Abstract
Open front hoods are routinely used to mitigate a worker’s inhalation hazard. However, it has been shown that these hoods leak contaminates, especially when a worker is performing work in the hood. Quantitative measurement performed in the past does not reflect actually working conditions, but instead tends to conservatively bias the measurement by placing the sampler inside the hood or forcing the air-stream out of the hood toward the sampler. In order to accurately measure the amount of material routinely leaking from an open front hood, an air sampler was positioned in front of the hood opening and samples were taken while a routine sample digestion process was done. The digestion process involved the heating of a surrogate mixture to dryness. Samples were taken with and without a worker present during the digestion process. The samples were then analyzed at the University of Texas using neutron activation analysis. The detection level using this method was low enough to measure the amount of aerosol escaping the hood. Based on these measurements, the capture efficiency of open front hoods for PuO2 is 84%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Summary of Radiological Incident Reports, 2004.
A. E. Johnson, B. Fletcher, Safety Sci., 24 (1996) 51.
K. Maupins, D. Hitchings, Amer. Ind. Hygiene Assoc. J., 59 (1998) 133.
S. E. Guffey, N. Barnea, Amer. Ind. Hygiene Assoc. J., 55 (1994) 132.
R. K. Bull, D. C. Stevens, M. Marshall, J. Aerosol Sci., 18/3 (1987) 321.
H. Jordan, D. J. Gordon, J. J. Whicker, D. L. Wannigman, Predicting Worker Exposure from a Glove Box Leak, LA-13833-MS, 2001.
N. S. Lan, V. Shekar, Amer. Ind. Hygiene Assoc. J., 62 (2001) 132.
F. Memarzadeh, National Institutes of Health Methodology for Optimization of Laboratory Hood Containment, 1997.
O. G. Raabe, G. J. Newton, C. J. Wilkinson, S. V. Teague, Health Phys., 35 (1978) 649.
M. D. Dorrian, M. R. Bailey, Rad. Prot. Dosim., 60 (1995) 119.
Y. S. Cheng, G. A. Raymond, Y. Zhou, J. Gao, T. Labone, J. J. Whicker, M. D. Hoover, Health Phys., 87 (2004) 596.
L. Kramer, U. Poschl, R. Niessner, J. Aerosol Sci., 31/6 (2000) 673.
H. Shibata, S. Abe, T. Yamaguchi, Proc. 10th Annual Conf. of the Association for Aerosol Research, 1990, p. 242.
Y. Qian, C. Willeke, S. A. Grinshpun, J. Donnelly, C. C. Coffey, Amer. Ind. Hygiene Assoc. J., 59 (1998) 128.
L. M. Brosseau, D. Vesely, N. Rice, K. Goodell, M. Nellis, P. Hairston, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 32/6 (2000) 545.
V. A. Marple, K. L. Rabow, S. M. Behm, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 14 (1991) 434.
W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, 1992, p. 623.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olson, C., Landsberger, S. & Braisted, J. Neutron activation analysis of aerosolized sodium chloride to simulate size-fractionation of plutonium in a glovebox. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 276, 157–160 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-007-0425-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-007-0425-5