Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 47, Issue 11, pp 2414–2423 | Cite as

Who Becomes a Bullying Perpetrator After the Experience of Bullying Victimization? The Moderating Role of Self-esteem

  • Boungho Choi
  • Soowon Park
Empirical Research

Abstract

It is well known that victims of bullying could become a bullying perpetrator later on. However, there are some cases where victims do not become bullies after being bullied. What constitutes the differences between the two groups, who show different response strategies despite the similar experiences of victimization, is the main question that the current study poses. Based on the threatened egotism theory, the current longitudinal study postulates that there could be possible moderating effects of self-esteem in the relationship between prior bullying victimization and subsequent bullying perpetration. The data was drawn from 3,660 Korean secondary students (51.5% male) in the Seoul Education Longitudinal Study for 2 waves (7th to 8th grades). The results from structural equation modeling indicated that there is a significant interaction effect between bullying victimization and self-esteem in the 7th grade, in prediction to bullying perpetration in the 8th grade, after controlling for the prior level of bullying victimization and perpetration experiences, demographic and background characteristics (i.e., gender and family income), students’ school-environmental factor (i.e., perceived seriousness of school bullying), individual factor (i.e., self-control) and family-environmental factor (i.e., parent–child relationship). Students with higher self-esteem were the most likely to engage in future bullying perpetration in response to bullying victimization, while the students with lower self-esteem were the least likely to engage in future bullying perpetration. Educators who examine adolescents’ social problems should pay closer attention to self-esteem, as well as their bullying and victimization experiences, in order to provide appropriate interventions.

Keywords

Bullying victimization Bullying perpetration Self-esteem Moderating effects 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

BC conceived of the study, participated in its design and performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript; SP participated in the interpretation of the data and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Sharing and Declaration

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Seoul Education Research & Information Institute but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. However, data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the Seoul Education Research & Information Institute (http://www.serii.re.kr/board/lst.do?method=getList&mcode=S021&page=1).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armsden, G. C., McCauley, E., Greenberg, M. T., Burke, P. M., & Mitchell, J. R. (1990). Parent and peer attachment in early adolescent depression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 683–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbuckle, J. L (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In: In G. A. Marcoulides, R. E. Schumacker, (eds.) Advanced structural equationmodeling: Issues and techniques. (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Averdijk, M., Van Genlder, J. L., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2016). Violence begets violence … but how? A decision-making perspective on the victim-offender. Criminology, 54(2), 282–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Barboza, G. E., Schiamberg, L. B., Oehmke, J., Korzeniewski, S. J., Post, L. A., & Heraux, C. G. (2009). Individual characteristics and the multiple contexts of adolescent bullying: an ecological perspective. Journal of Youth and adolescence, 38(1), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barker, E. D., Arseneault, L., Brendgen, M., Fontaine, N., & Maughan, B. (2008). Joint development of bullying and victimization in adolescence: relations to delinquency and self-harm. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(9), 1030–1038.Google Scholar
  8. Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: the dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103(1), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulton, M. J., Smith, P. K., & Cowie, H. (2010). Short-term longitudinal relationships between children’s peer victimization/bullying experiences and self-perceptions evidence for reciprocity. School Psychology International, 31(3), 296–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Camodeca, M., Goossens, F. A., Terwogt, M. M., & Schuengel, C. (2002). Bullying and victimization among school‐age children: stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. Social Development, 11(3), 332–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catherine, P. B., & Renee, M. J. (2011). The social context of bullying and peer victimization: an introduction to the special issue. Journal of School Violence, 10(2), 107–114.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2011.557145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cho, S., & Wooldredge, J. (2016). The link between juvenile offending and victimization: Sources of change over time in bullying victimization risk among South Korean adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 71, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenberger, E., Chen, C., Dmitrieva, J., & Farruggia, S. P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: do they matter? Personality and Individual differences, 35(6), 1241–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes on covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structual Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunter, S. C., Boyle, J. M., & Warden, D. (2007). Perceptions and correlates of peer‐victimization and bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 797–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jennings, W. G., Piquero, A. R., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: a review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(1), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jose, P. E., Kljakovic, M., Scheib, E., & Notter, O. (2012). The joint development of traditional bullying and victimization with cyber bullying and victimization in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(2), 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamphaus, R. W., & Frick, P. J. (1996). Clinical assessment of child and adolescent personality and behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  21. Keith, T. Z. (2014). Multiple regression and beyond: an introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kort-Butler, L. A. (2010). Experienced and vicarious victimization: do social support and self-esteem prevent delinquent responses? Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kokkinos, C. M., & Kipritsi, E. (2012). The relationship between bullying, victimization, trait emotional intelligence, self-efficacy and empathy among preadolescents. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laible, D. J., Carlo, G., & Roesch, S. C. (2004). Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: the role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviours. Journal of adolescence, 27(6), 703–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marsh, H. W., Parada, R. H., Craven, G., & Finger, L. (2004). In the looking glass: a reciprocal effects model elucidating the complex nature of bullying, psychological determinants and the central role of self-concept. In C. E. Sanders & G. D. Phye (Eds.), Bullying implications for the classroom (pp. 63–135). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9(3), 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nansel, T. R., Haynie, D. L., & Simonsmorton, B. G. (2003). The association of bullying and victimization with middle school adjustment. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nickerson, A, Mele, D., & Osborne-Oliver, K. M. (2010). Parent–child relationships and bullying. In: S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, D. L. Espelage, (eds.) Handbook of bullying in schools:An international perspective . (pp. 187–197). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Olweus, D. (2007). The Olweus bullying questionnaire. Center City, MN: Hazelden.Google Scholar
  30. Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 751–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pitts, S. C., West, S. G., & Tein, J. Y. (1996). Longitudinal measurement models in evaluation research: examining stability and change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19(4), 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: a meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodkin, P. C., Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R., & Wilson, T. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Salmivalli, C. (2001). Feeling good about oneself, being bad to others? Remarks on self-esteem, hostility, and aggressive behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(4), 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schneider, D. J., & Turkat, D. (1975). Self‐presentation following success or failure: defensive self‐esteem models. Journal of Personality, 43(1), 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children’s peer groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28(2), 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwartz, D., Proctor, L. J., & Chien, D. H. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 147–174). New York/London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38(152), 735–747.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Seoul Education Research & Information Institute. (2011), SELS 2010 User’s Manual. (Report No. 2011-17). Retrieved from Seoul Education Research & Information Institute website:http://www.serii.re.kr/board/viw.do?method=boardview&mcode=S021&seq=14501&listType=.
  41. Solberg, M. E., Olweus, D., & Endresen, I. M. (2007). Bullies and victims at school: are they the same pupils? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsaousis, I. (2016). The relationship of self-esteem to bullying perpetration and peer victimization among schoolchildren and adolescents: a meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education DepartmentKorean National Police UniversityAsanRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of EducationSejong UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations