Skip to main content
Log in

Round robin for uranium isotopic measurements by mass spectrometry

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A round-robin for uranium isotopic analysis in two solutions with different concentrations prepared and certified by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM, Geel, Belgium) was organized by CETAMA, a division of the Commissariat à l’Énergie Atomique (CEA: French Atomic Energy Commission Fourteen laboratories took part in the program using twenty-five different instruments (ICP-QMS, ICP-SFMS and TIMS). For each solution and each isotopic ratio, a statistical analysis based on standard ISO 5725 was carried out to calculate the mean, the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations, the z-score and zeta-score, the bias with respect to the target values, and to compare their precision. The mean measurement results for the 234U/238U and 235U/238U isotopic ratios show no significant biases compared with the target values, whatever is the analytical technique. The results were much less satisfactory for the 236U/238U isotopic ratio, for which only the laboratories specialized in traces analyses and/or precise isotopic analyses submitted results in good agreement with the target values. A detailed discussion is given in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Steier, R. Golser, W. Kutschera, V. Liechtenstein, A. Priller, A. Valenta, C. Vockenhuber, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res., B188 (2002) 283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. F. Boulyga, J. L. Matusevich, V. P. Mironov, V. P. Kudrjashov, L. Halicz, I. Segal, J. A. McLean, A. Montaser, J. S. Becker, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 17 (2002) 958.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. L. Callis, R. M. Abernathey, Intern. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc., 103 (1991) 93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. S. Cohen, N. S. Belshaw, R. K. O’Nions, Intern. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Proc., 116 (1992) 71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. K. Sahoo, H. Yomehara, K. Kurotaki, K. Fujimoto, Y. Nakamura, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 252 (2002) 241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Richter, S. A. Goldberg, Intern. J. Mass Spectrom., 229 (2003) 181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. S. Becker, H. J. Dietze, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 14 (1999) 1493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Turner, P. Van Calsteren, N. Vigier, L. Thomas, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 16 (2001) 612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Pointurier, N. Baglan, P. Hémet, Appl. Radiation Isotopes, 60 (2003) 561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Baglan, P. Hémet, F. Pointurier, R. Chiappini, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 261 (2004) 609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Yoshida, Y. Muramatsu, K. Togami, S. Uchida, T. Ban-mai, H. Yomehara, S. Sahoo, J. Environ. Radioact., 50 (2000) 161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. E. Ketterer, J. A. Jordan, S. C. Szechenyi, D. D. Hudson, R. R. Layman, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 15 (2000) 1569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. E. Howe, C. M. Davidson, M. McCartney, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 17 (2002) 497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Pointurier, A. Hubert, N. Baglan, P. Hémet, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 276 (2008) 505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Wellum, A. Alonso, W. De Bolle, A. Held, A. Verbruggen, Proc. of the Intern. Conf. on Advances in Destructive and Non-Destructive Analysis for Environmental Monitoring and Nuclear Forensics, Karlsruhe, 21–23 October 2002, p. 381 (IAEA-CN-98/30P).

  16. G. Granier, Note Technique CEA/DCRP/CETAMA/2007/05 “Synthèse de circuit interlaboratoires uranium — isotopie et pondéral — et radium-226”, 01 March 2007.

  17. CEA/DCRP/CETAMA, Method 391 “Détermination de l’isotopie de l’uranium par ICP-MS”.

  18. ISO 5725, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results.

  19. M. Thirlwall, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 16 (2001) 1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Richter, A. Alonso, W. De Bolle, H. Kühn, A. Verbruggen, R. Wellum, P. D. P. Taylor, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 20 (2005) 1381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. F. Boulyga, U. Klötzli, T. Prohaska, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 21 (2006) 1427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. ISO/DIS 13528, Statistical Methods for Use in Proficiency Testing by Interlaboratory Comparisons.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Granier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Granier, G., Pointurier, F. & Chartier, F. Round robin for uranium isotopic measurements by mass spectrometry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 279, 875–884 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-008-7392-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-008-7392-3

Keywords

Navigation