Skip to main content

Table 2 Hierarchical regression analysis with body dissatisfaction as dependent variable

From: Social Media and Body Dissatisfaction: Investigating the Attenuating Role of Positive Parent–Adolescent Relationships

 Model 1Model 2Model 3
VariableBSE95% BCIβBSE95% BCIβBSE95% BCIβ
Age0.180.04[0.11, 0.29]0.22***0.160.04[0.09, 0.23]0.20***0.160.04[0.09, 0.23]0.20***
Gender1.030.13[0.77, 1.29]0.36***1.110.14[0.84, 1.37]0.39***1.100.13[0.84, 1.36]0.39***
Social media use0.190.05[0.10, 0.29]0.19***0.190.05[0.10, 0.29]0.19***0.180.05[0.09, 0.28]0.18***
Positive father–adolescent relationship    −0.130.10[−0.33, 0.06]−0.06−0.160.09[−0.36, 0.02]−0.07
Positive mother–adolescent relationship    −0.300.10[−0.56, −0.02]−0.13**−0.270.13[−0.52, −0.01]−0.12*
Social media use x Positive father–adolescent relationship        0.030.07[−0.12, 0.17]0.02
Social media use x Positive mother–adolescent relationship        −0.200.08[−0.36, −0.04]−0.12**
R2 0.24   0.27  0.28   
ΔR2 0.24   0.02  0.01   
F for change in R2 44.33***   6.80**  3.74*   
  1. Note.
  2. * p < .05, ** p< .01, *** p < .001