Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 1221–1237 | Cite as

School Security Measures and Longitudinal Trends in Adolescents’ Experiences of Victimization

  • Benjamin W. FisherEmail author
  • Thomas J. MowenEmail author
  • John H. BomanIVEmail author
Empirical Research

Abstract

Although school security measures have become a common fixture in public schools across the United States, research on the relationship between security and adolescent victimization is mixed, with very few studies examining trends in adolescent victimization across time. Using two waves of data from the Educational Longitudinal Study 2002 (N = 7659; 50.6% female; 56.7% White, 13.3% Black, 13.5% Hispanic, 11.3% Asian American, 5.4% other race), results from a series of multi-level models demonstrate that adolescents in schools with more security measures report higher odds of being threatened with harm, and no difference in odds of being in a physical altercation or having something stolen over time. Although prior research has established racial disparities in using school security measures, results demonstrate inconsistent patterns in the extent to which adolescents’ race conditions the relationship between security and victimization. The findings are discussed in light of existing theoretical and empirical work, and implications for both research and practice are offered.

Keywords

School security Victimization Race School safety 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

B.W.F. and T.J.M. conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, conducted data analysis, and drafted the manuscript; J.H.B. assisted with data analysis and interpretation. All authors read and approved the final submission of this manuscript.

Data Sharing Declaration

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Educational Data Analysis Tool repository, https://nces.ed.gov/edat/index.aspx?agrmnt=1.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

All participants in the original study from which these data were derived provided informed consent. Because this manuscript uses deidentified secondary data, we do not have copies of the informed consent forms.

References

  1. Azur, M. J., Stuart, E. A., Frangakis, C., & Leaf, P. J. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20, 40–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Blalock, H. (1967). Towards a theory of minority group relations. New York, NY: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
  3. Blosnich, J., & Bossarte, R. (2011). Low-level violence in schools: Is there an association between school safety measures and peer victimization? Journal of School Health, 81, 107–113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. The Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bracy, N. (2011). Student perceptions of high-security school environments. Youth & Society, 43, 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burrow, J. D., & Apel, R. (2008). Youth behavior, school structure, and student risk of victimization. Justice Quarterly, 25, 349–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casella, R. (2003). The false allure of security technologies. Social Justice, 30, 82–93.Google Scholar
  8. Cheurprakobkit, S., & Bartsch, R. A. (2005). Security measures on school crime in Texas middle and high schools. Educational Research, 47, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawford, C., & Burns, R. (2016). Reducing school violence: Considering school characteristics and the impacts of law enforcement, school security, and environmental factors. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39, 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford, C., Chiricos, T., & Kleck, G. (1998). Race, racial threat, and sentencing of habitual offenders. Criminology, 36, 481–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuellar, M. J. (2018). School safety strategies and their effects on the occurrence of school-based violence in U.S. high schools: An exploratory study. Journal of School Violence, 17, 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Devine, J. (1996). Maximum security: The culture of violence in inner-city schools. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Devlin, D. N., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2017). The roles of police officers in schools: Effects on the recording and reporting of crime. Youth Violence and Juvenile Jusitce.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016680405.
  16. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerlinger, J., & Wo, J. C. (2016). Preventing school bullying: Should schools prioritize an authoritative school discipline approach over security measures? Journal of School Violence, 15, 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilreath, T. D., Astor, R. A., Estrada, J. N., Benbenishty, R., & Unger, J. B. (2013). School victimization and substance use among adolescents in California. Prevention Science, 15, 897–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, D. (1989). Comparison of 1-, 2-, and 3-parameter IRT models. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirschfield, P. J. (2008). Preparing for prison? The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology, 12, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirschfield, P. (2010). School surveillance in America: Disparate and unequal. In T. Monahan & R. D. Torres (Eds.), Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in public education (pp. 38–54). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Howard, A. K., Flora, J., & Griffin, M. (1999). Violence-prevention programs in schools: State of the science and implications for future research. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jennings, W. G., Khey, D. N., Maskaly, J., & Donner, C. M. (2011). Evaluating the relationship between law enforcement and school security measures and violent crime in schools. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 11, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kupchik, A. (2016). The real school safety problem: Policing and punishment in American schools. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kupchik, A., & Catlaw, T. J. (2015). Discipline and participation: The long-term effects of suspension and school security on public engagement of youth. Youth & Society, 47, 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kupchik, A., & Monahan, T. (2006). The New American School: Preparation for post-industrial discipline. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 617–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kupchik, A., & Ward, G. (2014). Race, poverty, and exclusionary school security: An empirical analysis of U.S. elementary, middle, and high schools. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 12, 332–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liska, A. (1992). Social threat and social control. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mayer, M. J., & Leone, P. (1999). A structural analysis of school violence and disruption: Implications for creating safer schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 333–356.Google Scholar
  31. McCahill, M., & Finn, R. (2010). The social impact of surveillance in three UK schools: Angels, devils and teen mums. Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 273–289.Google Scholar
  32. McEvoy, A., & Welker, R. (2000). Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate: A critical review. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mowen, T. J. (2017). The collateral consequences of “criminalized” school punishment on disadvantaged parents and families. The Urban Review, 49, 832–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mowen, T. J., & Brent, J. J. (2016). School discipline as a turning point: The cumulative effect of suspension on arrest. Journal of Research in Crimean and Delinquency, 53, 628–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mowen, T. J., & Manierre, M. (2017). School security measures and extracurricular participation: An exploratory multi-level analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38, 344–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mowen, T. J., & Parker, K. P. (2017). Minority threat and school security: Assessing the impact of Black and Hispanic student representation on school security measures, security. Journal, 30, 504–522.Google Scholar
  37. Musu-Gillette, L., Zhang, A., Wang, K., Zhang, J., & Oudekerk, B. A. (2017). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2016 (NCES 2017-064/NCJ 250650). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  38. Na, C., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: Effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30, 619–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakamoto, J., & Schwartz, D. (2010). Is peer victimization associated with academic achievement? A meta-analytic review. Social Development, 19, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Educational longitudinal study of 2002. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/.
  41. Nickerson, A. B., & Martens, M. P. (2008). School violence: Associations with control, security/enforcement, educational/therapeutic approaches, and demographic factors. School Psychology Review, 37, 228–243.Google Scholar
  42. Nolan, K. (2011). Police in the hallways: Discipline in an urban high school. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Osgood, D. W., McMorris, B. J., & Potenza, M. T. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance: Item response theory scaling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paccagnella, O. (2006). Centering or not centering in multilevel models? The role of the group mean and the assessment of group effects. Evaluation Review, 30, 66–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Poteat, V. P., Scheer, J. R., DiGiovanni, C. D., & Mereish, E. H. (2014). Short-term prospective effects of homophobic victimization on the mental health of heterosexual adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1240–1251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. Third Edition TX: College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  48. Raskauskas, J. (2010). Multiple peer victimization among elementary school students: Relations with social-emotional problems. Social Psychology Oregon Education, 13, 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Second Edition Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., Boelen, P. A., van der Schoot, M., & Telch, M. J. (2011). Prospective linkages between peer victimization and externalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 215–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Royston, P., & White, I. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE): Implementation in STATA. Journal of Statistical Society, 45, 1–20.Google Scholar
  53. Ruck, M. D., & Wortley, S. (2002). Racial and ethnic minority high school students’ perceptions of school disciplinary practices: A look at some Canadian findings. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schreck, C. J., & Miller, J. M. (2003). Sources of fear of crime at school: What is the relative contribution of disorder, individual characteristics, and school security? Journal of School Violence, 2, 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sevigny, E. L., & Zhang, G. (2016). Do barriers to crime prevention moderate the effects of situational crime prevention policies on violent crime in high schools? Journal of School Violence, 17, 164–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., & Peterson, R. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34, 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Skiba, R. J., & Rausch, M. K. (2006). Zero tolerance, suspension, and expulsion: Questions of equity and effectiveness. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1063–1089). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Steinka-Fry, K. T., Fisher, B. W., & Tanner-Smith, E. E. (2016). Visible school security measures across diverse middle and high school settings: Typologies and predictors. Journal of Applied Security Research, 11, 422–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Fisher, B. W. (2016). Visible school security measures and student academic performance, attendance, and postsecondary aspirations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 195–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Tanner-Smith, E. E., Fisher, B. W., Addington, L. A., & Gardella, J. H. (2017). Adding security, but subtracting safey? Exploring schools’ use of multiple visible security measures. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 102–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, E. (2010). I spy with my little eye: The use of CCTV in schools and the impact on privacy. The Sociological Review, 58, 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Theriot, M. T. (2009). School resource officers and the criminalization of student behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., & Losel, F. (2012). School bullying as a predictor of violence later in life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Von Hipple, P. T. (2007). Regression with missing Y’s: An improved strategy for analyzing multiple imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37, 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wacquant, L. (2001). Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. In D. Garland (Ed.), Mass imprisonment: Social causes and consequences (pp. 82–120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  66. Weiss, J. (2008). Under the radar: School surveillance and youth resistance. City University of New York.Google Scholar
  67. White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues for guidance and practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 377–399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations