Advertisement

Gas transport and mechanical properties of PDMS-TFS/LDPE nanocomposite membranes

  • Kazem Shahidi
  • Denis RodrigueEmail author
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of trimethylsiloxy fumed silica (TFS) on the mechanical and gas permeation properties of polymer nano-composite membranes. The membranes were produced by coating TFS incorporated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) at different loadings (5, 10 and 15 wt.%) on a porous low density polyethylene (LDPE) substrate which was formed by a melt-extrusion/salt leaching technique. The PDMS-TFS/LDPE membranes were characterized by SEM, TGA and DMTA. The results showed that good affinity between the PDMS treated TFS particles and PDMS matrix was obtained leading to improved mechanical and thermal properties. For gas permeation, CH4 and C3H8 at different upstream pressure (50 to 80 psig) and temperature (27 to 55 °C) were investigated. The results showed that the C3H8/CH4 ideal selectivity (17.6) and C3H8 permeability (1.89 × 104 Barrer) through 10 wt.% TFS loaded membranes (PDMS-TFS10%/LDPE) were 41 and 14% higher than the neat membranes (PDMS-TFS0%/LDPE), respectively. The permeation results also indicate that the performance stability under the conditions investigated makes PDMS-TFS/LDPE membranes interesting for industrial applications.

Keywords

Nano-composite membrane Trimethylsiloxy fumed silica PDMS LDPE Mechanical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Nova Chemicals (Canada), Wacker Silicones Corporation (USA), Tate & Lyle (USA) and Cabot Corporation Product (USA) for providing LDPE pellets, PDMS package, extra fine NaCl particles and TFS particles, respectively.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen XY, Vinh-Thang H, Rodrigue D, Kaliaguine S (2014) Effect of macrovoids in nano-silica/polyimide mixed matrix membranes for high flux CO2/CH4 gas separation. RSC Adv 4:12235–12244.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra47208f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Clippel F, Khan AL, Cano-Odena A et al (2013) CO2 reverse selective mixed matrix membranes for H2 purification by incorporation of carbon–silica fillers. J Mater Chem A 1:945–953.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TA00098A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang J, Li Y, Zhang Z, Hao Z (2015) Mesoporous KIT-6 silica–polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. J Mater Chem A 3:8650–8658.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA07127A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basu BJ, Dinesh Kumar V, Anandan C (2012) Surface studies on superhydrophobic and oleophobic polydimethylsiloxane–silica nanocomposite coating system. Appl Surf Sci 261:807–814.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.08.103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beltran AB, Nisola GM, Cho E et al (2011) Organosilane modified silica/polydimethylsiloxane mixed matrix membranes for enhanced propylene/nitrogen separation. Appl Surf Sci 258:337–345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.08.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin J, Liu Y, Yang W et al (2014) Structure and mechanical properties of the hybrid films of well dispersed SiO2 nanoparticle in polyimide (PI/SiO2) prepared by sol-gel process. J Polym Res 21:531–539.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-014-0531-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim H, Kim H-G, Kim S, Kim SS (2009) PDMS–silica composite membranes with silane coupling for propylene separation. J Membr Sci 344:211–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2009.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shahidi K, Rodrigue D (2017) Production of composite membranes by coupling coating and melt extrusion/salt leaching. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:1306–1315.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Su NC, Smith ZP, Freeman BD, Urban JJ (2015) Size-dependent permeability deviations from Maxwell’s model in hybrid cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol)/silica nanoparticle membranes. Chem Mater 27:2421–2429.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm504463c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silverstein RM, Webster FX, Kiemle DJ (2005) Spectrometric identification of organic compounds7th edn. Wiley, Hoboken ISBN: 978-0-471-39362-7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nisola GM, Beltran AB, Sim DM et al (2011) Dimethyl silane-modified silica in polydimethylsiloxane as gas permeation mixed matrix membrane. J Polym Res 18:2415–2424.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-011-9655-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu Y, Shi Y, Zhang D et al (2013) Preparation and thermal degradation behavior of room temperature vulcanized silicone rubber-g-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes. Polymer (Guildf) 54:6140–6149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLYMER.2013.08.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mora-Barrantes I, Rodríguez A, Ibarra L et al (2011) Overcoming the disadvantages of fumed silica as filler in elastomer composites. J Mater Chem 21:7381.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm10410a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jiang X, Kumar A (2005) Performance of silicone-coated polymeric membrane in separation of hydrocarbons and nitrogen mixtures. J Membr Sci 254:179–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hill RJ (2006) Diffusive permeability and selectivity of nanocomposite membranes. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:6890–6898.  https://doi.org/10.1021/IE0512035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shahidi K, Rodrigue D (2018) Permeability and thermal properties of PDMS/LDPE multilayer composite membranes. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 56:1045–1052.  https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alentiev A, Yampolskii Y (2013) Correlation of gas permeability and diffusivity with selectivity: orientations of the clouds of the data points and the effects of temperature. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:8864–8874.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie302680r CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversité LavalQuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations