Abstract
Bullying victimization is a prevalent problem in upper elementary school that predicts various detrimental outcomes. Increasing evidence suggests that interindividual differences in the severity of these outcomes result from differences in victimization experiences. However, longitudinal research largely overlooked victimization forms. Additionally, it is unclear how the quality of students’ relationships with peers and teachers functions as a risk or protective factor for different patterns of victimization development. This one-year longitudinal study investigated joint trajectories of relational and physical victimization and examined differences between these trajectory classes regarding classroom social relationships as possible antecedents and social-emotional well-being as a possible outcome. A sample of 930 fourth to sixth graders (55 classes, 53.1% girls, Mage = 10.55, SD = 0.90) completed self-reports about relational and physical victimization and social-emotional outcomes (i.e., depressive symptoms, self-esteem). Peer nominations were used to measure the social antecedents (i.e., peer rejection and acceptance, teacher-student closeness and conflict). A 3-step approach including Latent Class Growth Analyses and Growth Mixture Modeling yielded two trajectory classes. Most students experienced low, decreasing relational and physical victimization. A smaller group experienced higher, generally stable victimization, more relational than physical. Younger students and girls were more likely to be members of the latter class. This class was more rejected, less accepted, reported more depressive symptoms and lower self-esteem. Teacher-student closeness and conflict were similar across classes. The current study showed that relational and physical victimization followed a largely parallel development. Low social status was found to be a risk factor for belonging to a victimization trajectory that is characterized by stable levels of both relational and physical victimization, with higher levels of the relational form.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arseneault, L. (2018). Annual research review: The persistent and pervasive impact of being bullied in childhood and adolescence: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(4), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12841.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Multiple imputation with Mplus. Mplus web notes, 238-246. https://www.statmodel.com/download/Imputations7.pdf.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2021). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus web notes, 21(11), 1–80.
Bakk, Z., Oberski, D. L., & Vermunt, J. K. (2014). Relating latent class assignments to external variables: Standard errors for correct inference. Political Analysis, 22(4), 520–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu003.
Bauman, S., & Del Rio, A. (2006). Preservice teachers’ responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.219.
Beran, T., & Stewart, S. (2008). Teachers’ and students’ reports of physical and indirect bullying. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 54(2), 242–244.
Berkowitz, R., De Pedro, K. T., & Gilreath, T. D. (2015). A latent class analysis of victimization among middle and high school students in California. Journal of School Violence, 14(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.980424.
Berlin, K. S., Parra, G. R., & Williams, N. A. (2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (Part 2): Longitudinal latent class growth analysis and growth mixture models. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst085.
Berlin, K. S., Williams, N. A., & Parra, G. R. (2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (Part 1): Overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst084.
Biggs, B. K., Vernberg, E., Little, T. D., Dill, E. J., Fonagy, P., & Twemlow, S. W. (2010). Peer victimization trajectories and their association with children’s affect in late elementary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025409348560.
Boivin, M., Petitclerc, A., Feng, B., & Barker, E. D. (2010). The developmental trajectories of peer victimization in middle to late childhood and the changing nature of their behavioral correlates. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0050.
Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bradshaw, C. P., Waasdorp, T. E., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2013). A latent class approach to examining forms of peer victimization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 839–849. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032091.
Casper, D. M. (2021). Types of traditional (offline) bullying. In P. K. Smith & J. O’Higgins Norman (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying: A Comprehensive and International Review of Research and Intervention (Vol. 1, pp. 96-119). Wiley-Blackwell.
Casper, D. M., & Card, N. A. (2017). Overt and relational victimization: A meta-analytic review of their overlap and associations with social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 88(2), 466–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12621.
Chorpita, B. F., Yim, L., Moffitt, C., Umemoto, L. A., & Francis, S. E. (2000). Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: A revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(8), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00130-8.
Christina, S., Magson, N. R., Kakar, V., & Rapee, R. M. (2021). The bidirectional relationships between peer victimization and internalizing problems in school-aged children: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101979.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (2018). Sociometric perspectives. In Bukowski, W. M., Laursen, B., & Rubin, K. H. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2 ed., pp. 64-83). The Guilford Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1998). Children’s treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression. In Hertzig, M. E., & Farber, E. A. (Eds.), Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development 1997 (pp. 79-92). Brunner/Mazel.
de Bruyn, E. H., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Wissink, I. B. (2010). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(4), 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609340517.
Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82.
Demaray, M. K., Malecki, C. K., Secord, S. M., & Lyell, K. M. (2013). Agreement among students’, teachers’, and parents’ perceptions of victimization by bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(12), 2091–2100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.018.
Demol, K., Leflot, G., Verschueren, K., & Colpin, H. (2020). Revealing the transactional associations among teacher-child relationships, peer rejection and peer victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2311–2326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01269-z.
Desjardins, T., Yeung Thompson, R. S., Sukhawathanakul, P., Leadbeater, B. J., & Macdonald, S. W. S. (2013). Factor structure of the Social Experience Questionnaire across time, sex, and grade among early elementary school children. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033006.
Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., Buyse, E., De Munter, S., Max, K., & Moens, L. (2009). Further examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the student–teacher relationship scale. Infant and Child Development, 18(6), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.635.
Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Strycker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis Inc.
Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2010). Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. Journal of School Psychology, 48(6), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.07.001.
Elledge, L. C., Elledge, A. R., Newgent, R. A., & Cavell, T. A. (2016). Social risk and peer victimization in elementary school children: The protective role of teacher-student relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(4), 691–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0074-z.
Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
Farmer, T. W., Lines, M. M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children’s peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.006.
Farmer, T. W., Talbott, B., Dawes, M., Huber, H. B., Brooks, D. S., & Powers, E. E. (2018). Social dynamics management: What is it and why is it important for intervention? Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617752139.
Frankfurt, S., Frazier, P., Syed, M., & Jung, K. R. (2016). Using group-based trajectory and growth mixture modeling to identify classes of change trajectories. The Counseling psychologist, 44(5), 622–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000016658097.
Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of school-bullying intervention programs globally: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-0007-4.
Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2021). What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.002.
Gage, N. A., Prykanowski, D. A., & Larson, A. (2014). School climate and bullying victimization: A latent class growth model analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(3), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000064.
Geoffroy, M., Boivin, M., Arseneault, L., Renaud, J., Perret, L. C., Turecki, G., Michel, G., Salla, J., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Tremblay, R. E., & Côté, S. M. (2018). Childhood trajectories of peer victimization and prediction of mental health outcomes in midadolescence: a longitudinal population-based study. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 190(2), E37–E43. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170219.
Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.004.
Graham, J. W., Taylor, B. J., Olchowski, A. E., & Cumsille, P. E. (2006). Planned missing data designs in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 11(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.323.
Greene, V. A. (2021). The role of teachers. In Smith, P. K., & O’Higgins Norman, J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying: A Comprehensive and International Review of Research and Intervention (Vol. 1, pp. 333-350). Wiley-Blackwell.
Hawley, P. H. (2015). Social dominance in childhood and its evolutionary underpinnings: Why it matters and what we can do. Pediatrics, 135(Supplement 2), S31–S38. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3549D.
Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But… Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629.
Herle, M., Micali, N., Abdulkadir, M., Loos, R., Bryant-Waugh, R., Hübel, C., Bulik, C. M., & De Stavola, B. L. (2020). Identifying typical trajectories in longitudinal data: modelling strategies and interpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 35(3), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00615-6.
Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.677.
Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038928.
Inchley, J., Currie, D., Budisavljevic, S., Torsheim, T., Jastad, A., Cosma, A., Kelly, C., & Arnarsson, A. M. (2020). Spotlight on adolescent health and well-being. Findings from the 2017/2018 Health Behavior in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey in Europe and Canada. International report. Volume 1. Key findings. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332091/9789289055000-eng.pdf.
Jeličić, H., Phelps, E., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Why missing data matter in the longitudinal study of adolescent development: Using the 4-H study to understand the uses of different missing data methods. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(7), 816–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9542-5.
Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x.
Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2000). Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.349.
Kaufman, T. M. L., Kretschmer, T., Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2018). Why does a universal anti-bullying program not help all children? Explaining persistent victimization during an intervention. Prevention Science, 19(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0906-5.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Little, T. D., & Rhemtulla, M. (2013). Planned missing data designs for developmental researchers. Child Development Perspectives, 7(4), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12043.
Longobardi, C., Ferrigno, S., Gullotta, G., Jungert, T., Thornberg, R., & Marengo, D. (2021). The links between students’ relationships with teachers, likeability among peers, and bullying victimization: the intervening role of teacher responsiveness. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00535-3
Marengo, D., Jungert, T., Iotti, N. O., Settanni, M., Thornberg, R., & Longobardi, C. (2018). Conflictual student-teacher relationship, emotional and behavioral problems, prosocial behavior, and their associations with bullies, victims, and bullies/victims. Educational Psychology, 38(9), 1201–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1481199.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User’s Guide. (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & and Medicine. (2016). Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23482.
Nguena Nguefack, H. L., Pagé, M. G., Katz, J., Choinière, M., Vanasse, A., Dorais, M., Samb, O. M., & Lacasse, A. (2020). Trajectory modelling techniques useful to epidemiological research: A comparative narrative review of approaches. Clinical epidemiology, 12, 1205–1222. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S265287.
Nylund, K., Bellmore, A., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2007). Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization: What does latent class analysis say? Child Development, 78(6), 1706–1722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01097.x.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Pouwels, J. L., & Garandeau, C. F. (2021). The role of the peer group and classroom factors in bullying behavior. In Smith, P. K., & O’Higgins Norman, J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of bullying: A comprehensive and international review of research and intervention (Vol. 1, pp. 450-). Wiley-Blackwell.
Prinstein, M. J., & Giletta, M. (2016). Peer relations and developmental psychopathology. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (pp. 527–579). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy112.
