fuel. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 287, 807–811 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0897-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0897-6