Abstract
Experiences of depression, anxiety, and peer victimization have each been found to predict one another, and to predict negative outcomes in the domains of school connectedness, social functioning, quality of life, and physical health. However, the common co-occurrence of depression, anxiety, and peer victimization experiences has made it difficult to disentangle their unique roles in these associations. The present study thus sought to characterize the precise nature of the bidirectional relationships between depressive symptoms, anxiety, and victimization over time, and to examine their unique sequelae during the transition from childhood to early adolescence. Longitudinal multi-informant (child-reported, parent-reported, and teacher-reported) data from a nationally representative sample were analyzed using path analysis when the study child was aged 10–11 (n= 4169; Mage = 10.3; 48.8% female) and aged 12–13 (n= 3956; Mage = 12.4; 48.2% female). Depressive symptoms, anxiety, and peer victimization had small but significant unique bidirectional relationships. All three constructs also uniquely and prospectively predicted poorer life functioning across all domains examined. These results demonstrate that current interventions should broaden their scope to simultaneously target depression, anxiety, and peer victimization, as each of these experiences independently act as additive risk factors for subsequent negative outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Comparing participants with data at both waves (age 10–11 and age 12–13; n= 3862) to those with data only at age 10–11 (n = 307) suggested that the FIML assumption of missing at random was appropriate. Specifically, comparing the participants on all study variables at age 10–11 (see Table 2) showed that the two groups had no differences exceeding a small standardized effect size (Cohen’s d and φdf =1 ≤ .1). The proportion of participants who spoke English as their main language at home did differ significantly (90.1% of retained participants compared to 82.2% of attrited participants, χ2(1) = 18.44, p < .001), but this difference was associated with only a small effect size (φ = .067). No other variables were associated with significant group differences.
As a final check whether aggregation was appropriate, the 99% confidence intervals were compared for each path for the aggregated informants’ reports of depression, anxiety, and peer victimization to the results analyzing the four informants separately (i.e., testing whether the paths differed significantly based on an uncorrected significance level of p< .01). The results based on individual informants did not differ significantly from the aggregated reports for any of the cross-lagged paths. Children and teachers had significantly weaker autoregressive paths for anxiety and peer victimization compared to the aggregated response results, although these relationships did remain positive and statistically significant (ps < .001). The consistency in these analyses supported the decision to aggregate.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th Edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Angold, A., Costello, E. J., Messer, S. C., & Pickles, A. (1995). Development of a short questionnaire for use in epidemiological studies of depression in children and adolescents. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 5, 237–249.
Arseneault, L. (2017). The long-term impact of bullying victimization on mental health. World Psychiatry, 16, 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20399.
Becker, A., Hagenberg, N., Roessner, V., Woerner, W., & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: Do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adult informants? European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, ii17–ii24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-004-2004-4.
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive theory and the emotional disorders. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 57, 289–300.
Besag, V. (1989). Bullies and victims in schools: a guide to understanding and management. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Bogart, L. M., Elliott, M. N., Klein, D. J., Tortolero, S. R., Mrug, S., Peskin, M. F., & Schuster, M. A. (2014). Peer victimization in fifth grade and health in tenth grade. Pediatrics, 133, 440–447. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3510.
Brown, R. D., & Hauenstein, N. M. (2005). Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rwg indices. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105275376.
Burke, M. J., & Dunlap, W. P. (2002). Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: A user’s guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102005002002.
Craig, W., Harel-Fisch, Y., Fogel-Grinvald, H., Dostaler, S., Hetland, J., Simons-Morton, B., & Pickett, W. (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 216–224.
De Los Reyes, A., Augenstein, T. M., Wang, M., Thomas, S. A., Drabick, D. A. G., Burgers, D. E., & Rabinowitz, J. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 858–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038498.
De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2006). Conceptualizing changes in behavior in intervention research: The range of possible changes model. Psychological Review, 113, 554–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.554.
De Los Reyes, A., Thomas, S. A., Goodman, K. L., & Kundey, S. M. (2013). Principles underlying the use of multiple informants’ reports. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185617.
Dixon, M. A., & Cunningham, G. B. (2006). Data aggregation in multilevel analysis: A review of conceptual and statistical issues. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 10, 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee1002_2.
Enders, C. K. (2011). Analyzing longitudinal data with missing values. Rehabilitation Psychology, 56, 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025579.
Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v02n02_08.
Forrest, W., & Edwards, B. (2015) The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children Annual statistical report 2014. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Garber, J., & Weersing, V. R. (2010). Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in youth: Implications for treatment and prevention.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17, 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01221.x.
Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 79–90.
Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L., & Ploubidis, G. B. (2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x.
Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.
Graham, S., Bellmore, A., & Juvonen, J. (2014). Peer victimization in middle school: When self-and peer views diverge. Vol. 121, Bullying, Victimization, and Peer Harassment: A Handbook of Prevention and Intervention.
Griffith, J. W., Zinbarg, R. E., Craske, M. G., Mineka, S., Rose, R. D., Waters, A. M., & Sutton, J. M. (2010). Neuroticism as a common dimension in the internalizing disorders. Psychological Medicine, 40, 1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709991449.
Hamilton, J. L., Potter, C. M., Olino, T. M., Abramson, L. Y., Heimberg, R. G., & Alloy, L. B. (2016). The temporal sequence of social anxiety and depressive symptoms following interpersonal stressors during adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 495–509, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0049-0
Hawker, D. S., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00629.
Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., & Totzek, D. (2012). Using multi-informant designs to address key informant and common method bias. In A. Diamantopoulos, W. Fritz & L. Hildebrandt (Eds.), Quantitative marketing and marketing management (pp. 81–102). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
Hunt, C. (2015). Understanding and combating school-based bullying from an individual-level perspective: A review. Australian Psychologist, 50, 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12093.
Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70, 293–299.
Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 159–185.
Juvonen, J., Wang, Y., & Espinoza, G. (2011). Bullying experiences and comprimised academic performance across middle school grades. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431610379415.
Kljakovic, M., & Hunt, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of predictors of bullying and victimisation in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 134–145.
Kokkinos, C. M., & Kipritsi, E. (2012). The relationship between bullying, victimization, trait emotional intelligence, self-efficacy and empathy among preadolescents. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9168-9.
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2007). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642.
Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford press, New York, NY.
Luchetti, S., & Rapee, R. M. (2014). Liking and perceived probability of victimization of peers displaying behaviors characteristic of anxiety and depression. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 5, 212–223. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.036913.
Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007.
Moore, S. E., Norman, R. E., Suetani, S., Thomas, H. J., Sly, P. D., & Scott, J. G. (2017). Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry, 7, 60.
Muris, P., Meesters, C., & van den Berg, F. (2003). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-003-0298-2.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. 2012.
Nanni, V., Uher, R., & Danese, A. (2012). Childhood maltreatment predicts unfavorable course of illness and treatment outcome in depression: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 141–151.
Olweus, D. (1996). The Revised Olweus Bullying Questionnaire. Mimeo: University of Bergen, Norway Bergen.
Ranta, K., Kaltiala-Heino, R., Pelkonen, M., & Marttunen, M. (2009). Associations between peer victimization, self-reported depression and social phobia among adolescents: The role of comorbidity. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 77–93.
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34, 244–252.
Roth, D. A., Coles, M. E., & Heimberg, R. G. (2002). The relationship between memories for childhood teasing and anxiety and depression in adulthood. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 16, 149–164.
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007.
Schacter, H. L., & Juvonen, J. (2017). Depressive symptoms, friend distress, and self-blame: Risk factors for adolescent peer victimization. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 51, 35–43.
Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Nakamoto, J., & Toblin, R. L. (2005). Victimization in the peer group and children’s academic functioning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 425.
Sentse, M., Kretschmer, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The longitudinal interplay between bullying, victimization, and social status: Age‐related and gender differences. Social Development, 24, 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12115.
Sentse, M., Prinzie, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2017). Testing the direction of longitudinal paths between victimization, peer rejection, and different types of internalizing problems in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45, 1013–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0216-y.
Smith, P. K., Talamelli, L., Cowie, H., Naylor, P., & Chauhan, P. (2004). Profiles of non-victims, escaped victims, continuing victims and new victims of school bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007099042376427.
Snyder, J., Prichard, J., Schrepferman, L., Patrick, M. R., & Stoolmiller, M. (2004). Child impulsiveness—inattention, early peer experiences, and the development of early onset conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 579–594.
Soloff, C., Lawrence, D., & Johnstone, R. (2005). Longitudinal Study of Australian Children technical paper no. 1: Sample design. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Spear, L. P. (2009). Heightened stress responsivity and emotional reactivity during pubertal maturation: Implications for psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 87–97.
Stapinski, L. A., Araya, R., Heron, J., Montgomery, A. A., & Stallard, P. (2015). Peer victimization during adolescence: Concurrent and prospective impact on symptoms of depression and anxiety. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28, 105–120.
Takizawa, R., Maughan, B., & Arseneault, L. (2014). Adult health outcomes of childhood bullying victimization: Evidence from a five-decade longitudinal British birth cohort. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 777–784. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13101401.
Trosper, S. E., Whitton, S. W., Brown, T. A., & Pincus, D. B. (2012). Understanding the latent structure of the emotional disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 621–632.
Van Bruggen, G. H., Lilien, G. L., & Kacker, M. (2002). Informants in organizational marketing research: Why use multiple informants and how to aggregate responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.4.469.19117.
Wagner, S. M., Rau, C., & Lindemann, E. (2010). Multiple informant methodology: A critical review and recommendations. Sociological Methods and Research, 38, 582–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124110366231.
Wang, C. (2011). A longitudinal investigation of peer victimization, self-esteem, depression, and anxiety among adolescents: A test of cognitive diathesis-stress theory. Public Access Theses and Dissertations from the College of Education and Human Sciences. 110. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsdiss/110.
Acknowledgements
This article uses unit record data from Growing Up in Australia, the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. The study is conducted in partnership between the Department of Social Services (DSS), the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). The findings and views reported in this article are those of the authors and should not be attributed to DSS, AIFS, or the ABS.
Authors’ Contributions
M.K.F. and R.M.R. conceived of the study; M.K.F. designed and conducted the statistical analyses, interpreted the results, drafted the Abstract, Method, Results, and Discussion, and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content; S.F. wrote the first draft of the Introduction, and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content; N.R.M. wrote subsequent drafts of the Introduction, contributed to the revised discussion, and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content; R.M.R. participated in drafting all sections of the manuscript, and revised the full manuscript critically for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported in part by a National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) training grant supporting the work of M.K.F. (T320A037183), an Australian Research Council (ARC) Laureate Fellowship grant supporting the work of M.K.F., N.R.M., and R.M.R. (FL150100096), and a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) grant supporting the work of R.M.R. (APP1047185). NIDA ARC, and NHMRC had no further role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in writing; nor in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Data Sharing and Declaration
The data that support the findings of this study were obtained from the Department of Social Services under license. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, so they are not publicly available.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children was approved by the Australian Institute of Family Studies Ethics Committee. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
All individual participants provided informed consent.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forbes, M.K., Fitzpatrick, S., Magson, N.R. et al. Depression, Anxiety, and Peer Victimization: Bidirectional Relationships and Associated Outcomes Transitioning from Childhood to Adolescence. J Youth Adolescence 48, 692–702 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0922-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0922-6