Teacher Support, Peer Acceptance, and Engagement in the Classroom: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in Late Childhood

  • Tessa Weyns
  • Hilde Colpin
  • Steven De Laet
  • Maaike Engels
  • Karine Verschueren
Empirical Research
  • 189 Downloads

Abstract

Although research has examined the bivariate effects of teacher support, peer acceptance, and engagement, it remains unclear how these key classroom experiences evolve together, especially in late childhood. This study aims to provide a detailed picture of their transactional relations in late childhood. A sample of 586 children (M age  = 9.26 years, 47.1% boys) was followed from fourth to sixth grade. Teacher support and engagement were student-reported and peer acceptance was peer-reported. Autoregressive cross-lagged models revealed unique longitudinal effects of both peer acceptance and teacher support on engagement, and of peer acceptance on teacher support. No reverse effects of engagement on peer acceptance or teacher support were found. The study underscores the importance of examining the relative contribution of several social actors in the classroom. Regarding interventions, improving both peer acceptance and teacher support can increase children’s engagement, and augmenting peer acceptance can help to increase teacher support.

Keywords

Teacher support Peer acceptance Engagement Late childhood 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

T.W. conceived the study, performed the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript; H.C. conceived the study and helped to draft the manuscript; S.D.L. assisted with the interpretation of the data and gave feedback on the manuscript; M.E. assisted with the critical reading and gave feedback on the manuscript; K.V. conceived the study and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by two grants from the Research Foundation—Flanders (1S13917N, G.0728.14N).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

This study is in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards and was approved by the ethical review board of the faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.

