During adolescence, individuals make judgements on the legitimacy of authorities to make and enforce rules and they differentiate between various types of rules. This study tracked a socially and racially diverse sample (47% White) of 800 Brazilians for three years, ages 11–13 (50% female), allowing for variation between issues and individuals. The strongest predictors of compliance were adolescents’ beliefs that parents were legitimate authorities. Other significant predictors were authorities’ procedural justice and disciplinary practices. Legitimacy attributions partially mediated the relationship between procedural justice and compliance. Compliance and legitimacy varied across issues. Across time, parenting variables diminished in predictive strength while legitimacy attributions increased. Procedural justice practices may partially establish parental legitimacy, while disciplinary practices are less effective and perhaps counter-productive.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) and Center for the Study of Violence of the University of São Paulo (NEV-USP), but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. However, data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of NEV-USP.
Assadi, S. M., Smetana, J., Shahmansouri, N., & Mohammadi, M. (2011). Beliefs about parental authority, parenting styles, and parent-adolescent conflict among Iranian mothers of middle adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411409121.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Baumrind, D. (1991). Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition. In P. A. Cowan & E. M. Hetherington (Eds), Family transitions, vol. 2 (pp. 111–1163). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Cohn, E. S., Bucolo, D. O., Rebellon, C. J., & Van Gundy, K. (2010). An integrated model of legal and moral reasoning and rule-violating behavior: the role of legal attitudes. Law and Human Behavior, 34(4), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9185-9.
Cohn, E. S., Trinkner, R. J., Rebellon, C. J., Van Gundy, K. T., & Cole, L. M. (2012). Legal attitudes and legitimacy: extending the integrated legal socialization model. Victims & Offenders, 7(4), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2012.713902.
Cumsille, P., Flaherty, B. P., Darling, N., & Martínez, M. L. (2006). Chilean adolescents’ beliefs about the legitimacy of parental authority: individual and age-related differences. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406063554.
Cumsille, P., Darling, N., Flaherty, B., & Martínez, M. L. (2009). Heterogeneity and change in the patterning of adolescents’ perceptions of the legitimacy of parental authority: a latent transitions model. Child Development, 80(2), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01269.x.
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: an integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487.
Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Peña-Alampay, L. (2005). Rules, legitimacy of parental authority, and obligation to obey in Chile, the Philippines, and the United States. In J. Smetana (Ed.), Changing boundaries of parental authority during adolescence (pp. 47–60). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Martínez, M. L. (2007). Adolescents’ as active agents in the socialization process: legitimacy of parental authority and obligation to obey as predictors of obedience. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.03.003.
Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Martínez, M. L. (2008). Individual differences in adolescents’ beliefs about the legitimacy of parental authority and their own obligation to obey: a longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 79(4), 1103–1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01178.x.
Fagan, J., & Tyler, T. (2005). Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18(3), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-6823-3.
Feldman, S. S., & Rosenthal, D. A. (1991). Age expectations of behavioural autonomy in Hong Kong, Australian and American youth: the influence of family variables and adolescents’ values. International Journal of Psychology, 26(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599108246846.
Feldman, S. S., & Quatman, T. (1988). Factors influencing age expectations for adolescent autonomy: a study of early adolescents and parents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 8(4), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431688084002.
Fletcher, A. C., Walls, J. K., Cook, E. C., Madison, K. J., & Bridges, T. H. (2008). Parenting styles as a moderator of associations between maternal disciplinary strategies and child well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 29(12), 1724–1744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08322933.
Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 539–579. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.4.539.
Gershoff, E. T., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Lansford, J. E., Change, L., Zelli, A., Deater-Deckard, K., & Dodge, K. A. (2010). Parent discipline practices in an international sample: associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness. Child Development, 18(2), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01409.x.
Gingo, M., Roded, A. D., & Turiel, E. (2017). Authority, autonomy, and deception: evaluating the legitimacy of parental authority and adolescent deceit. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(4), 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12319.
Gomes, A. F. C., & Azevedo, A. V. S. (2014). Punição corporal e problemas comportamentais em adolescentes [Corporal punishment and behavioral problems in adolescents]. Contextos Clínicos, 7(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.4013/ctc.2014.71.07.
Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: a reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.11.
Koehn, A. J., & Kerns, K. A. (2018). Parent-child attachment: meta-analysis of associations with parenting behaviors in middle childhood and adolescence. Attachment and Human Development, 20(4), 378–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2017.1408131.
Kuczynski, L., & Hildebrandt, N. (1997). Models of conformity and resistance in socialization theory. In J. E. Grusec, & L. Kuczynski. (Eds), Parenting and the internalization of values: a handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 227–256). New York, NY: Wiley.
Kuhn, E. S., & Laird, R. D. (2011). Individual differences in early adolescents’ beliefs in the legitimacy of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1353–1365. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024050.
Kuhn, E. S., Phan, J. M., & Laird, R. D. (2014). Compliance with parents’ rules: between-person and within-person predictions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9965-x.
LaFleur, L. K., Zhao, Y., Zeringue, M. M., & Laird, R. D. (2016). Warmth and legitimacy beliefs contextualize adolescents’ negative reactions to parental monitoring. Journal of Adolescence, 51, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.05.013.
Locke, L. M., & Prinz, R. J. (2002). Measurement of parental discipline and nurturance. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 895–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(02)00133-2.
Martínez, I., García, J. F., & Yubero, S. (2007). Parenting styles and adolescents’ self-esteem in Brazil. Psychological Reports, 100(3), 731–745. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.100.3.731-745.
Martínez, M. L., Perez, C., & Cumsille, P. (2014). Chilean adolescents’ and parents’ views on autonomy development. Youth & Society, 46(2), 176–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X11434215.
