School Security Measures and Longitudinal Trends in Adolescents’ Experiences of Victimization
- 849 Downloads
Although school security measures have become a common fixture in public schools across the United States, research on the relationship between security and adolescent victimization is mixed, with very few studies examining trends in adolescent victimization across time. Using two waves of data from the Educational Longitudinal Study 2002 (N = 7659; 50.6% female; 56.7% White, 13.3% Black, 13.5% Hispanic, 11.3% Asian American, 5.4% other race), results from a series of multi-level models demonstrate that adolescents in schools with more security measures report higher odds of being threatened with harm, and no difference in odds of being in a physical altercation or having something stolen over time. Although prior research has established racial disparities in using school security measures, results demonstrate inconsistent patterns in the extent to which adolescents’ race conditions the relationship between security and victimization. The findings are discussed in light of existing theoretical and empirical work, and implications for both research and practice are offered.
KeywordsSchool security Victimization Race School safety
B.W.F. and T.J.M. conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, conducted data analysis, and drafted the manuscript; J.H.B. assisted with data analysis and interpretation. All authors read and approved the final submission of this manuscript.
Data Sharing Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Educational Data Analysis Tool repository, https://nces.ed.gov/edat/index.aspx?agrmnt=1.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
All participants in the original study from which these data were derived provided informed consent. Because this manuscript uses deidentified secondary data, we do not have copies of the informed consent forms.
- Blalock, H. (1967). Towards a theory of minority group relations. New York, NY: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
- Casella, R. (2003). The false allure of security technologies. Social Justice, 30, 82–93.Google Scholar
- de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Devine, J. (1996). Maximum security: The culture of violence in inner-city schools. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Devlin, D. N., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2017). The roles of police officers in schools: Effects on the recording and reporting of crime. Youth Violence and Juvenile Jusitce. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016680405.
- Hirschfield, P. (2010). School surveillance in America: Disparate and unequal. In T. Monahan & R. D. Torres (Eds.), Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in public education (pp. 38–54). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Kupchik, A. (2016). The real school safety problem: Policing and punishment in American schools. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Liska, A. (1992). Social threat and social control. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Mayer, M. J., & Leone, P. (1999). A structural analysis of school violence and disruption: Implications for creating safer schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 333–356.Google Scholar
- McCahill, M., & Finn, R. (2010). The social impact of surveillance in three UK schools: Angels, devils and teen mums. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 273–289.Google Scholar
- Mowen, T. J., & Parker, K. P. (2017). Minority threat and school security: Assessing the impact of Black and Hispanic student representation on school security measures, security. Journal, 30, 504–522.Google Scholar
- Musu-Gillette, L., Zhang, A., Wang, K., Zhang, J., & Oudekerk, B. A. (2017). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2016 (NCES 2017-064/NCJ 250650). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Educational longitudinal study of 2002. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/.
- Nickerson, A. B., & Martens, M. P. (2008). School violence: Associations with control, security/enforcement, educational/therapeutic approaches, and demographic factors. School Psychology Review, 37, 228–243.Google Scholar
- Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. Third Edition TX: College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Second Edition Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Royston, P., & White, I. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE): Implementation in STATA. Journal of Statistical Society, 45, 1–20.Google Scholar
- Skiba, R. J., & Rausch, M. K. (2006). Zero tolerance, suspension, and expulsion: Questions of equity and effectiveness. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1063–1089). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Wacquant, L. (2001). Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. In D. Garland (Ed.), Mass imprisonment: Social causes and consequences (pp. 82–120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Weiss, J. (2008). Under the radar: School surveillance and youth resistance. City University of New York.Google Scholar