Skip to main content
Log in

Why is Self-Esteem Higher Among American than Chinese Early Adolescents? The Role of Psychologically Controlling Parenting

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about why American youth tend to have higher self-esteem than do Chinese youth. This research examined the role of psychologically controlling parenting during early adolescence. 825 youth (48% females; Mage = 12.73 years) in the United States and China reported on their self-esteem and parents’ psychological control every 6 months from the fall of 7th grade to spring of 8th grade. Both American and Chinese youth’s self-esteem decreased over time, but American youth consistently had higher self-esteem. American parents were less psychologically controlling than were Chinese parents who, unlike American parents, became more psychologically controlling over time. These differences in psychologically controlling parenting contributed to the tendency for American youth to have higher self-esteem than their Chinese counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

Data collection for this research was funded by National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH57505). Data analysis and manuscript preparation were supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan (MOST107-2917-I-003-005).

Data Sharing and Declaration

The dataset analyzed for the current report is not publicly available but may be requested from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.Y.C. was involved in hypothesis development, performed the data analyses, and drafted the manuscript; J.N. was involved in hypothesis development, data analysis, and manuscript preparation; E.M.P. designed and supervised the project, and was involved in hypothesis development and the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hung-Yang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

The research was conducted in line with American Psychological Association ethical standards in the treatment of the participating youth. The research was approved by Institutional Review Boards in both the United States and China.

Informed Consent

Parents provided consent for youth to participate prior to the administration of the surveys; youth provided informed assent at each wave of data collection.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A Fit indices of measurement invariance analyses for the self-esteem and psychological control scale across countries and over time

 

Self-esteem

Psychological control

 

RMSEA

CFI

TLI

χ2

RMSEA

CFI

TLI

χ2

Between-Country Invariance

 Configural

0.05

0.98

0.98

533.74

0.04

0.98

0.98

680.20

 Metric

0.05

0.98

0.97

598.65

0.04

0.98

0.98

742.30

 Scalar

0.07

0.96

0.96

885.58

0.05

0.97

0.97

891.95

 Partial Scalar

0.06

0.97

0.97

723.52

Longitudinal Invariance

 US

 Configural

0.06

0.98

0.97

302.10

0.03

0.99

0.99

291.05

 Metric

0.06

0.98

0.97

333.06

0.03

0.99

0.99

320.44

 Scalar

0.06

0.98

0.97

351.06

0.04

0.98

0.98

405.23

 China

 Configural

0.04

0.99

0.98

231.64

0.04

0.98

0.97

389.16

 Metric

0.04

0.98

0.98

266.17

0.04

0.98

0.97

407.88

 Scalar

0.05

0.98

0.97

319.95

0.05

0.97

0.97

451.53

  1. Note. RMSEA Root-Mean Square Error of Approximation, CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index

Appendix B Fit Indices of measurement invariance analyses for the positive and negative dimensions of self-esteem scale across countries and over time

 

Positive Self-Esteem

Negative Self-Esteem

 

RMSEA

CFI

TLI

χ2

RMSEA

CFI

TLI

χ2

Between-Country Invariance

 Configural

0.05

0.93

0.91

2861.33

0.05

0.93

0.92

2653.13

 Metric

0.05

0.92

0.91

2961.33

0.05

0.93

0.92

2722.34

 Scalar

0.06

0.90

0.89

3430.17

0.06

0.89

0.88

3554.16

 Partial Scalar

0.06

0.92

0.91

3120.36

0.05

0.92

0.91

2876.55

Longitudinal Invariance

 US

 Configural

0.05

0.94

0.93

1374.47

0.06

0.91

0.90

1592.27

 Metric

0.05

0.94

0.93

1407.30

0.06

0.91

0.90

1643.08

 Scalar

0.05

0.93

0.93

1463.01

0.06

0.91

0.90

1689.71

 China

 Configural

0.05

0.91

0.90

1486.86

0.04

0.95

0.95

1060.86

 Metric

0.05

0.91

0.90

1510.74

0.04

0.95

0.95

1106.84

 Scalar

0.05

0.90

0.90

1633.83

0.04

0.95

0.94

1155.68

 Partial Scalar

0.05

0.91

0.90

1604.74

  1. Note. RMSEA Root-Mean Square Error of Approximation, CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, HY., Ng, J. & Pomerantz, E.M. Why is Self-Esteem Higher Among American than Chinese Early Adolescents? The Role of Psychologically Controlling Parenting. J Youth Adolescence 50, 1856–1869 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01474-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01474-4

Keywords

Navigation