Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of composition and sequence distribution of p(AM-MADQUAT) prepared by solution and inverse microemulsion polymerization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymer Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acrylamide (AM)/2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyltrimethylammonium chloride (MADQUAT) copolymers were prepared by solution and inverse microemulsion polymerization using ammonium persulfate ((NH4)2S2O8)/sodium hydrosulfite (NaHSO3) as redox initiator at 30 °C. The comonomer reactivity ratios, determined using the Kelen–Tudos (KT) method, were r A = 0.30, r M = 1.31 in solution and r A = 0.63, r M = 1.13 in the inverse microemulsion, respectively. The copolymer microstructure was deduced from the run number and the heterogeneity, based on reactivity ratios. It was found that copolymerization in the inverse microemulsion resulted in close to ideal copolymerization, giving almost random copolymers; copolymerization in solution resulted in some alternating copolymers. The copolymer compositions indicated that high-conversion samples obtained from the inverse microemulsion are much more homogeneous in composition compared with those obtained in solution. It was found that the composition distribution of the copolymer prepared by inverse microemulsion polymerization remained at approximately the feed ratio. The sequence distribution of the copolymer was predicted by first-order Markov statistical and Bernoulli statistical models, respectively. The results showed that the sequence distribution of the copolymer prepared by inverse microemulsion polymerization was almost random, which led to a wider cationic charge distribution and a microstructure that was coincident with the feed ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Krevelen DW (1990) Properties of polymers: their correlation with chemical structure; their estimation and prediction from additive group contribution. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  2. Vijayanand PS, Kato S, Satokawa S et al (2007) Eur Polym J 43(5):2046–2056. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.01.042

    Google Scholar 

  3. Finemann M, Ross SD (1950) Polym Sci A 5(2):259–262. doi:10.1002/pol.1950.120050210

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kelen T, Tudos F (1975) J Macromol Sci Chem A9(1):35–64

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tidwell PW, Mortimer GA (1965) J Polym Sci A 3(1):369–387. doi:10.1002/pol.1965.100030137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mao R, Huglin MB (1993) Polymer (Guildf) 34(8):1709–1715. doi:10.1016/0032-3861(93)90331-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurenkov VF, Myagchnkov VA (1980) Eur Polym J 16(12):1229–1239. doi:10.1016/0014-3057(80)90030-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Touchal S, Jonquières A, Clément R et al (2004) Polymer (Guildf) 45(25):8311–8322. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.068

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sanghvi PG, Patel AC, Gopalkrishan KS et al (2000) Eur Polym J 36(10):2275–2283. doi:10.1016/S0014-3057(00)00002-1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xu XL, Ge XW, Zhang ZC, Zhang MW (1997) Polymer (Guildf) 39(22):5321–5325

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ponratnam S, Kapur SL (1977) Makromol Chem 178(4):1029–1038. doi:10.1002/macp.1977.021780408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka H (1986) Polym Sci Polym Chem Ed 24(1):29–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kozakiewicz JJ, Lipp DW (1990) EU 374457 (1990-06-27)

  14. Odian G (1970) Chapter 6. In: Principles of polymerization. McGraw-Hill, New York

  15. Kelen T, Tudos F, Foldes-Berezsich T et al (1977) J Polym Sci Polym Chem Ed 15(12):3047–3074

    Google Scholar 

  16. Candau F, Pabon M, Anquetil JY (1999) Colloid Surf A 153(1):47–59. doi:10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00425-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harwood HJ, Ritchey WM (1964) Polym Lett 2:601–607. doi:10.1002/pol.1964.110020607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Corrandini P, Tosi C (1968) Eur Polym J 4(5):227–238. doi:10.1016/0014-3057(68)90035-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support given to this work by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (20031018) and the Key Technologies Program of Shanxi Province (2006031139).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shen Yinghua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aiqin, Z., Yinghua, S., Xiangying, Z. et al. A comparison of composition and sequence distribution of p(AM-MADQUAT) prepared by solution and inverse microemulsion polymerization. J Polym Res 17, 11–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-009-9284-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-009-9284-9

Keywords

Navigation