Skip to main content
Log in

Teen Dating Relationships: How Daily Disagreements are Associated with Relationship Satisfaction

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Being in a satisfying romantic relationship in adolescence is associated to many short- and long-term benefits. However, more research is needed to better understand what promotes relationship satisfaction in adolescence. To address this gap, this study used a diary approach to examine the relation between disagreements and daily variations in adolescent romantic relationship satisfaction. A sample of 186 adolescents was recruited (Mage = 17.08 years, SD = 1.48; 56% female). Multilevel modeling was used to evaluate how disagreement occurrences, resolution, and resolution strategies were related to daily perceived relationship satisfaction at both the between- and within-subjects levels. At the within-subjects level, satisfaction was lower on days when a disagreement occurred, especially for girls. Adolescents also reported lower relationship satisfaction on days when they used more destructive strategies than usual, and higher relationship satisfaction on days when they successfully resolved disagreements. This study demonstrates that adolescents’ evaluations of their daily relationship satisfaction vary as function of disagreement processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Arriaga, X. B. (2001). The ups and downs of dating: fluctuations in satisfaction in newly formed romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B., & Eccles, J. (2003). The joy of romance: Healthy adolescent relationships as an educational agenda. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 355–370). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Psychology Press.

  • Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences. In Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  • Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 23–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Collibee, C., & Furman, W. (2015). Quality counts: developmental shifts in associations between romantic relationship qualities and psychosocial adjustment. Child Development, 86(5), 1639–1652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & McIsaac, C. (2009). Adolescents’ explanations for romantic dissolutions: a developmental perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 32(5), 1209–1223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., Baird, K., Bravo, V., Lovald, B., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (2015). Adolescents’ use of affiliative and aggressive strategies during conflict with romantic partners and best-friends. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(5), 549–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. N., Totenhagen, C. J., McDaniel, B. T., & Curran, M. A. (2018). Volatility in daily relationship quality: the roles of attachment and gender. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(3), 348–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir, M., & Urberg, K. A. (2004). Friendship and adjustment among adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88(1), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, J. A., & Karantzas, G. C. (2017). Couple conflict: insights from an attachment perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., Rogge, R., & Beach, S. R. H. (2018). Relationship satisfaction. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 422–436). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

  • Flook, L. (2011). Gender differences in adolescents’ daily interpersonal events and well‐being. Child Development, 82(2), 454–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora, J., & Segrin, C. (2015). Family conflict and communication. In The SAGE handbook of family communication (pp. 91–106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Fortin, A., Paradis, A., Lapierre, A., & Hébert, M. (2020). Validation of the French-Canadian adaptation of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory for adolescents in dating relationships. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 52(4), 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W. (2018). The romantic relationships of youth. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 410–428). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

  • Furman, W., & Shaffer, L. (2003). The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 3–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Furman, W., & Shomaker, L. B. (2008). Patterns of interaction in adolescent romantic relationships: distinct features and links to other close relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 31(6), 771–788.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Galliher, R. V., Welsh, D. P., Rostosky, S. S., & Kawaguchi, M. C. (2004). Interaction and relationship quality in late adolescent romantic couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. M., Diebels, K. J., & Barnow, Z. B. (2011). The reliability of relationship satisfaction: a reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(1), 39–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, T., Overbeek, G., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., & Engels, R. C. (2013). Do conflict resolution and recovery predict the survival of adolescents’ romantic relationships?. PloS ONE, 8(4).

  • Joyner, K., & Udry, J. (2000). You don’t bring me anything but down: adolescent romance and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(4), 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. (1983). Close relationships. New York, NY: Freeman.

  • Kelley, H. (2002). Close relationships (Foundations of psychology). Clinton Corners, NY: Percheron Press.

  • Kendler, K. S., Thornton, L. M., & Prescott, C. A. (2001). Gender differences in the rates of exposure to stressful life events and sensitivity to their depressogenic effects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(4), 587–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (1994). Conflict resolution styles in gay, lesbian, heterosexual nonparent, and heterosexual parent couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(3), 705–722.

  • Laurenceau, J.-P., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(1), 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, B., & Adams, R. (2018). Conflict between peers. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 265–283). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

  • Laursen, B., & Hafen, C. A. (2010). Future directions in the study of close relationships: conflict is bad (except when it’s not). Social Development, 19(4), 858–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, B., Finkelstein, B. D., & Betts, N. T. (2001). A developmental meta-analysis of peer conflict resolution. Developmental Review, 21(4), 423–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, G., Bar-Kalifa, E., & Rafaeli, E. (2018). Accurate where it counts: empathic accuracy on conflict and no-conflict days. Emotion, 18(2), 212–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le, B., Dove, N. L., Agnew, C. R., Korn, M. S., & Mutso, A. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: a meta‐analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17(3), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, S. D., & Collins, W. A. (2011). The salience of adolescent romantic experiences for romantic relationship qualities in young adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(4), 789–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • McNeish, D., & Hamaker, E. L. (2019). A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in mplus. Psychological Methods, 2019.

  • Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Neto, F., & da Conceição Pinto, M. (2015). Satisfaction with love life across the adult life span. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 10(2), 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orpinas, P., Hsieh, H.-L., Song, X., Holland, K., & Nahapetyan, L. (2013). Trajectories of physical dating violence from middle to high school: association with relationship quality and acceptability of aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(4), 551–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, A. & Fernet, M. (2017). Méthodes de recherche en psychologie du couple. In Y. Lussier, S. Sabourin, et C. Bélanger (Eds), Les fondements de la psychologie du couple (pp. 649–687). Québec, Canada: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

  • Sabourin, S., Valois, P., & Lussier, Y. (2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2003). Testing theories of romantic development from adolescence to young adulthood: evidence of a developmental sequence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(6), 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S. (2003). Conflict and negotiation in adolescent romantic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 109–135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Shulman, S., Tuval-Mashiach, R., Levran, E., & Anbar, S. (2006). Conflict resolution patterns and longevity of adolescent romantic couples: a 2-year follow-up study. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 575–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, M. D., Branje, S. J., Hox, J. J., & Meeus, W. H. (2009). Intraindividual variability in adolescents’ perceived relationship satisfaction: the role of daily conflict. Journal of yOuth and Adolescence, 38(6), 790–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannucci, A., Ohannessian, C. M., Flannery, K. M., De Los Reyes, A., & Liu, S. (2018). Associations between friend conflict and affective states in the daily lives of adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 65, 155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viejo, C., Gómez-López M., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2018). Adolescents’ psychological well-being: a multidimensional measure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10).

Download references


This study was accomplished with funding by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC; 430-2018-00771) awarded to A.P.

Data Sharing and Declaration

This manuscript’s data will not be deposited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



E.H.T. contributed to the conception of the study and the design, participated in the data collection, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript; A.P. contributed to the conception and design of the study, supervised data collection, material preparation and data analysis, and helped draft the manuscript; N.G. participated in the data analysis and contributed to writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Paradis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study has been approved by the Université du Québec à Montréal’s institutional ethics committee for research with human subjects (Comité institutional d’éthique de la recherche avec des êtres humains); certificate # 1770_e_2018; file #592.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained through signed consent forms. Participants were solely identifiable by an assigned identification code.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Todorov, EH., Paradis, A. & Godbout, N. Teen Dating Relationships: How Daily Disagreements are Associated with Relationship Satisfaction. J Youth Adolescence 50, 1510–1520 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: