Abstract
In this paper, the static and dynamic constitutive behavior of aged and unaged virgin PVB were evaluated at different strain rates using static and impact drop-weight testing. The aged virgin PVB was subjected to random environmental conditions of different temperature and moisture levels. All static tests were performed at room temperature ranging between 21 and 32 °C. The results showed that the aged and unaged virgin PVB dynamic constitutive response consists of two linear parts. The first part is linearly elastic and independent of the rate of loading. However, the second linear part was found to be dependent on the strain rate. Aging significantly affected both the static and dynamic constitutive stress-strain relations. Comparing aged and unaged high-strain rate results showed that aging significantly affects the material response of the interlayer materials used in laminated glass, and subsequently, their dynamic response under blast loads. For the aged material tested in this paper, the strain rate effect was found to be less significant in the current test temperature range.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
All the used data and materials are included in this manuscript.
References
Andreozzi L, Briccoli Bati S, Fagone M, Ranocchiai G, Zulli F (2014) Dynamic torsion tests to characterize the thermo-viscoelastic properties of polymeric interlayers for laminated glass. Constr Build Mater
ASTM D638−10 (2010) Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. Annual Book of ASTM Standards
Louter C, Belis J, Veer F, Lebet JP (2012) Durability of SG-laminated reinforced glass beams: Effects of temperature, thermal cycling, humidity and load-duration. Constr Build Mater
Centelles X, Castro JR, Cabeza LF (2019) Experimental results of mechanical, adhesive, and laminated connections for laminated glass elements – A review. Eng Struct
Bedon C (2019) Diagnostic analysis and dynamic identification of a glass suspension footbridge via on-site vibration experiments and FE numerical modelling. Compos Struct
Biolzi L, Cattaneo S, Orlando M, Piscitelli LR, Spinelli P (2018) Post-failure behavior of laminated glass beams using different interlayers. Compos Struct 202:578–589
Biolzi L, Cattaneo S, Orlando M, Piscitelli LR, Spinelli P (2020) Constitutive relationships of different interlayer materials for laminated glass. Compos Struct 244:112221
Centelles X, Martín M, Solé A, Castro JR, Cabeza LF (2020) Tensile test on interlayer materials for laminated glass under diverse ageing conditions and strain rates. Constr Build Mater 243:118230
D’Ambrosio G, Galuppi L, Royer-Carfagni G (2019) A simple model for the post-breakage response of laminated glass under in-plane loading. Compos Struct 230:111426
El-Shami MM, Norville S, Ibrahim YE (2012) Stress analysis of laminated glass with different interlayer materials. Alex Eng J 51(1):61–67
Galuppi L, Royer-Carfagni G (2018) The post-breakage response of laminated heat-treated glass under in plane and out of plane loading. Compos Part B Eng 147:227–239
Hidallana-Gamage HD, Thambiratnam DP, Perera NJ (2015) Influence of interlayer properties on the blast performance of laminated glass panels. Const Build Mater 98:502–518
Liu JC, Yang SG, Yang Y, Fang Q, Rong C, Gan JP (2020) Experimental study of the dynamic response of PVB laminated glass under vented explosion loads of methane–air mixtures. Int J Impact Eng 143:103588
López-Aenlle M, Noriega A, Pelayo F (2019) Mechanical characterization of polyvinil butyral from static and modal tests on laminated glass beams. Compos Part B Eng 169:9–18
Osnes K, Holmen JK, Hopperstad OS, Børvik T (2019) Fracture and fragmentation of blast-loaded laminated glass: An experimental and numerical study. Int J Impact Eng 132:103334
Samieian MA, Cormie D, Smith D, Wholey W, Blackman BRK, Dear JP, Hooper PA (2019) On the bonding between glass and PVB in laminated glass. Eng Fract Mech 214:504–519
Shitanoki Y, Bennison SJ, Koike Y (2015) Structural behavior thin glass ionomer laminates with optimized specific strength and stiffness. Compos Struct 125:615–620
Zhang X, Liu H, Maharaj C, Zheng M, Mohagheghian I, Zhang G, Yan Y, Dear JP (2020) Impact response of laminated glass with varying interlayer materials. Int J Impact Eng 139:103505
Zhao C, Yang J, Wang X, Azim I (2019) Experimental investigation into the post-breakage performance of pre-cracked laminated glass plates. Constr Build Mat 224:996–1006
Hooper P (2011) Blast performance of silicone-bonded laminated glass. Dept Mech Eng
Morison C (2007) The resistance of laminated glass to blast pressure loading and the coefficients for single degree of freedom analysis of laminated glass (PhD thesis). Cranfield University
Nawar M, Salim H, Lusk B, Kiger S (2015) Modeling and Shock Tube Testing of Architectural Glazing Systems for Blast Resistance. J Struct Eng 141(7):4014174
MornGlass (2019) Laminated glass lifetime. <https://www.mornglass.com/laminated-glass-lifetime.html>
Dean B (20210 Effect of water absorption and outdoor weathering on emerging polymer interlayers, MSC Thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia
Elziere P (2017) Laminated Glass: Dynamic Rupture of Adhesion. Polymers. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI
Mooney M (1940) A theory of large elastic deformation. J Appl Phys 11(9)
Ogden R (1984) Non-linear elastic deformations. Engineering Anal Bound Elem 1(2)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El-Sisi, A., Newberry, M., Knight, J. et al. Static and high strain rate behavior of aged virgin PVB. J Polym Res 29, 39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02876-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02876-5