Putallaz, M., Grimes, C. L., Foster, K. J., Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dearing, K. (2007). Overt and relational aggression and victimization: Multiple perspectives within the school setting. Journal of School Psychology, 45(5), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.05.003.
Ram, N., & Grimm, K. J. (2009). Methods and measures: Growth mixture modeling: A method for identifying differences in longitudinal change among unobserved groups. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(6), 565–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025409343765.
Raskauskas, J. L., Gregory, J., Harvey, S. T., Rifshana, F., & Evans, I. M. (2010). Bullying among primary school children in New Zealand: Relationships with prosocial behaviour and classroom climate. Educational Research, 52(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881003588097.
Reavis, R. D., Keane, S. P., & Calkins, S. D. (2010). Trajectories of peer victimization: The role of multiple relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 303–332. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0055.
Rhemtulla, M., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). Planned missing data designs in educational psychology research. Educational Psychologist, 51(3-4), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1208094.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007.
Schoeler, T., Duncan, L., Cecil, C. M., Ploubidis, G. B., & Pingault, J.-B. (2018). Quasi-experimental evidence on short- and long-term consequences of bullying victimization: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(12), 1229–1246. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000171.
Sentse, M., Kretschmer, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The longitudinal interplay between bullying, victimization, and social status: Age‐related and gender differences. Social Development, 24(3), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12115.
Serdiouk, M., Berry, D., & Gest, S. D. (2016). Teacher-child relationships and friendships and peer victimization across the school year. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 46, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.08.001.
Sheppard, C. S., Giletta, M., & Prinstein, M. J. (2019). Peer victimization trajectories at the adolescent transition: Associations among chronic victimization, peer-reported status, and adjustment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 48(2), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1261713.
Stassen Berger, K. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27(1), 90–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.08.002.
Ten Bokkel, I. M., Verschueren, K., Demol, K., van Gils, F. E., & Colpin, H. (2021). Reciprocal links between teacher-student relationships and peer victimization: A three-wave longitudinal study in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01490-4.
Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. In Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. New directions for child and adolescent dvelopment (Vol. 88, pp. 27-53). Jossey-Bass.
Thomas, H. J. (2021). Ecological and psychological perspectives of bullying. In Smith, P. K., & O’Higgins Norman, J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of bullying: A comprehensive and international review of research and intervention (Vol. 2, pp. 727-744). Wiley-Blackwell.
Troop-Gordon, W., & Kopp, J. (2011). Teacher-child relationship quality and children’s peer victimization and aggressive behavior in late childhood. Social Development, 20(3), 536–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00604.x.
Tsaousis, I. (2016). The relationship of self-esteem to bullying perpetration and peer victimization among schoolchildren and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.09.005.
van de Schoot, R., Sijbrandij, M., Winter, S. D., Depaoli, S., & Vermunt, J. K. (2017). The GRoLTS-Checklist: Guidelines for reporting on latent trajectory studies. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(3), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1247646.
van der Ploeg, R., Steglich, C., Salmivalli, C., & Veenstra, R. (2015). The intensity of victimization: Associations with children’s psychosocial well-being and social standing in the classroom. PLoS One, 10(10), e0141490 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141490.
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81(2), 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01411.x.
Velásquez, A. M., Bukowski, W. M., & Saldarriaga, L. M. (2013). Adjusting for group size effects in peer nomination data: Adjusting for group size effects. Social Development, 22(4), 845–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12029.
Verschueren, K., & Koomen, H. Y. (2012). Teacher–child relationships from an attachment perspective. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672260.
Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Laursen, B. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 531-547). The Guilford Press.
Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345.
Yoon, J. S., Sulkowski, M. L., & Bauman, S. A. (2016). Teachers’ responses to bullying incidents: Effects of teacher characteristics and contexts. Journal of School Violence, 15(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.963592.
Zhou, Y. Y., Zheng, H., Liang, Y. M., Wang, J. Z., Han, R., & Liu, Z. K. (2020). Joint developmental trajectories of bullying and victimization from childhood to adolescence: A parallel-process latent class growth analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520933054.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the participants of the study, and the job students and master students of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences who assisted in the data collection.
Authors' contributions
K.D. conceived the study, coordinated the data collection, constructed the hypotheses, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the results, and drafted the manuscript; K.V. conceived the study, constructed the hypotheses, interpreted the results, and helped to draft the manuscript; I.M.t.B. coordinated the data collection and gave feedback on the manuscript; F.E.v.G. coordinated the data collection and gave feedback on the manuscript; H.C. conceived the study, constructed the hypotheses, interpreted the results, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by Research Foundation Flanders (Grant G071317N) and KU Leuven (Grant C24/17/026).
Data Sharing Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical Approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted by the Social and Societal Ethics Committee (SMEC) of KU Leuven.
Informed Consent
Active parental informed consent was obtained for all participants prior to data collection.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demol, K., Verschueren, K., ten Bokkel, I.M. et al. Trajectory Classes of Relational and Physical Bullying Victimization: Links with Peer and Teacher-Student Relationships and Social-Emotional Outcomes. J Youth Adolescence 51, 1354–1373 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01544-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01544-7