Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intersections of Racial Discrimination and LGB Victimization for Mental Health: A Prospective Study of Sexual Minority Youth of Color

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual minority youth (i.e., lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth; LGB) of color have multiple minoritized identities, and few studies examine the implications of intersectional minority stressors for their prospective mental health. The current study tested three intersectional hypotheses: the additive hypothesis—racial discrimination and LGB victimization are independently associated with mental health; the multiplicative hypothesis—racial discrimination and LGB victimization interact in to exacerbate their negative association with mental health, and the inuring hypothesis—only racial discrimination or LGB victimization is associated with mental health. Data come from a sample of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth of color (36% Black, 30% Latino, 26% Multi-racial, 4% Native American, and 3% Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander) from two U.S. cities, one in the Northeast (77%) and one in the Southwest, who were between ages 15–24 (M = 19) and surveyed four times over three years spaced nine months apart (N = 476; 38% bisexual; 67% free and reduced lunch; and 49% assigned female at birth). The multiplicative hypothesis was supported for depression symptoms, and the additive hypothesis was supported for suicidal ideation. Intersectional minority stressors undermine the mental health of sexual minority youth of color and warrant further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The two acronyms LGB and SMY are used intentionally, because they reflect who is being references in cited studies.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grant, P2CHD042849, Population Research Center, and by grant, T32HD007081, Training Program in Population Studies, both awarded to the Population Research Center at The University of Texas at Austin by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. This research uses data from the Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide among Sexual Minority Youth study, designed by Arnold H. Grossman and Stephen T. Russell, and supported by Award Number R01MH091212 from the National Institute of Mental Health. This research was also supported in part by the National Institute of Mental Health through a grant awarded to Allen B. Mallory grant number F31MH115608. The authors acknowledge generous support for Russell from the Priscilla Pond Flawn Endowment at the University of Texas at Austin.: This manuscript’s data will not be deposited. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Data Sharing and Declaration

This manuscript’s data will not be deposited. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.M. conceived of the study, performed the statistical analyses, participated in the interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript; SR designed and conducted the original data collection of the larger study, participated in the interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Allen B. Mallory or Stephen T. Russell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

The questionnaire and methodology for this study were approved by the University of Texas at Austin Institutional Review Board, 2015-06-0050; Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide Among Sexual Minority Youth (a.k.a. The SOGI-Q Health Study).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

The questionnaire and methodology for this study were approved by the University of Texas at Austin Institutional Review Board, 2015-06-0050; Risk and Protective Factors for Suicide Among Sexual Minority Youth (a.k.a. The SOGI-Q Health Study).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A. Attrition analysis for Wave 2

 

Not Completed

Completed

 

n

Mean (SD)

n

Mean (SD)

t(df)

p-value

W1 Depressive Symptoms (N = 475)

166

0.81 (0.69)

309

0.68 (0.58)

1.94 (290.05)

0.05

W1 Negative Ideation (N = 473)

166

0.63 (0.84)

307

0.39 (0.73)

3.10 (300.21)**

0.002

W1 Racial Discrimination (N = 476)

166

0.81 (0.81)

310

1.03 (0.94)

−2.61 (382.44)**

0.01

W1 LGB Victimization (N = 476)

166

0.75 (0.87)

310

0.63 (0.70)

1.50 (278.82)

0.14

W1Age (N = 476)

166

18.82 (1.87)

310

19.07 (1.74)

−1.42 (317.42)

0.15

 

Not Completed

Completed

 

n

%

n

%

X2(df)

p-value

Northeast Site (n = 368)

132

79.5

236

76.1

0.71 (1)

0.40

Black (n = 173)

61

36.8

110

35.5

0.08 (1)

0.78

Native American (n = 19)

6

3.6

13

4.2

0.10 (1)

0.76

Multiracial (n = 125)

43

25.9

82

26.5

0.02 (1)

0.89

Latino (n = 137)

47

29.0

90

29.4

0.01 (1)

0.93

AHPI (n = 16)

5

3.0

11

3.5

0.10 (1)

0.76

Cisgender female (n = 231)

76

45.8

155

50.0

0.77 (1)

0.38

Gay/Lesbian (n = 276)

90

54.2

186

60.0

1.48 (1)

0.22

Bisexual (n = 181)

67

40.4

114

36.8

0.59 (1)

0.44

Queer (n = 19)

9

5.4

10

3.2

1.36 (1)

0.24

Free and reduced lunch (n = 316)

119

73.0

198

64.3

3.53 (1)

0.06

  1. T-tests were calculated for unequal variance between groups. Reference group of Northeast site was the Southwest site
  2. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Appendix B. Attrition Analysis for Wave 3

 

Not Completed

Completed

  
 

n

Mean (SD)

n

Mean (SD)

t (df)

p-value

W1 Depressive Symptoms (N = 475)

221

0.78 (0.68)

254

0.68 (0.57)

1.78 (433.29)

0.08

W1 Negative Ideation (N = 473)

220

0.57 (0.80)

253

0.39 (0.75)

2.50 (453.36) *

0.01

W1 Racial Discrimination (N = 476)

222

0.91 (0.86)

254

1.00 (0.95)

−1.10 (473.33)

0.27

W1 LGB Victimization (N = 476)

222

0.75 (0.83)

254

0.61 (0.69)

1.91 (430.32)

0.06

W1Age (N = 476)

222

18.90 (1.80)

254

19.06 (1.79)

−0.95 (464.89)

0.34

 

Not Completed

Completed

 

n

%

n

%

X2(df)

p-value

Northeast Site (n = 368)

179

80.6

189

74.4

2.61 (1)

0.11

Black (n = 173)

89

40.1

82

32.3

3.14 (1)

0.08

Native American (n = 19)

11

4.0

8

3.2

1.01 (1)

0.32

Multiracial (n = 125)

53

23.9

72

28.4

1.22 (1)

0.27

Latino (n = 137)

59

27.2

78

31.1

0.85 (1)

0.36

AHPI (n = 16)

5

2.3

11

4.3

1.58 (1)

0.21

Cisgender female (n = 231)

103

46.4

128

50.4

0.76 (1)

0.38

Gay/Lesbian (n = 276)

110

49.6

166

65.4

12.15 (1)***

<0.001

Bisexual (n = 181)

99

44.6

82

32.3

7.62 (1)**

0.01

Queer (n = 19)

13

5.7

6

2.4

3.77 (1)

0.05

Free and reduced lunch (n = 316)

161

73.9

155

61.5

8.09 (1)**

0.004

  1. T-tests were calculated for unequal variance between groups. Reference group of Northeast site was the Southwest site
  2. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Appendix C. Attrition Analysis for Wave 4

 

Not Completed

Completed

  
 

n

Mean (SD)

n

Mean (SD)

t(df)

p-value

W1 Depressive Symptoms (N = 475)

240

0.75 (0.64)

235

0.70 (0.61)

0.73 (472.75)

0.47

W1 Negative Ideation (N = 473)

239

0.52 (0.75)

234

0.43 (0.81)

1.10 (467.03)

0.27

W1 Racial Discrimination (N = 476)

241

0.95 (0.89)

235

0.96 (0.92)

−0.14 (472.01)

0.89

W1 LGB Victimization (N = 476)

241

0.71 (0.81)

235

0.63 (0.71)

1.13 (468.02)

0.26

W1Age (N = 476)

241

18.86 (1.84)

235

19.12 (1.74)

−1.60 (473.67)

0.11

 

Not Completed

Completed

 

n

%

n

%

X2(df)

p-value

Northeast Site (n = 368)

194

80.5

174

74.0

2.83 (1)

0.09

Black (n = 171)

90

37.3

81

34.5

0.43 (1)

0.51

Native American (n = 19)

14

5.8

5

2.1

4.21 (1)*

0.04

Multiracial (n = 125)

56

23.2

69

29.4

2.31 (1)

0.13

Latino (n = 137)

69

29.2

68

29.3

0.003 (1)

0.99

AHPI (n = 16)

7

2.9

9

3.8

0.31 (1)

0.58

Cisgender female (n = 231)

112

46.5

119

50.6

0.83 (1)

0.36

Gay/Lesbian (n = 276)

127

52.7

149

63.4

5.60 (1)*

0.02

Bisexual (n = 181)

101

41.9

80

34.0

3.12 (1)

0.08

Queer (n = 19)

13

5.4

6

2.6

2.51 (1)

0.11

Free and reduced lunch (n = 316)

178

75.1

138

59.2

13.45 (1)***

<0.001

  1. T-tests were calculated for unequal variance between groups
  2. Reference group of Northeast site was the Southwest site
  3. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Appendix D. Model fit for sensitivity analyses

Title

X 2

df

p-value

Scaling Correction

RMSEA

90%CI LL

90%CI UL

SRMR

CFI

Depression Symptoms w Lagged W1 Racial Discrimination and LGB Victimization

35.105

25

0.09

1.01

0.03

0.00

0.05

0.02

0.98

Depression Symptoms w Lagged W1 Racial Discrimination, LGB Victimization, and Interaction

34.258

25

0.10

1.00

0.03

0.00

0.05

0.02

0.98

Suicidal Ideation w Lagged W1 Racial Discrimination and LGB Victimization

42.351

26

0.02

1.18

0.04

0.01

0.06

0.03

0.93

Suicidal Ideation w Lagged W1 Racial Discrimination, LGB Victimization, and Interaction

80.743

28

0.00

1.40

0.06

0.05

0.08

0.05

0.77

  1. RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, CFI Comparative Fit Index, SRMR Standardized Root MeanResidual

Appendix E. Sensitivity analysis—alternative model

 

Depression

Suicidal Ideation

 

Main Effects

Interactions

Main Effects

Interactionsa

Variables

β

SE

β

SE

β

SE

b

SE

W1 Racial Discrimination → W1 Outcome

0.22***

0.05

0.22***

0.05

0.14**

0.05

W1 LGB Victimization → W1 Outcome

0.20***

0.05

0.18***

0.05

0.20***

0.05

W1 Racial Discrimination → W2 Outcome

0.19***

0.06

0.19***

0.05

0.09

0.05

W1 LGB Victimization → W2 Outcome

0.12*

0.06

0.11

0.06

0.22***

0.07

W1 Racial Discrimination → W3 Outcome

0.12*

0.05

0.11*

0.05

0.09

0.07

W1 LGB Victimization → W3 Outcome

0.01

0.06

0.03

0.06

−0.03

0.06

W1 Racial Discrimination → W4 Outcome

0.10

0.07

0.09

0.07

0.02

0.07

W1 LGB Victimization → W4 Outcome

0.11

0.09

0.11

0.09

0.28***

0.10

W1 Discrimination X Victimization → W1 Outcome

0.09

0.05

W1 Discrimination X Victimization → W2 Outcome

0.05

0.06

W1 Discrimination X Victimization → W3 Outcome

−0.05

0.05

W1 Discrimination X Victimization → W4 Outcome

0.00

0.08

  1. aNot shown due to poor model fit. Coefficients arestandardized
  2. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mallory, A.B., Russell, S.T. Intersections of Racial Discrimination and LGB Victimization for Mental Health: A Prospective Study of Sexual Minority Youth of Color. J Youth Adolescence 50, 1353–1368 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01443-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01443-x

Keywords

Navigation