Developing Morality, Competence, and Sociability in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study of Gender Differences
- 499 Downloads
Morality, competence, and sociability have been conceptualized as fundamental dimensions of social judgment that individuals use to evaluate themselves and other people and groups. The way in which adolescents perceive themselves along these dimensions affects the quality of their relationships across multiple social contexts. Given the centrality of morality, competence, and sociability for adolescents’ social life, the purpose of this study was to understand how these dimensions develop over time with a focus on gender differences, since males and females can show distinct trajectories due to socialization and developmental processes. Participants were 916 (51.4% girls; Mage = 15.64 years) adolescents involved in a three-wave longitudinal study with annual assessments. The findings highlighted that females reported increasing levels of morality and competence, while males showed decreasing levels in all dimensions. Furthermore, females also showed greater consistency in the configuration of morality, competence, and sociability, and inter-individual differences appeared to be already well-settled in each dimension for both males and females. Overall, this study increases the developmental understanding of how core dimensions of social judgment change in the adolescent phase, highlighting gender differences and similarities.
KeywordsMorality Competence Sociability Gender Development
E.C., S.M., and M.R. conceived the current study; E.C. performed the statistical analyses. E.C., S.M., and M.R. wrote the manuscript; all authors (E.C., S.M., G.K., W.M., R.Z., M.R.) participated in the interpretation of the results and in the drafting of the article; R.Z. is the principal investigator of the POSIDEV project and is responsible for the data collection. All authors read and approved the final paper.
Data of the POSIDEV study were used for this study. POSIDEV was funded by the European Social Fund under the Global Grant measure, VP1-3.1-SMM-07-02-008 assigned to Rita Žukauskienė. Silvia Moscatelli and Monica Rubini received support for working on this article by a grant from the Italian Ministry of Research and Education, University and Research FIRB2012 (Protocollo RBFR128CR6_004) assigned to Silvia Moscatelli.
Data Sharing and Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of the Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius (Lithuania) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants (and from their parents, if minors) included in the study.
- Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology 50, (195–255). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Bem, S. L. (1998). An unconventional family. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Block, J. (1971). Lives through time. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Books.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., Martin, J. M., Peeke, L. G., Seroczynski, A. D., Tram, J. M., & Maschman, T. (2001). The development of multiple domains of child and adolescent self-concept: a cohort sequential longitudinal design. Child Dev, 72, 1723–1746. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crocetti, E., Klimstra, T. A., Hale, III, W. W., Koot, H. M., & Meeus, W. (2013). Impact of early adolescent externalizing problem behaviors on identity development in middle to late adolescence: a prospective 7-year longitudinal study. J Youth Adolesc, 42, 1745–1758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9924-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crocetti, E., Moscatelli, S., Van der Graaff, J., Rubini, M., Meeus, W., & Branje, S. (2016). The interplay of self-certainty and prosocial development in the transition from late adolescence to emerging adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 30, 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crocetti, E., Moscatelli, S., Kaniušonytė, G., Branje, S., Žukauskienė, R., & Rubini, M. (2018). Adolescents’ self-perception of morality, competence, and sociability and their Interplay with quality of family, friend, and school relationships: a three-wave longitudinal study. J Youth Adolesc, 47, 1743–1754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0864-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., Branje, S., Koot, H. M., & Meeus, W. (2016). Self-concept clarity in adolescents and parents: a six-wave longitudinal and multi-informant study on development and intergenerational transmission. J Pers, 84, 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Strycker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: a social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.) Handbook of social psychology. 4th edn, Vol. 1. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Harter, S. (1988). The self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.Google Scholar
- Kanka, M.H., Wagner, P., Buchmann, M., & Spiel, C. (2017). Gender-stereotyped preferences in childhood and early adolescence: A comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal data. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1365703.
- Leach, C. W., Bilali, R., & Pagliaro, S. (2015). Groups and morality. In J. Simpson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA Handbook of personality and social psychology. Interpersonal Relationships and Group Processes, Vol. 2, (123–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Lerner, R. M. & Steinberg, L. (Eds.) (2009). Handbook of adolescent psychology. 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Lodi-Smith, J., & Crocetti, E. (2018). Self-concept clarity development across the lifespan. In J. Lodi-Smith & K. G. DeMarree(Eds.), Self-concept clarity: Perspectives on assessment, research, and applications (pp. 67–84). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Meeus, W. (2019). Adolescent development. Longitudinal research into self, personal relationships, and psychopathology. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Meeus, W., van de Schoot, R., Keijsers, L., Schwartz, S. J., & Branje, S. (2010). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: a five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Child Dev, 81, 1565–1581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01492.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moscatelli, S., Menegatti, M., Ellemers, N., Mariani, M.G., & Rubini, M. (2018). The Lehman Sisters would not be hired: The ‘Perfection bias’, or rather, the heavy weight of morality and competence hindering women’s selection. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
- Mroczek, D.K. (2007). The analysis of longitudinal data in personality research. In R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley & R.F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 543–556). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide. 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. 2016.Google Scholar
- Pagliaro, S., Ellemers, N., Barreto, M., & Di Cesare, C. (2016). Once dishonest, always dishonest? the impact of perceived pervasiveness of moral evaluations of the self on motivation to restore a moral reputation. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00586. 7(APR).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Prati, F., Menegatti, M., Moscatelli, S., Kana Kenfack, C.S., Pireddu, S., Crocetti, E., Mariani, M.G., & Rubini, M. (2018). Are mixed gender committees less biased towards female and male employees? A linguistic analysis of competence, morality and sociability in performance appraisal. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
- Prati, F., Vasiljevic, M., Crisp, R. J., & Rubini, M. (2015). Some extended psychological benefits of challenging social stereotypes: decreased dehumanization and a reduced reliance on heuristic thinking. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18, 801–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214567762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Preacher, K. J. (2010). Latent growth curve models. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 185–198). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Metzger, A. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psy, 57, 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smetana, J. G (2013). Moral development: The Social domain theory view. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (Vol. 1): body and mind. (832–863). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stewart, A. L., Pratto, F., Bou Zeineddine, F., Sweetman, J., Eicher, V., Licata, L., … van Stekelenburg, J. (2016). International support for the arab uprisings: Understanding sympathetic collective action using theories of social dominance and social identity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19, 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214558310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Žukauskienė, R., Raižienė, S., Malinauskienė, O., Gabrialavičiūtė, I., Garckija, R., Vosylis, R., Kaniušonytė, G., Truskauskaitė-Kunevičienė, I., & Kajokienė, I. (2015). Pozityvi jaunimo raida Lietuvoje [Positive Youth Development in Lithuania]. Vilnius: MRU.Google Scholar