Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of experimental parameters and the copolymer structure on the size control of nanospheres in double emulsion method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymer Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poly(lactide-ethylene glycol) (PLEG) and poly(lactide-methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)) (MePLEG) nanospheres used as drug carrier were prepared by a double emulsion method. The influences of several parameters, such as copolymer structure, phase volume ratios, emulsifer concentration and sonication parameters, on the preparation of these two copolymer nanospheres were investigated for the nanospheres control. Critical values of the emulsifer concentration and the sonication intensity exist, allowing optimization of the nanospheres of controlled size with a narrow distribution. Under the same condition, MePLEG nanospheres had a smaller size than PLEG nanospheres because of their different length of hydrophilic blocks and steric hindrance. In addition, vascular endothelial cell growth factor and cisplatin, as two water-soluble model drugs, were encapsulated in the MePLEG and PLEG nanospheres. A higher encapsulation efficiency, above 90%, of the PLEG nanospheres could be obtained than that of the MePLEG nanospheres because of their different hydrophilic blocks structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Scheme 2
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perrault SD, Walkey C, Jennings T, Fischer HC, Chan WCW (2009) Nano Lett 9:1909–1915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng J, Teply BA, Sherifi I, Sung J, Luther G, Gu FX, Levy-Nissenbaum E, Radovic-Moreno AF, Langer R, Farokhzad OC (2007) Biomaterials 28:869–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mundargi RC, Babu VR, Rangaswamy V, Patel P, Aminabhavi TM (2008) J Control Release 125:193–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou SB, Liao XY, Li XH, Deng XM, Li H (2003) J Control Release 86:195–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Luan XS, Skupin M, Siepmann J, Bodmeier R (2006) Int J Pharm 324:168–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang YY, Chung TS, Ng NP (2001) Biomaterials 22:231–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cerrai P, Tricoli M, Lelli L, Guerra GD, Sbarbati Del Guerra R, Cascone MG, Giusti P (1994) J Mater Sci-Mater M 5:308–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu KJ, Lin X, Yang S (1990) J Appl Polym Sci 39:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prabha S, Zhou WZ, Panyam J, Labhasetwar V (2002) Int J Pharm 244:105–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma LL, Jie P, Venkatraman SS (2008) Adv Funct Mater 18:716–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao XL, Tao WX, Lu W, Zhang QZ, Zhang Y, Jiang XG, Fu SK (2006) Biomaterials 27:3482–3490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vila A, Gill H, McCallion O, Alonso MJ (2004) J Control Release 98:231–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dong YC, Feng SS (2004) Biomaterials 25:2843–2849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zambaux MF, Bonneaux F, Gref R, Dellacherie E, Vigneron C (2001) Int J Pharm 212:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arvind KJ, Amit KG, Prem NG, Kapil K, Neeraj M, Abhinav M, Sharad M, Suresh PV (2009) J Control Release 136:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang ZY, Zhao YM, Wang F (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 102:577–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Quellec P, Gref R, Perrin L, Dellacherie E, Sommer F, Verbavatz JM, Alonso MJ (1998) J Biomed Mater Res 42:45–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chognot D, Leonard M, Six JL, Dellacherie E (2006) Colloid Surf B 51:86–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun X, Duan YR, He Q, Lu H, Zhang ZR (2005) Chem Pharm Bull 53:599–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zambaux MF, Bonneaux F, Gref R, Dellacherie E, Vigneron C (1999) J Biomed Mater Res 44:109–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ficheux MF, Bonakdar L, Leal-Calderon F, Bibette J (1998) Langmuir 14:2702–2706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zambaux MF, Bonneaux F, Gref R, Maincent P, Dellacherie E, Alonso MJ, Labrude P, Vigneron C (1998) J Control Release 50:31–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bilati U, Allemann E, Doelker E (2003) Pharm Dev Technol 8:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kang SW, Lim HW, Seo SW, Jeon O, Lee M, Kim BS (2008) Biomaterials 29:1109–1117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ye L, Haider HK, Tan R, Su L, Law PK, Zhang W, Sim EKW (2008) Biomaterials 29:2125–2137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Avgoustakisa K, Beletsia A, Panagia Z, Klepetsanisa P, Karydasb AG, Ithakissios DS (2002) J Control Release 79:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 30600751 and 30772349), Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai (Project No. 05XD14015) and Shanghai Education Committee (Project No. 09YZ103). We thank Instrumental Analysis Center of Shanghai Jiao Tong University for the help in characterization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weibin Shi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, B., Dou, H., Tao, K. et al. Influence of experimental parameters and the copolymer structure on the size control of nanospheres in double emulsion method. J Polym Res 18, 131–137 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-010-9399-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-010-9399-z

Keywords

Navigation