Skip to main content
Log in

Teachers’ Conditional Regard and Students’ Need Satisfaction and Agentic Engagement: A Multilevel Motivation Mediation Model

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teachers’ conditional positive regard and conditional negative regard are common motivational techniques in the classroom. This study investigated their respective effects on adolescent students’ agentic engagement, while considering students’ basic psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness as potential mediators. Data collected from 30 teachers and 651 7th to 10th graders (52% female) were used to test a multilevel mediation model. The results indicated that teachers’ conditional negative regard undermined students’ agentic engagement by frustrating both of their autonomy and relatedness needs. Teachers’ conditional positive regard thwarted students’ sense of autonomy, which consequently undermined their agentic engagement. The findings are discussed in terms of conditional positive and negative regard as undesirable classroom motivational practices and the mechanisms through which they operate. The discussion also notes the importance of investigating contextual factors at the classroom level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya, J., & Wang, M. T. (2017). Transactional relations between motivational beliefs and help seeking from teachers and peers across adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(8), 1743–1757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., Roth, G., & Deci, E. L. (2004). The emotional costs of perceived parental conditional regard: a self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality, 72(1), 47–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., & Tal, K. (2012). When parents’ affection depends on child’s achievement: parental conditional positive regard, self-aggrandizement, shame and coping in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35(2), 249–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. K., Stolz, H., & Olsen, J. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(4), 1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.

  • Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Development, 38, 1025–1034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L., Slavings, R. L., Harel, K. H., & Emerson, H. (1987). Student passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 60, 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filak, V. F., & Sheldon, K. M. (2008). Teacher support, student motivation, student need satisfaction, and college teacher course evaluations: testing a sequential path model. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 711–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garn, A. C., Morin, A. J., & Lonsdale, C. (2018). Basic psychological need satisfaction toward learning: A longitudinal test of mediation using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 354–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). New maps of development: new visions of maturity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(2), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, J. E., & Norland, E. (2002). Teaching style: where are we now? New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 93, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 412–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanat‐Maymon, Y., Argaman, Y., & Roth, G. (2017). The association between conditional regard and relationship quality: A daily diary study. Personal Relationships, 24(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanat-Maymon, Y., Benjamin, M., Stavsky, A., Shoshani, A., & Roth, G. (2015). The role of basic need fulfillment in academic dishonesty: a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanat‐Maymon, Y., & Reizer, A. (2017). Supervisors’ autonomy support as a predictor of job performance trajectories. Applied Psychology, 66(3), 468–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanat-Maymon, Y., Roth, G., Assor, A., & Raizer, A. (2016). Controlled by love: the harmful relational consequences of perceived conditional positive regard. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 446–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. (2018). Teachers’ autonomy support, autonomy suppression and conditional negative regard as predictors of optimal learning experience among high-achieving Bedouin students. Social Psychology of Education, 21(1), 223–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(2), 249–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., & Kunter, M. (2009). Assessing the impact of learning environments: how to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matos, L., Reeve, J., Herrera, D., & Claux, M. (2018). Students’ agentic engagement predicts longitudinal increases in perceived autonomy-supportive teaching: the squeaky wheel gets the grease. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A. J. S., Abduljabbar, A. S., & Köller, O. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 106–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, P. (2005). Family first: your step-by-step plan for creating a phenomenal family New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinari, L., & Mameli, C. (2018). Basic psychological needs and school engagement: A focus on justice and agency. Social Psychology of Education, 21(1), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Mplus (Version 7.3) [Computer Software]. (1998–2014). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 781–791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, S., Gaudreau, P., Lapointe, M. C., & Lacroix, C. (2007). Does it take three to tango? Psychological need satisfaction and athlete burnout. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38(4), 437–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: the concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2014). Understanding motivation and emotion. 6th ed Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. Self-determination theory: a dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influences on student motivation. In: D. M. McInerney, S. Van Etten, (Eds) (2004). Big theories revisited. (pp. 31–60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

  • Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G., & Assor, A. (2012). The costs of parental pressure to express emotions: conditional regard and autonomy support as predictors of emotion regulation and intimacy. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 799–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: how self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 761–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G., Assor, A., Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The emotional and behavioral consequences of parental conditional regard: comparing positive conditional regard, negative conditional regard, and autonomy support as parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1119–1142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy and the self in psychological development. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 1–56). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2017). Self-determination theory. Basic psychological needs in motivation development, and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian, C., Burnett, S., & Blakemore, S. J. (2008). Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 441–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Niemiec, C. P. (2006). It’s not just the amount that counts: balanced need satisfaction also affects well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 331–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2004). The 10 basic principles of good parenting. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teyber, E. (1997). Interpersonal process in psychotherapy: a relational approach. 3rd ed Boston: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Monte Carlo confidence intervals for complex functions of indirect effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(2), 194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: A historical overview, emerging trends and future directions. In T. Urdan & S. Karabenick (Eds), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 16: The decade ahead (pp. 105–166). Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Publishing.

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 468–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: a systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ Contributions

RC conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript; AM conceived of the study and helped to draft the manuscript; AS participated in the design and coordination of the study and performed the measurement; GR conceived of the study and helped to draft the manuscript; YKM conceived of the study, participated in its design, performed the statistical analyses and coordination, and drafted the manuscript.

Data Sharing and Declaration

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaniv Kanat-Maymon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were approved by the ethical standards of the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center Academic Ethics Committee and the Israeli Ministry of Education and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

All the participants provided the informed consent. Students’ parents gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Israeli Ministry of Education’s ethics committee and the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center Academic Ethics Committee.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, R., Moed, A., Shoshani, A. et al. Teachers’ Conditional Regard and Students’ Need Satisfaction and Agentic Engagement: A Multilevel Motivation Mediation Model. J Youth Adolescence 49, 790–803 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01114-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01114-y

Keywords

Navigation