Informed Consent

Active parental informed consent was obtained annually for all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J.-S., & Pagani, L. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 651–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bierman, K. L. (2011). The promise and potential of studying the “invisible hand” of teacher influence on peer relations and student outcomes: A commentary. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 297–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Separation, anxiety and anger (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Buhs, E. S. (2005). Peer rejection, negative peer treatment, and school adjustment: Self-concept and classroom engagement as mediating processes. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 407–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. (1987). The development of companionship and intimacy. Child Development, 58, 1101–1113Google Scholar
  7. Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the friendship qualities scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 471–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camarena, P. M., Sarigiani, P. A., & Peterson, A. C. (1990). Genderspecific pathways to intimacy in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 19–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Development: Vol. 23. Self-processes in development (pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Crockett, L., Losoff, M., & Peterson, A. (1984). Perceptions of the peer group and friendship in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 4, 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Laet, S., Colpin, H., Vervoort, E., Doumen, S., Van Leeuwen, K., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2015). Developmental trajectories of children’s behavioral engagement in late elementary school: Both teachers and peers matter. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1292–1306.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. De Laet, S., Doumen, S., Vervoort, E., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2014). Transactional links between teacher–child relationship quality and perceived versus sociometric popularity: A three‐wave longitudinal study. Child Development, 85, 1647–1662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., Claes, S. et al. (2016). Behavioral engagement, peer status, and teacher–student relationships in adolescence: A longitudinal study on reciprocal influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0414-5.
  16. Evers, A., Egberink, I. J. L., Braak, M. S. L., Frima, R. M., Vermeulen, C. S. M., & van Vliet-Mulder, J. C. (2013). COTAN Documentatie [COTAN Documentation]. Amsterdam: Boom test uitgevers.Google Scholar
  17. Ewing, A. R., & Taylor, A. R. (2009). The role of child gender and ethnicity in teacher-child relationship quality and children’s behavioral adjustment in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 92–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children’s perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.6.1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gallagher, K. C., Kainz, K., Vernon-Feagans, L., & White, K. M. (2013). Development of student–teacher relationships in rural early elementary classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 520–528.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher– child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625–638.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Howes, C., Hamilton, C. E., & Matheson, C. C. (1994). Children’s relationships with peers: Differential associations with aspects of the teacher-child relationship. Child Development, 65, 253–263.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hughes, J. N. (2011). Longitudinal effects of teacher and student perceptions of teacher–student relationship qualities on academic adjustment. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 38–60.  https://doi.org/10.1086/660686.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hughes, J. N., & Chen, Q. (2011). Reciprocal effects of student–teacher and student-peer relatedness: Effects on academic self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 278–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.03.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hughes, J. N., & Kwok, O. M. (2006). Classroom engagement mediates the effect of teacher–student support on elementary students’ peer acceptance: A prospective analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 465–480.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O. M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 1–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Hughes, J. N., & Villarreal, V. (2008). Teacher, student, and peer reports of teacher-student relationship support: Joint and unique contributions to academic and social adjustment. Paper presented at the 30th ISPA International Conference, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Hughes, J. N., Zhang, D., & Hill, C. R. (2006). Peer assessments of normative and individual teacher–student support predict social acceptance and engagement among low-achieving children. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 447–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.10.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Jelicic, H., Phelps, E., & Lerner, R. A. (2009). Use of missing data methods in longitudinal studies: The persistence of bad practices in developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1195–1199.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jerome, E., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2009). Teacher–child relationships from kindergarten to sixth grade: Early childhood predictors of teacher-perceived conflict and closeness. Social Development, 18, 915–945.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00508.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika, 57, 239–251.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.2.239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1997). Classroom peer acceptance, friendship, and victimization: Destinct relation systems that contribute uniquely to children's school adjustment? Child Development, 68, 1181–1197.Google Scholar
  35. LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lam, S.-F., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Nelson, B., et al. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 77–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Leflot, G., Van Lier, P. A. C., Verschueren, K., Onghena, P., & Colpin, H. (2011). Transactional associations among teacher support, peer social preference, and child externalizing behavior: A four-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 87–99.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.533409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Li, Y., Hughes, J. N., Kwok, O., & Hsu, H. (2012). Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of child, teacher, and peer reports of teacher-student support. Psychological Assessment, 24, 54–65.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024481.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
  40. Meehan, B. T., Hughes, J. N., & Cavell, T. A. (2003). Teacher–student relationships as compensatory resources for aggressive children. Child Development, 74, 1145–1157.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mercer, S. H., & DeRosier, M. E. (2008). Teacher preference, peer rejection, and student aggression: A prospective study of transactional influence and independent contributions to emotional adjustment and grades. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 661–685.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  43. Putallaz, M. (1983). Predicting children’s sociometric status from their behavior. Child Development, 54, 1417–1426. 10.2307/1129804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement a meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493–529.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793.Google Scholar
  45. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Children in Peer Groups. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 4 (pp. 1–48). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy405.Google Scholar
  46. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N. Eisenberg, (Ed.), W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 571–645). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher–child relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smits, J. A. E., & Vorst, H. C. M. (1990). Schoolvragenlijst voor basisonderwijs en voortgezet onderwijs: SVL. Handleiding voor gebruikers. Nijmegen: Berkhout. [School questionnaire for elementary and secondary school. User’s manual].Google Scholar
  50. Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M., & Jak, S. (2012). Are boys better off with male and girls with female teachers? A multilevel investigation of measurement invariance and gender match in teacher–student relationship quality. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 363–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Troop-Gordon, W., & Asher, S. R. (2005). Modifications in children’s goals when encountering obstacles to conflict resolution. Child Development, 76, 568–582.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00864.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83, 877–895.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wellborn, J., Connell, J., Skinner, E., & Pierson, L. (1992). Teacher as social context (TASC). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  55. Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, R. L. (2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645–646.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00645.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tessa Weyns
    • 1
  • Hilde Colpin
    • 1
  • Steven De Laet
    • 2
  • Maaike Engels
    • 1
  • Karine Verschueren
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.VCLB-Koepel—Organization of Centers for Student GuidanceSchaarbeekBelgium

Personalised recommendations