Co-Brooding and Co-Reflection as Differential Predictors of Depressive Symptoms and Friendship Quality in Adolescents: Investigating the Moderating Role of Gender
Co-rumination has been shown advantageous for friendship quality, but disadvantageous for mental health. Recently, two components have been distinguished, with co-brooding predicting increases in depressive symptoms and co-reflection decreases. The current study aimed to replicate these findings and investigated whether both components also show differential relations with friendship quality. Gender was investigated as a moderator. Path analyses were used on data of 313 adolescents aged 9–17 (50.5% girls). Co-brooding was related to more concurrent and prospective depressive symptoms in girls. Co-reflection predicted less concurrent and prospective depressive symptoms in girls and higher concurrent positive friendship quality for boys and girls. This study underscores the value of studying co-rumination components and suggests that boys and girls in this context differ in their pathways towards depression.
KeywordsCo-brooding Co-reflection Co-rumination Depressive symptoms Friendship quality Adolescence
The authors thank Katrien De Jonghe, Elien Geerdens, Kimberly Paulussen, Femke Van Vlierberghe, Kirsten Verhuizen, and Lesley Wouters for their help in the data collection. This study was funded by Research Foundation—Flanders (Grant G.0923.12 to Patricia Bijttebier and PhD fellowship to Margot Bastin). Filip Raes is supported by the KU Leuven Centre of Excellence on Generalization Research (GRIP*TT; PF/10/005).
M.B. conceived and designed the study, collected the data, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the data, and took the lead in writing up the manuscript. J.V. participated in drafting the manuscript, assisted in data analyses and interpretation, and critically revised the manuscript. F.R. participated in the conception and design of the study and critically revised the manuscript. P.B. participated in the conception and design of the study, participated in drafting the manuscript, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval was obtained from the local research Ethics Committee (S-number 55360).
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Abela, J. R. Z., Brozina, K., & Haigh, E. P. (2002). An examination of the response styles theory of depression in third– and seventh–grade children: A short–term longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019873015594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bastin, M., Mezulis, A. H., Ahles, J., Raes, F., & Bijttebier, P. (2015). Moderating effects of brooding and Co-rumination on the relationship between stress and depressive symptoms in early adolescence: A multi-wave study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9912-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre-adolescence and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the friendship qualities scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407594113011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Calmes, C. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2008). Rumination in interpersonal relationships: Does co-rumination explain gender differences in emotional distress and relationship satisfaction among college students? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-008-9200-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cole, D. A., Tram, J. M., Martin, J. M., Hoffman, K. B., Ruiz, M. D., Jacquez, F. M., & Maschman, T. L. (2002). Individual differences in the emergence of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: A longitudinal investigation of parent and child reports. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843X.111.1.156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dam, A., Roelofs, J., & Muris, P. (2013). Correlates of co-rumination in non-clinical adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9711-0.
- Hankin, B. L., Stone, L., & Wright, P. A. (2010). Corumination, interpersonal stress generation, and internalizing symptoms: Accumulating effects and transactional influences in a multiwave study of adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409990368.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kovacs, M. (2003). Children’s depression inventory: Technical manual. New York: Multi-health Systems.Google Scholar
- Parker, J. G., Rubin, K. H., Erath, S. A., Wojslawowicz, J. C., & Buskirk, A. A. (2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (pp. 419–493). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Raes, F., Griffith, J. W., Van der Gucht, K., & Williams, J. M. G. (2014). School-based prevention and reduction of depression in adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mindfulness group program. Mindfulness, 5, 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0202-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rose, A. J., Carlson, W., & Waller, E. M. (2007). Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment: Considering the socioemotional trade-offs of co-rumination. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2069.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rose, A. J., Schwartz-Mette, R. A., Glick, G. C., & Smith, R. L. (2013). Co-Rumination and positive friendship quality: The role of receiving relationship provisions. In J. Felton (Chair), Investigations into the causes and consequences of co-rumination: The good, the bad, and the sad. Symposium conducted at the 2013 Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Seattle, USA.Google Scholar
- Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 619–700). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sarin, S., Abela, J. R. Z., & Auerbach, R. P. (2005). The response styles theory of depression: A test of specificity and causal mediation. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000463.
- Schoofs, H., Hermans, D., & Raes, F. (2010). Brooding and reflection as subtypes of rumination: Evidence from confirmatory factor analysis in nonclinical samples using the Dutch ruminative response scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 609–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-010-9182-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach for preventing relapse. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar