Skip to main content

Mechanical performance of modified Polypropylene/Polyamide matrix reinforced with treated recycled carbon fibers for lightweight applications

Abstract

This research paper reports light-weighting future mobility system by modification of recycled carbon fiber composites (RCF). Virgin carbon fiber (VCF) from defense and aerospace sectors needs significant innovation for their high value reutilizations. RCF for composites is at its infancy and fundamental research gap remains to enhance fiber adhesion by its surface science as well as a cost-effective process engineering. A 25% in weight of non-treated versus 400 °C thermally treated VCF and RCF were added in a bi-phase polymer blend of polypropylene (PP) / polyamide 12 (PA12). Results demonstrated 17.7% improved mechanical strength with surface thermodynamics designed with functional maleic anhydride polypropylene (MAPP) and poly[methylene(polyphenyl)isocyanate] (PMPPIC). Characterization methods used included, mechanical properties, XPS, FTIR and SEM. The final recycled carbon fiber reinforced polymer (RCFRP) 20%/80% PP/PA12— PMPPIC has a better impact energy of 16.8% compared to the MAPP RCFRP chemistry without affecting hybrid matrix mechanical strength. Surface design with maleic anhydride functionality enhanced mechanical strength over impact energy for both VCF and RCF composites. Viscosity of the RCFRP composites supports the relationship between viscosity and hybrid matrix polymer adhesion behavior between both surface modifiers used. Finally, the surface energy of the modified composites elucidated the governing mechanism of fiber-matrix adhesion. The fabricated composites are recyclable and meet the stringent light-weighting requirements of many components in mobility vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Alonso E, Lee TM, Bjelkengren C, Roth R, Kirchain RE (2012) Evaluating the potential for secondary mass savings in vehicle lightweighting. Environ Sci Technol 46(5):2893–2901. https://doi.org/10.1021/es202938m

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheah LW (2010) Cars on a diet: the material and energy impacts of passenger vehicle weight reduction in the US (Doctoral dissertation)

  3. Luk JM, Kim HC, Kleine RDD, Wallington TJ, MacLean HL (2018) Greenhouse gas emission benefits of vehicle lightweighting: Monte Carlo probabilistic analysis of the multi material lightweight vehicle glider. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 62:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2014) Progress report on natural fiber reinforced composites 299:9–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pervaiz M, Panthapulakkal S, Sain M, Tjong J (2016) Emerging Trends in Automotive Lightweighting through Novel Composite Materials. Mater Sci Appl 7(1):26

    Google Scholar 

  6. Howarth J, Mareddy SS, Mativenga PT (2014) Energy intensity and environmental analysis of mechanical recycling of carbon fibre composite. J Clean Prod 81:46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.023

  7. Li X, Bai R, McKechnie J (2016) Environmental and financial performance of mechanical recycling of carbon fibre reinforced polymers and comparison with conventional disposal routes. J Clean Prod 127:451–460

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Faruk O, Tjong J, Sain M (eds) (2017) Lightweight and sustainable materials for automotive applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lu JZ, Wu Q, McNabb HS (2007) Chemical coupling in wood fiber and polymer composites: a review of coupling agents and treatments. Wood Fiber Sci 32(1):88–104

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pickering KL, Ji C (2004) The effect of poly [methylene (polyphenyl isocyanate)] and maleated polypropy- lene coupling agents on New Zealand radiata pine fiber–polypropylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 23(18):2011–2024

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fourdeux A, Perret R, Ruland W et al (1971) General structural features of carbon fibers. UK, London, pp 57–62

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang L, Zhong J, Ren X (2017) Natural Fiber-Based Biocomposites, Springer International Publishing

  13. Aranburu N, Eguiazábal JI et al (2015) Improved mechanical properties of compatibilized polypropylene/polyamide-12 blends. International Journal of Polymer Science 2015:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/742540

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jose S, Francis B, Thomas S, Karger-Kocsis J (2006) Morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide 12/polypropylene blends in presence and absence of reactive compatibiliser. Polymer 47(11):3874–3888

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer LO, Schulte K, Grove-Nielsen E (2009) CFRP-recycling following a pyrolysis route: process opti- mization and potentials. J Compos Mater 43(9):1121–1132

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Asmatulu E, Twomey J, Overcash M (2014) Recycling of fiber-reinforced composites and direct structural composite recycling concept. J Compos Mater 48(5):593–608

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McNally T, Boyd P, McClory C, Bien D, Moore I, Millar B, Davidson J, Carrol T et al (2008) Recycled carbon fiber filled polyethylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 107(3):2015–2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.27253

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Akonda MH, Lawrence CA, Weager BM (2012) Recycled carbon fibre-reinforced polypropylene thermoplastic composites. Composites Part A Appl Sci Manufact 43(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.014

  19. Connor ML (2008) Characterization of recycled carbon fibers and their formation of composites using injection molding

  20. Takahashi J, Matsutsuka N, Okazumi T, Uzawa K, Ohsawa I, Yamaguchi K, Kitano A et al (2007) Mechanical properties of recycled CFRP by injection molding method, In: 16th International Conference On Composite Materials, Kyoto, Japan. http://j-t.o.oo7.jp/publications/070713.pdf

  21. Okubo K, Fujii T, Nagata S (2016) Extracting condition of carbon fibers recycled from waste CFRP – appropriate temperature condition in extraction for injection molded polypropylene composite. J Soc Mater Sci Japan 65(8):580–585. https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.65.580

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen R, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2014) Injection-moulded biocomposites from polylactic acid (PLA) and recycled carbon fibre: Evaluation of mechanical and thermal properties. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 27(9):1286–1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705712471360

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stoeffler K, Andjelic S, Legros N, Roberge J, Schougaard SB (2013) Polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) com- posites reinforced with recycled carbon fiber. Compos Sci Technol 84:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.05.005

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Feng N, Wang X, Wu D (2013) Surface modification of recycled carbon fiber and its reinforcement effect on nylon 6 composites: Mechanical properties, morphology and crystallization behaviors. Curr Appl Phys 13(9):2038–2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2013.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ChenY, Wang X, Wu D (2013) Recycled carbon fiber reinforced poly (butylene terephthalate) thermoplastic composites: fabrication, crystallization behaviors and performance evaluation. Polym Adv Technol 24(4):364–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3088

  26. Yan G, Wang X, Wu D (2013) Development of lightweight thermoplastic composites based on poly- carbonate/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer alloys and recycled carbon fiber: Preparation, morphology, and properties. J Appl Polym Sci 129(6):3502–3511. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.39105

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wong KH, Mohammed DS, Pickering SJ et al (2012) Effect of coupling agents on reinforcing potential of recycled carbon fibre for polypropylene composite. Compos Sci Technol 72(7):835–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.02.013

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. DFG DF (2015) 4, 4j-Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and “polymeric”

  29. Maldas D, Kokta BV (1990) Effects of coating treatments on the mechanical behavior of wood-fiber- filled polystyrene composites. I. Use of polyethylene and isocyanate as coating components. J Appl Polym Sci 40 (5–6):917–928

  30. Pimenta S, Pinho ST (2011) Recycling carbon fibre reinforced polymers for structural applications: Technology review and market outlook. Waste Manage 31(2):378–392

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Krekel G, Huttinger KJ, Hoffman WP, Silver DS (1994) The relevance of the surface structure and surface chemistry of carbon fibres in their adhesion to high-temperature thermoplastics. J Mater Sci 29(11):2968–2980. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01117609

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pimenta S, Pinho ST (2012) The effect of recycling on the mechanical response of carbon fibres and their composites. Compos Struct 94(12):3669–3684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Graziano A, Jaffer S, Sain M (2019) Review on modification strategies of polyethylene/polypropylene im- miscible thermoplastic polymer blends for enhancing their mechanical behavior. J Elastomers Plast 51(4):291–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095244318783806

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Siročić AP, Hrnjak-Murgić Z, Jelenčić J (2013) The surface energy as an indicator of miscibility of SAN/EDPM polymer blends. J Adhes Sci Technol 27(24):2615–2628. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2013.796279

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stelescu DM, Airinei A, Homocianu M, Fifere N, Timpu D, Aflori M (2013) Structural characteristics of some high-density polyethylene/EPDM blends. Polym Testing 32(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.10.010

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jia S, Zhu Y, Wang Z, Chen L, Fu L (2015) Influences of PP-g-MA on the surface free energy, morphologies and mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane/polypropylene blends. J Polym Res 22(8):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. van de Werken N, Reese MS, Taha MR, Tehrani M (2019) Investigating the effects of fiber surface treatment and alignment on mechanical properties of recycled carbon fiber composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 119:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.012

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fu SY, Lauke B (1996) Effects of fiber length and fiber orientation distributions on the tensile strength of short-fiber-reinforced polymers. Compos Sci Technol 56(10):1179–1190

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Garoushi SK (2006) Short Fiber Reinforced Composite: The Effect of Fiber Length and Volume Fraction. J Contemp Dent Pract 7(5):10–17. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-7-5-10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fu YS, Lauke B (1998) The elastic modulus of misaligned short-fiber-reinforced polymers. Compos Sci Technol 58(3):389–400

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jayaraman K, Kortschot MT (1996) Correction to the Fukuda-Kawata Young’s modulus theory and the Fukuda-Chou strength theory for short fibre-reinforced composite materials. J Mater Sci 31(8):2059–2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00356627

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Piggott MR (1994) Short Fibre Polymer Composites: a Fracture-Based Theory of Fibre Reinforcement. J Compos Mater 28(7):588–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839402800701

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Graziano A, Garcia C, Jaffer S, Tjong J, Sain M (2020) Novel functional graphene and its thermodynamic interfacial localization in biphasic polyolefin systems for advanced lightweight applications. Compos Sci Technol 188:107958–107958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107958

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Graziano A, Dias OAT, Garcia C, Jaffer S, Tjong J, Sain M (2020) Impact of Reduced Graphene Oxide on structure and properties of polyethylene rich binary systems for performance-based applications. Polymer 202:122622–122622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122622

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Graziano A, Garcia C, Jaffer S, Tjong J, Yang W, Sain M (2020) Functionally tuned nanolayered graphene as reinforcement of polyethylene nanocomposites for lightweight transportation industry. Carbon 169:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.07.040

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. ASTM International (2015) ASTM D638–14, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. ASTM International.

  47. ASTMS D790 (1997) Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM D790. Annual book of ASTM standards.

  48. Schaeffer SL, Johnson RL, Lewis WB (1998) Impact force comparison of polymers: Molded-notch versus cut-notch using the ASTM D 256 Izod Impact Test Method. J Test Eval 26(2):151–156

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mertz AM, Mix AW, Baek HM, Giacomin AJ (2013) Understanding melt index and ASTM D1238. J Test Eval 41(1):50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. ASTM D7334–08 (2013) Standard Practice for Surface Wettability of Coatings, Substrates and Pigments by Advancing Contact Angle Measurement, in: A.S.T.M. D7334–08. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  51. ASTM D7490–13 (2013) Test Method for Measurement of the Surface Tension of Solid Coatings, Sub- strates and Pigments using Contact Angle Measurements, ASTM International, West, Conshohocken, PA

  52. Rabel W (1971) Einige Aspekte der Benetzungstheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Untersuchung und Verän- derung der Oberflächeneigenschaften von Polymeren. Farbe und Lack 77(10):997–1005

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Owens DK, Wendt RC (1969) Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 13(8):1741–1747. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.070130815

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kaelble DH (1970) Dispersion-Polar Surface Tension Properties of Organic Solids. J Adhes 2(2):66–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0021846708544582

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Graziano A, Dias OAT, Garcia C, Jaffer S, Tjong J, Sain M (2020) Non-Isothermal Crystallization Behavior and Thermal Properties of Polyethylene Tuned by Polypropylene and Reinforced with Reduced Graphene Oxide. Nanomaterials 10(8):1428–1428. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10081428

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Varlet J, Perez J, Vassoille R, Vigier G, Glotin M, Cavaille JY (1993) Microstructure and mechanical properties of isotactic polypropylene (iPP)/polyamide 12 (PA12) blends. J Mater Sci 28(20):5560–5568

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Feng Y, Yang Q, Wang X, Logan BE (2010) Treatment of carbon fiber brush anodes for improving power generation in air–cathode microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 195(7):1841–1844

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Maia BS (2017) Study on the Effect of Surface Energy of Polypropylene/Polyamide12 polymer Hybrid Matrix Reinforced with Virgin and Recycled Carbon Fiber. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/77893

  59. Graziano A, Jaffer S, Sain M (2018) Graphene oxide modification for enhancing high-density polyethylene properties: a comparison between solvent reaction and melt mixing. J Polym Eng 39(1):85–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2018-0106

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee LH (2012) New trends in physics and physical chemistry of polymers, Springer Science & Business Media

  61. Maia BS, Tjong J, Sain M (2019) Material characterization of recycled and virgin carbon fibers for transportation composites lightweighting. Materials Today Sustainability 5:100011–100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2019.100011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research funding acknowledgments to MITACS Accelerate Program and Automotive Partnership Canada Program (APC) funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). This research was supported by: Powertrain Engineering and Research and Development Centre (PERDC)—Ford Canada Special acknowledgment to faculty and staff of University of Toronto, Faculty of Forestry for sharing research background of this project. Finally, a sincere appreciation to Otavio Titton Dias, Antimo Graziano for their support and valuable contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bruno Sena Maia or Mohini Sain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 99 KB)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 44747 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maia, B.S., Behravesh, A.H., Tjong, J. et al. Mechanical performance of modified Polypropylene/Polyamide matrix reinforced with treated recycled carbon fibers for lightweight applications. J Polym Res 29, 136 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-022-02975-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-022-02975-x

Keywords

  • Polymer
  • Carbon fiber
  • Surface modifier
  • Composites
  • Recycled carbon fiber