Abstract
Teachers’ conditional positive regard and conditional negative regard are common motivational techniques in the classroom. This study investigated their respective effects on adolescent students’ agentic engagement, while considering students’ basic psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness as potential mediators. Data collected from 30 teachers and 651 7th to 10th graders (52% female) were used to test a multilevel mediation model. The results indicated that teachers’ conditional negative regard undermined students’ agentic engagement by frustrating both of their autonomy and relatedness needs. Teachers’ conditional positive regard thwarted students’ sense of autonomy, which consequently undermined their agentic engagement. The findings are discussed in terms of conditional positive and negative regard as undesirable classroom motivational practices and the mechanisms through which they operate. The discussion also notes the importance of investigating contextual factors at the classroom level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amemiya, J., & Wang, M. T. (2017). Transactional relations between motivational beliefs and help seeking from teachers and peers across adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(8), 1743–1757.
Assor, A., Roth, G., & Deci, E. L. (2004). The emotional costs of perceived parental conditional regard: a self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality, 72(1), 47–87.
Assor, A., & Tal, K. (2012). When parents’ affection depends on child’s achievement: parental conditional positive regard, self-aggrandizement, shame and coping in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35(2), 249–260.
Barber, B. K., Stolz, H., & Olsen, J. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(4), 1–15.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.
Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.
Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Development, 38, 1025–1034.
Good, T. L., Slavings, R. L., Harel, K. H., & Emerson, H. (1987). Student passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 60, 181–199.
Filak, V. F., & Sheldon, K. M. (2008). Teacher support, student motivation, student need satisfaction, and college teacher course evaluations: testing a sequential path model. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 711–724.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Garn, A. C., Morin, A. J., & Lonsdale, C. (2018). Basic psychological need satisfaction toward learning: A longitudinal test of mediation using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 354–372.
Gilligan, C. (1982). New maps of development: new visions of maturity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(2), 199–212.
Heimlich, J. E., & Norland, E. (2002). Teaching style: where are we now? New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 93, 17–26.
Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 412–428.
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1175–1188.
Kanat‐Maymon, Y., Argaman, Y., & Roth, G. (2017). The association between conditional regard and relationship quality: A daily diary study. Personal Relationships, 24(1), 27–35.
Kanat-Maymon, Y., Benjamin, M., Stavsky, A., Shoshani, A., & Roth, G. (2015). The role of basic need fulfillment in academic dishonesty: a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 1–9.
Kanat‐Maymon, Y., & Reizer, A. (2017). Supervisors’ autonomy support as a predictor of job performance trajectories. Applied Psychology, 66(3), 468–486.
Kanat-Maymon, Y., Roth, G., Assor, A., & Raizer, A. (2016). Controlled by love: the harmful relational consequences of perceived conditional positive regard. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 446–460.
Kaplan, H. (2018). Teachers’ autonomy support, autonomy suppression and conditional negative regard as predictors of optimal learning experience among high-achieving Bedouin students. Social Psychology of Education, 21(1), 223–255.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.
Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(2), 249–277.
Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., & Kunter, M. (2009). Assessing the impact of learning environments: how to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 120–131.
Matos, L., Reeve, J., Herrera, D., & Claux, M. (2018). Students’ agentic engagement predicts longitudinal increases in perceived autonomy-supportive teaching: the squeaky wheel gets the grease. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(4), 1–18.
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A. J. S., Abduljabbar, A. S., & Köller, O. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 106–124.
McGraw, P. (2005). Family first: your step-by-step plan for creating a phenomenal family New York: Free Press.
Molinari, L., & Mameli, C. (2018). Basic psychological needs and school engagement: A focus on justice and agency. Social Psychology of Education, 21(1), 157–172.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Mplus (Version 7.3) [Computer Software]. (1998–2014). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 781–791.
Perreault, S., Gaudreau, P., Lapointe, M. C., & Lacroix, C. (2007). Does it take three to tango? Psychological need satisfaction and athlete burnout. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38(4), 437–450.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: the concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595.
Reeve, J. (2014). Understanding motivation and emotion. 6th ed Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. Self-determination theory: a dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influences on student motivation. In: D. M. McInerney, S. Van Etten, (Eds) (2004). Big theories revisited. (pp. 31–60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 527–540.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267.
Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419–435.
Roth, G., & Assor, A. (2012). The costs of parental pressure to express emotions: conditional regard and autonomy support as predictors of emotion regulation and intimacy. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 799–808.
Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: how self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 761–774.
Roth, G., Assor, A., Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The emotional and behavioral consequences of parental conditional regard: comparing positive conditional regard, negative conditional regard, and autonomy support as parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1119–1142.
Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy and the self in psychological development. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 1–56). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2017). Self-determination theory. Basic psychological needs in motivation development, and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press.
Sebastian, C., Burnett, S., & Blakemore, S. J. (2008). Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 441–446.
Sheldon, K. M., & Niemiec, C. P. (2006). It’s not just the amount that counts: balanced need satisfaction also affects well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 331–341.
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781.
Steinberg, L. (2004). The 10 basic principles of good parenting. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Teyber, E. (1997). Interpersonal process in psychotherapy: a relational approach. 3rd ed Boston: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Monte Carlo confidence intervals for complex functions of indirect effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(2), 194–205.
Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: A historical overview, emerging trends and future directions. In T. Urdan & S. Karabenick (Eds), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 16: The decade ahead (pp. 105–166). Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Publishing.
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246–260.
Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 468–483.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333.
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: a systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37.
Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719.
Authors’ Contributions
RC conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript; AM conceived of the study and helped to draft the manuscript; AS participated in the design and coordination of the study and performed the measurement; GR conceived of the study and helped to draft the manuscript; YKM conceived of the study, participated in its design, performed the statistical analyses and coordination, and drafted the manuscript.
Data Sharing and Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were approved by the ethical standards of the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center Academic Ethics Committee and the Israeli Ministry of Education and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Informed Consent
All the participants provided the informed consent. Students’ parents gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Israeli Ministry of Education’s ethics committee and the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center Academic Ethics Committee.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, R., Moed, A., Shoshani, A. et al. Teachers’ Conditional Regard and Students’ Need Satisfaction and Agentic Engagement: A Multilevel Motivation Mediation Model. J Youth Adolescence 49, 790–803 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01114-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01114-y