McKee, L., Roland, E., Coffelt, N., Olson, A. L., Forehand, R., Massari, C., & Zens, M. S. (2007). Harsh discipline and child problem behaviors: the roles of positive parenting and gender. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9070-6.
Mellado, C., Cumsille, P., & Martínez, M. L. (2018). Interactive associations of parental support, demands, and psychological control, over adolescents’ beliefs about the legitimacy of parental authority. Journal of Adolescence, 64, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.02.001.
Milnitsky-Sapiro, C., Turiel, E., & Nucci, L. (2006). Brazilian adolescents’ conceptions of autonomy and parental authority. Cognitive Development, 21, 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.01.001.
Nucci, L. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nucci, L., Camino, C., & Sapiro, C. M. (1996). Social class effects on northeaster Brazilian children’s conceptions of areas of personal choice and social regulation. Child Development, 67(3), 1223–1242. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131889.
Patrick, R. B., & Gibbs, J. C. (2012). Inductive discipline, parental expression of disappointed expectations, and moral identity in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 973–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9698-7.
Piquero, A. R., Fagan, J., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., & Odgers, C. (2005). Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Criminal Law Criminology, 96(1), 267–298.
R Core Team. (2019). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Rodrigues, H., & Gomes, A. M. (2019). Formação de atitudes em relação às leis: Um estudo sobre socialização legal de adolescentes em São Paulo [Attitude formation towards laws: a study on legal socialization of adolescents in São Paulo]. Revista Santa Rita, 14(28), 41–48.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
Sears, R. R., Maccoby, E. E., & Levin, H. (1957). Patterns of child rearing. Oxford: Row, Peterson and Co.
Sheehan, M. J., & Watson, M. W. (2008). Reciprocal influences between maternal discipline techniques and aggression in children and adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 34(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20241.
Smetana, J. G. (1983). Social-cognitive development: domain distinctions and coordinations. Developmental Review, 3(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(83)90027-8.
Smetana, J. G. (2000). Middle-class African American adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority and parenting practices: a longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 71, 1672–1686. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1132507.
Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Daddis, C. (2004). Longitudinal development of family decision making: defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle-class African American adolescents. Child Development, 75(5), 1418–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00749.x.
Smetana, J. G., Villalobos, M., Tasopoulos-Chan, M., Gettman, D. C., & Campione-Barr, N. (2009). Early and middle adolescents’ disclosure to parents about activities in different domains. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.010.
Smetana, J. G. (2011). Adolescents, families and social development: How teens construct their worlds. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Smetana, J. G., Ilkhlas, Z., & Wray-Lake, L. (2016). Beliefs about parental authority legitimacy among refugee youth in Jordan: between- and within-person variations. Developmental Psychology, 52(3), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000084.
Teixeira, M. A. P., Oliveira, A. M., & Wottrich, S. H. (2006). Escalas de práticas parentais (EPP): Avaliando dimensões de práticas parentais em relação a adolescentes [Parental practices scales (PPS): evaluating dimensions of parental practices towards adolescents]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Críica, 19(3), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722006000300012.
Thomas, K., Rodrigues, H., Mizutani, A. M., Oliveira, R. T., Piccirillo, D., & Brito, R. C. (2018). Parental legitimacy, procedural justice and adolescent compliance with parental rules among Brazilian preadolescents. International Journal of Child, Youth, and Family Studies, 9(3), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs93201818275.
Trinkner, R., Cohn, E. S., Rebellon, C., & Van Gundy, K. (2012). Don’t trust anyone over 30: parental legitimacy as a mediator between parenting style and changes in delinquent behavior over time. Journal of Adolescence, 35(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.05.003.
Trinkner, R., & Cohn, E. S. (2014). Putting the “social” back in legal socialization: procedural justice, legitimacy, and cynicism in legal and nonlegal authorities. Law & Human Behavior, 38(6), 602–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000107.
Trinkner, R., Rodrigues, H., Veiga, D. P. B., Gifford, F., & Gomes, A. M. (2019). Legal socialisation in Brazil: examining the generalizability of the procedural justice model. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2019.1587710.
Tyler, T. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22(1), 103–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053563.
Tyler, T., Fagan, J., & Geller, A. (2014). Street stops and police legitimacy: teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(4), 751–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12055.
Tyler, T., & Trinkner, R. (2017). Why children follow rules: legal socialization and the development of legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Funding Data of São Paulo Legal Socialization Study (SPLSS) was funded by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), from the 2013–2021 Research, Innovation and Dissemination Centers (RIDCs) grant (no. 2013/07923-7).
K.J.T. conceived of the research question, conducted the literature review, aided in the statistical analysis, compiled all efforts together, and wrote most of the manuscript; H.R. and R.O. conceived of the study design, coordination, and data collection; H.R. aided in the literature review and helped edit the manuscript; R.O. wrote the majority of the methods section; A.A.M. conducted the statistical analysis and drafted the results section. All authors provided feedback on the manuscript, read and approved the final manuscript.
Data Sharing and Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Brazilian National Health Council (CNS) 466/2012 resolution, following the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The board of the local research institute, the School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities (CEP-EACH) from the University of São Paulo (USP), approved this study in September 24th 2015.
Active written informed consent was obtained from all participants’ parents included in the study prior to data collection. Child assent was obtained from all participants after parental consent.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, K.J., Rodrigues, H., de Oliveira, R.T. et al. What Predicts Pre-adolescent Compliance with Family Rules? A Longitudinal Analysis of Parental Discipline, Procedural Justice, and Legitimacy Evaluations. J Youth Adolescence 49, 936–950 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01158-0
- Procedural justice