The Co-evolution of Bullying Perpetration, Homophobic Teasing, and a School Friendship Network
- 1.1k Downloads
Bullying and homophobic teasing behaviors affect the lives of many school aged children, often co-occur, and tend to peak in middle school. While bullying and homophobic teasing behaviors are known to be peer group phenomena, studies typically examine the associations at the individual or school levels. An examination of these behaviors at the peer group level can aid in our understanding of the formation and maintenance of peer groups that engage in these forms of aggressive behavior (selection), and the extent to which friends and the peer group impact individual rates of these aggressive behaviors (influence). In this longitudinal study, we assess the co-evolution of friendship networks, bullying perpetration, and homophobic teasing among middle school students (n = 190) using a Stochastic Actor-Based Model (SABM) for longitudinal networks. Data were collected from 6–8th-grade students (Baseline age 12–15; 53% Female; 47% Male) across three waves of data. The sample was diverse with 58% African American, 31% White, and 11% Hispanic. Since bullying and homophobic teasing behaviors are related yet distinct forms of peer aggression, to capture the unique and combined effects of these behaviors we ran models separately and then together in a competing model. Results indicated that on average individuals with higher rates of bullying perpetration and homophobic teasing were associated with becoming increasingly popular as a friend. However, the effects were not linear, and individuals with the highest rates of bullying perpetration and homophobic teasing were less likely to receive friendship nominations. There was no evidence that bullying perpetration or homophobic teasing were associated with the number of friendship nominations made. Further, there was a preference for individuals to form or maintain friendships with peers who engaged in similar rates of homophobic name-calling; however, this effect was not found for bullying perpetration. Additionally, changes in individual rates of bullying perpetration were not found to be predicted by the bullying perpetration of their friends; however, changes in adolescent homophobic teasing were predicted by the homophobic teasing behaviors of their friends. In a competing model that combined bullying perpetration and homophobic teasing, we found no evidence that these behaviors were associated with popularity. These findings are likely due to the high association between bullying perpetration and homophobic teasing combined with the small sample size. However, friendship selection was based on homophobic name-calling, such that, there was a preference to befriend individuals with similar rates of homophobic teasing. We also examined several risk factors (dominance, traditional masculinity, impulsivity, femininity, positive attitudes of bullying, and neighborhood violence), although, impulsivity was the only covariate that was associated with higher levels of bullying perpetration and homophobic teasing. More specifically, youth with higher rates of impulsivity engaged in higher rates of bullying perpetration and homophobic teasing over time. The findings suggest bullying perpetration and homophobic teasing have important influences on friendship formation, and close friendships influence youth’s engagement in homophobic teasing. Implications for prevention and intervention efforts are discussed in terms of targeting peer groups and popular peers to help reduce rates of these aggressive behaviors.
KeywordsBullying perpetration Homophobic teasing Peer groups Social networks
G.M. helped conceive the study and participated in the design, drafting, and editing of the manuscript; K.H. helped conceive the study, assisted with data analysis and drafting of the manuscript; D.E. assisted with drafting and editing the manuscript; B.E. assisted with data analysis; J.T. assisted with drafting and editing the manuscript; M.H. assisted with drafting the manuscript; H.G. helped conceive the study and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data Sharing Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
This study was funded by NIDA R01DA033280-01 (PI: Harold D. Green), and grant number 2011-90948-IL-IJ from the National Institute of Justice (PI: Dorothy L. Espelage).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- American Educational Research Association. (2013). Prevention of bullying in schools, colleges, and universities: Research report and recommendations. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Understanding bullying fact sheet. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/bullying_factsheet.pdf.
- Cook-Craig, P. G., Coker, A. L., Clear, E. R., Garcia, L. S., Bush, H. M., Brancato, C. J., & Fisher, B. S. (2014). Challenge and opportunity in evaluating a diffusion-based active bystanding prevention program: Green dot in high schools. Violence Against Women, 20(10), 1179–1202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development 66(3), 710–722.Google Scholar
- Duncan, N. (2006). Girls’ violence and aggression against other girls: femininity and bullying in UK schools. Combating Gender Violence in and Around Schools, 51–60.Google Scholar
- Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(2–3), 123–142.Google Scholar
- Espelage, D. L., Holt, M. K., & Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer–group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74(1), 205–220.Google Scholar
- Espelage, D. L., & Horne, A. M. (2008). School violence and bullying prevention: From research-based explanations to empirically based solutions. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 588–598). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Espelage, D. L., Hong, S. J., Merrin, G. J., Davis, J. P., Rose, C. A., & Little, T. D. (2017). A longitudinal examination of homophobic name-calling in middle school: Bullying, traditional masculinity, and sexual harassment as predictors. Psychology of Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000083.
- Espelage, D. L., & Stein, N. D. (2007). The University of Illinois and Wellesley College: Student Behavior Survey. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
- Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2011). Bullying as a predictor of offending, violence and later life outcomes. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 90–98.Google Scholar
- Foshee, V. A., Benefield, T. S., Reyes, M., Luz, H., Eastman, M., Vivolo‐Kantor, A. M., & Faris, R. (2016). Examining explanations for the link between bullying perpetration and physical dating violence perpetration: Do they vary by bullying victimization?. Aggressive Behavior, 42(1), 66–81.Google Scholar
- Haas, A. P., Eliason, M., Mays, V. M., Mathy, R. M., Cochran, S. D., D'Augelli, A. R., & Brown, G. K. (2010). Suicide and suicide risk in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: Review and recommendations. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(1), 10–51.Google Scholar
- Halpern, J., Jutte, D., Colby, J., & Boyce, W. T. (2015). Social dominance, school bullying, and child health: What are our ethical obligations to the very. Pediatrics, 135, S24 - S30.Google Scholar
- Kosciw, J. G., & Diaz, E. M. (2006). The 2005 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York: Gay. Lesbian & Straight Education Network. Accessed 23 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
- Merrin, G. J., Espelage, D. L., & Hong, J. S. (2016). Applying the social-ecological framework to understand the associations of bullying perpetration among high school students: A multilevel analysis. Psychology of Violence. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/vio0000084.
- O’Connell, A. A., & McCoach, D. B. (Eds.) (2008). Multilevel modeling of educational data. Charlotte, NC: IAP.Google Scholar
- Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school. In Aggressive Behavior (pp. 97–130). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
- Richters, J. E., & Martinez, P. (1990). Things I have seen and heard: A structured interview for assessing young children’s violence exposure. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
- Ripley, R., Snijders, T. A. B., Boda, Z., Voros, A., & Preciado, P. (2016). Manual for RSiena. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/siena/RSiena_Manual.pdf.
- Robers, S., Kemp, J., & Truman, J. (2013). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2012. NCES 2013-036/NCJ 241446. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Robinson, J., & Espelage, D. L. (2013). Peer victimization and sexual risk differences between LGBTQ and heterosexual youth in grades 7-12. American Journal of Public Health, 103(10), 1810–1819.Google Scholar
- Shetgiri, R., Lin, H., & Flores, G. (2013). Trends in risk and protective factors for child bullying perpetration in the United States. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44(1), 89–104.Google Scholar
- Smith, P. K. (2014). Understanding school bullying: Its nature and prevention strategies. Los Angeles CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., & Schweinberger, M. (2007). Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In K. Van Montfort, H. Oud & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 41–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Takizawa, R., Maughan, B., & Arseneault, L. (2014). Adult health outcomes of childhood bullying victimization: evidence from a five-decade longitudinal British birth cohort. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(7), 777–784.Google Scholar
- Tucker, J. S., Ewing, B. A., Espelage, D. L., Green, H. D., De La Haye, K., & Pollard, M. S. (2016). Longitudinal associations of homophobic name-calling victimization with psychological distress and alcohol use during adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59(1), 110–115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Vaughn, B. E., Vollenweider, M., Bost, K. K., Azria-Evans, M. R., & Snider, J. B. (2003). Negative interactions and social competence for preschool children in two samples: Reconsidering the interpretation of aggressive behavior for young children,”. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 245–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wienke Totura, C. M., MacKinnon-Lewis, C., Gesten, E. L., Gadd, R., Divine, K. P., Dunham, S., & Kamboukos, D. (2009). Bullying and victimization among boys and girls in middle school: The influence of perceived family and school contexts. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(4), 571–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar