Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that whereas occupying high peer status promotes adolescents’ well-being, feeling dominated by friends confers psychological costs. However, little is known about day-to-day power dynamics of adolescents’ friendships or their acute affective consequences. This 14-day intensive longitudinal study introduced novel daily assessments of friend dominance and friendship clout, examined their associations with mood, and tested anxiety as a moderator. Participants were 195 11th-graders (Mage = 16.48, SDage = 0.35; 66% female). Multilevel models revealed that adolescents experienced worse mood on days they felt dominated by friends and better mood on days they felt powerful and influential among friends. Associations with negative mood were strongest for adolescents higher in anxiety. The findings underscore the dynamic nature of power in adolescents’ friendships.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, N. C. Z., Hanish, L. D., & Pepler, D. J. (2021). A dyadic perspective on aggressive behavior between friends. Aggressive Behavior, 47(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21938.
Andrews, N. C. Z., McDowell, H., Spadafora, N., & Dane, A. V. (2022). Using social network position to understand early adolescents’ power and dominance within a school context. School Psychology, 37(6), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000445.
Bagwell, C. L., & Bukowski, W. M. (2018). Friendship in childhood and adolescence: Features, effects, and processes. In Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups, 2nd ed (pp. 371–390). The Guilford Press.
Bai, S., & Repetti, R. L. (2018). Negative and positive emotion responses to daily school problems: links to internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(3), 423 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0311-8.
Benson, B. E., Guyer, A. E., Nelson, E. E., Pine, D. S., & Ernst, M. (2015). Role of contingency in striatal response to incentive in adolescents with anxiety. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(1), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0307-6.
Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1447–1460. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130071.
Bowker, J. C., & Weingarten, J. (2022). Temporal approaches to the study of friendship: Understanding the developmental significance of friendship change during childhood and adolescence. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 63, 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2022.04.005.
Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. (2008). The Network of Relationships Inventory: Relationships Qualities Version. [Unpublished measure].
Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time.
Carthy, T., Horesh, N., Apter, A., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Patterns of emotional reactivity and regulation in children with anxiety disorders. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9167-8.
Dawes, M., & Xie, H. (2014). The role of popularity goal in early adolescents’ behaviors and popularity status. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032999.
Ebesutani, C., Regan, J., Smith, A., Reise, S., Higa-McMillan, C., & Chorpita, B. F. (2012). The 10-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children, child and parent shortened versions: Application of item response theory for more efficient assessment. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-011-9273-2.
Ellis, W. E., Dumas, T. M., Hutchinson, L. R., & Talebi, S. (2022). Staying safe or staying popular? Popularity and reputation concerns predict adherence and adjustment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Youth & Society, 0044118X221074383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X221074383
Etkin, R. G., & Bowker, J. C. (2023). Bidirectional associations between friend overprotection and psychosocial adjustment during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01741-6
Farmer, A. S., & Kashdan, T. B. (2015). Stress sensitivity and stress generation in Social Anxiety Disorder: a temporal process approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000036.
Farmer, T. W., Hamm, J. V., Dawes, M., Barko-Alva, K., & Cross, J. R. (2019). Promoting inclusive communities in diverse classrooms: Teacher attunement and social dynamics management. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1635020.
Faur, S., Laursen, B., & Juvonen, J. (2023). Adolescents with few friend alternatives are particularly susceptible to influence from friends. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(3), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01718-x.
Flannery, K. M., & Smith, R. L. (2017). Are peer status friendship quality and friendship stability equivalent markers of social competence? Adolescent Research Review, 2(4), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-016-0042-z.
Forgas, J. P. (2013). Don’t worry, be sad! On the cognitive, motivational, and interpersonal benefits of negative mood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412474458.
Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138.
Goodman, E., Adler, N. E., Kawachi, I., Frazier, A. L., Huang, B., & Colditz, G. A. (2001). Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108(2), e31 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.2.e31.
Hartup, W. W. (1992). Conflict and friendship relations. In Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 186–215). Cambridge University Press.
Heeren, A., Dricot, L., Billieux, J., Philippot, P., Grynberg, D., de Timary, P., & Maurage, P. (2017). Correlates of social exclusion in Social Anxiety Disorder: an fMRI study. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00310-9.
Heffer, T., & Willoughby, T. (2020). Sensitivity to negative feedback among children and adolescents: an ERP study comparing developmental differences between high-worriers and low-worriers. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20(3), 624–635. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00791-8.
Heffer, T., & Willoughby, T. (2021). A person-centered examination of emotion dysregulation, sensitivity to threat, and impulsivity among children and adolescents: an ERP study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 47, 100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100900.
Heilbron, N., & Prinstein, M. J. (2010). Adolescent peer victimization, peer status, suicidal ideation, and nonsuicidal self-injury. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (Wayne State University. Press), 56(3), 388–419. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0049.
Humenny, G., Grygiel, P., Dolata, R., & Świtaj, P. (2021). Peer network status and depressive symptoms among early adolescents: testing the mediating effects of metaperception and loneliness. School Mental Health, 13(2), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-020-09409-3.
Joffer, J., Flacking, R., Bergström, E., Randell, E., & Jerdén, L. (2019). Self-rated health, subjective social status in school and socioeconomic status in adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 785. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7140-3.
Kessel, E. M., Kujawa, A., Proudfit, G. H., & Klein, D. N. (2015). Neural reactivity to monetary rewards and losses differentiates social from generalized anxiety in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 56(7), 792–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12355.
Koski, J. E., Xie, H., & Olson, I. R. (2015). Understanding social hierarchies: the neural and psychological foundations of status perception. Social Neuroscience, 10(5), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1013223.
Leggett-James, M. P., Faur, S., Kaniušonytė, G., Žukauskienė, R., & Laursen, B. (2023). The perils of not being attractive or athletic: pathways to adolescent adjustment difficulties through escalating unpopularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01835-1
Liang, W., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, C., & Chen, J. (2023). Clique hierarchy moderates the association between social preference and defending behaviors in early adolescence: the role of gender differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(11), 2285–2299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01825-3.
Modecki, K. L., Goldberg, R. E., Ehrenreich, S. E., Russell, M., & Bellmore, A. (2019). The practicalities and perils of ambulatory assessment’s promise: Introduction to a special section. Journal of Research on Adolescence: The Official Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 29(3), 542–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12532.
Morgan, J. K., Lee, G. E., Wright, A. G. C., Gilchrist, D. E., Forbes, E. E., McMakin, D. L., Dahl, R. E., Ladouceur, C. D., Ryan, N. D., & Silk, J. S. (2017). Altered positive affect in clinically anxious youth: the role of social context and anxiety subtype. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(7), 1461–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0256-3.
Ng, J. Y. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: a meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309.
Prinstein, M. J., Rancourt, D., Adelman, C. B., Ahlich, E., Smith, J., & Guerry, J. D. (2018). Peer status and psychopathology. In Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups, 2nd ed (pp. 617–636). The Guilford Press.
Richey, J. A., Brewer, J. A., Sullivan-Toole, H., Strege, M. V., Kim-Spoon, J., White, S. W., & Ollendick, T. H. (2019). Sensitivity shift theory: a developmental model of positive affect and motivational deficits in social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 72, 101756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101756.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.
Saulnier, K. G., Saulnier, S. J., & Allan, N. P. (2022). Cognitive risk factors and the experience of acute anxiety following social stressors: an ecological momentary assessment study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 88, 102571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102571.
Schacter, H. L., Hoffman, A. J., & Ehrhardt, A. D. (2023). The power dynamics of friendship: Between- and within- person associations among friend dominance, self-esteem, and adolescent internalizing symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(6), 1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01763-0.
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
Stone, L. B., Mennies, R. J., Waller, J. M., Ladouceur, C. D., Forbes, E. E., Ryan, N. D., Dahl, R. E., & Silk, J. S. (2019). Help me feel better! Ecological momentary assessment of anxious youths’ emotion regulation with parents and peers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-018-0454-2.
Sullivan, H. S. (Ed.). (1953). The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315014029
Sweeting, H., & Hunt, K. (2014). Adolescent socio-economic and school-based social status, health and well-being. Social Science & Medicine, 121, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.037.
Updegraff, K. A., Helms, H. M., McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., Thayer, S. M., & Sales, L. H. (2004). Who’s the boss? Patterns of perceived control in adolescents’ friendships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(5), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000037633.39422.b0.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
Young, J. T. N. (2014). Role magnets”? An empirical investigation of popularity trajectories for life-course persistent individuals during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9946-0.
Acknowledgements
We thank the adolescents and schools that participated in this research. Thank you also to the graduate and undergraduate research assistants who contributed to data collection, cleaning, and coding.
Authors’ Contributions
H.L.S. conceived of the study, coordinated study design and data collection, developed the hypotheses, performed the statistical analyses, and led the writing of the manuscript; A.D.E. participated in the study design and data collection, contributed to the statistical analyses, and helped draft the manuscript; A.J.H. conceived of the study, coordinated study design and data collection, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by a Small Grant for Early Career Scholars from the Society of Research on Child Development awarded to H.L.S. and A.J.H., and a Wayne State University Research Grant awarded to H.L.S.
Data Sharing Declaration
The dataset generated and/or analyzed during the current study is not publicly available but is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The study and all procedures were approved by the Wayne State University Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent
Informed assent was obtained from all youth participants included in the study. A waiver of parental consent was obtained from the IRB for this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Schacter, H.L., Ehrhardt, A.D. & Hoffman, A.J. Daily Fluctuations in Adolescents’ Perceived Friend Dominance and Friendship Clout: Associations with Mood and the Moderating Role of Anxiety. J. Youth Adolescence 53, 537–549 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01906-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01906-3