Skip to main content

Who Are Popular, Liked, and Admired? Longitudinal Associations between Three Social Status and Academic-Social Behavior

Abstract

Peer social status has been identified as central to youth’s development. Whereas the majority of studies has focused on popularity and likability, recent efforts emphasize the need to consider admiration which captures how much peers respect and want to be like particular youth. The current study examined the overlap between the three types of social status (popularity, likability, and admiration), and investigated concurrent and longitudinal associations between social status and academic-social behavior. At each of 2 waves (five months apart), 736 South Korean youth (Mage = 12.5; 53% girls) made behavioral and social status nominations of their peers in classes. Popularity, likability, and admiration were only weakly associated with each other, and each social status was characterized by distinct behavioral features. Specifically, admiration was most strongly associated with academic engagement and prosocial behavior. Cross-lagged models revealed a bidirectional relationship between academic engagement and admiration. Academic engagement led to gains in admiration and admiration led to increases in academic engagement. The findings emphasize the need to focus on admiration to support youth’s positive adjustment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. S. (2007). Peer-perceived admiration and social likability: contextual correlates of positive peer regard among suburban and urban adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(1), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00514.x.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bukowski, W. M., Sippola, L. K., & Newcomb, A. F. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction of same- and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bukowski, W. M., Gauze, C., Hoza, B., & Newcomb, A. F. (1993). Differences and consistency between same-sex and other-sex peer relationships during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, X., Fu, R., & Leng, L. (2014). Culture and developmental psycho-pathology. In M. Lewis & K. D. Rudolph (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (pp. 225–241). New York, NY: Springer U.S.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cillessen, A. H., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: a growth curve modelling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 935–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.05.005.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cillessen, A. H. N., & van den Berg, Y. (2012). Popularity and school adjustment. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 135–164). Charlotte, NC: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  10. de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(6), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558406293966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dijkstra, J. K., & Gest, S. D. (2015). Peer norm salience for academic achievement, prosocial behavior, and bullying: implications for adolescent school experiences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614524303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Graham, S., Taylor, A. Z., & Hudley, C. (1998). Exploring achievement values among ethnic minority early adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 606–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (1999). Children’s interpersonal perceptions as a function of sociometric and peer-perceived popularity. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160(2), 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, J. (2003). The core of Confucian learning. The American Psychologist, 58(2), 146–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.146.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Merten, D. E. (1996). Visibility and vulnerability: responses to rejection by nonaggressive junior high school boys. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course- persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.674.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. North, E. A., Ryan, A., Cortina, K., & Brass, N. R. (2019). Social status and classroom behavior in math and science during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(3), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0949-8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431698018002001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Acker, R. V. (2006). They’re cool: social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15(2), 175–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodkin, P. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in educational context. APA: educational psychology handbook: Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors, K. R. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan. (Editors in Chief), 363–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-015.

  25. Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378–387.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peers interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. Lerner (Series Eds.), & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 571–645). New York, NY: Wiley.

  27. Ryan, A. M., & Shin, H. (2018). Peers, academics and teachers. In W. B. Bukowski, B. Laursen & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups (pp. 637–646). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shin, H. (2017a). Friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression, pro-social behavior, and social status: the moderating role of gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2305–2320.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014a). Early adolescent friendships and academic adjustment: examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal social network analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2462–2472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037922.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor, A. Z., & Graham, S. (2007). An examination of the relationship between achievement values and perceptions of barriers among low-SES African American and Latino students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 52–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tseng, W. L., Banny, A. M., Kawabata, Y., Crick, N. R., & Gau, S. S. F. (2013). A cross-lagged structural equation model of relational aggression, physical aggression, and peer status in a Chinese culture. Aggressive Behavior, 39(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21480.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Véronneau, M. H., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Dishion, T. J., & Tremblay, R. E. (2010). Transactional analysis of the reciprocal links between peer experiences and academic achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019816.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wentzel, K. R. (2005). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, Z., Pomerantz, E. M., Qin, L., Logis, H., Ryan, A. M., & Wang, M. (2018). Characteristics of likability, perceived popularity, and admiration in the early adolescent peer system in the United States and China. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1568–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000544.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiyoung Shin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The research was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Oklahoma State University. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of Oklahoma State University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. Students signed an assent form indicating that they understood the conditions and wanted to participate prior to starting the survey.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, H. Who Are Popular, Liked, and Admired? Longitudinal Associations between Three Social Status and Academic-Social Behavior. J Youth Adolescence 49, 1783–1792 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01222-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Popularity
  • Likability
  • Admiration
  • Academic and social behavior