Neighborhood, Family, and Peer Factors Associated with Early Adolescent Smoking and Alcohol Use
- 1.8k Downloads
There is broad agreement that neighborhood contexts are important for adolescent development, but there is less consensus about their association with adolescent smoking and alcohol use. Few studies have examined associations between neighborhood socioeconomic contexts and smoking and alcohol use while also accounting for differences in family and peer risk factors for substance use. Data drawn from the Seattle Social Development Project (N = 808), a gender-balanced (female = 49%), multiethnic, theory-driven longitudinal study originating in Seattle, WA, were used to estimate trajectories of smoking and alcohol use from 5th to 9th grade. Time-varying measures of neighborhood socioeconomic, family, and peer factors were associated with smoking and alcohol use at each wave after accounting for average growth in smoking and alcohol use over time and demographic differences. Results indicated that living in more socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods, lower family income, lower family general functioning, more permissive family smoking environments, and affiliation with deviant peers were independently associated with increased smoking. Lower family functioning, more permissive family alcohol use environments, and deviant peers were independently associated with increased alcohol use. The effect of neighborhood disadvantage on smoking was mediated by family income and deviant peers while the effect of neighborhood disadvantage on alcohol use was mediated by deviant peers alone. Family functioning and family substance use did not mediate associations between neighborhood disadvantage and smoking or alcohol use. The results highlight the importance of neighborhood, family, and peer factors in early adolescent smoking and alcohol use. Future studies should examine the unique association of neighborhood disadvantage with adolescent smoking net of family socioeconomics, functioning, and substance use, as well as peer affiliations. Better understanding of the role of contextual factors in early adolescent smoking and alcohol use can help bolster efforts to prevent both short and long harms from substance use.
KeywordsNeighborhood disadvantage Early onset smoking Early onset alcohol use Adolescent development Latent growth curve
Data collection for this study was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (5R01DA003721 and 5R01DA033956). Support was provided a National Poverty Research Center Dissertation Fellowship awarded by the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin–Madison with funding from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Cooperative Agreement number AE00103. Support was provided by a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development research infrastructure grant, No. R24HD042828; and training grant No. T32HD007543 to the Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology at the University of Washington. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policy of any agency of the Federal government.
C.C. conceived of the study design, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript; R.K. participated in the data interpretation and helped draft the manuscript; R.C. participated in data interpretation and helped draft the manuscript; K.G. participated in the statistical analyses, data interpretation, and helped draft the manuscript; J.H. participated in data interpretation and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
R.F. Catalano is on the board of Channing Bete Company, distributer of prevention programs. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Washington and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Allard, S. W. (2017). Places in need: The changing geography of poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Multiple imputation with Mplus. MPlus Web Notes.Google Scholar
- Bailey, J., Samek, D., Keyes, M., Hill, K., Hicks, B., & McGue, M., et al. (2014). General and substance-specific predictors of young adult nicotine dependence, alcohol use disorder, and problem behavior: Replication in two samples. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 138, 161–168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Bailey, J. A., Hill, K. G., Meacham, M. C., Young, S. E., & Hawkins, J. D. (2011). Strategies for characterizing complex phenotypes and environments: General and specific family environmental predictors of young adult tobacco dependence, alcohol use disorder, and co-occurring problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 118(2), 444–451.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Brody, G. H., Conger, R., Gibbons, F. X., Ge, X., McBride Murry, V., Gerrard, M., & Simons, R. L. (2001). The influence of neighborhood disadvantage, collective socialization, and parenting on African American children’s affiliation with deviant peers. Child Development, 72(4), 1231–1246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cambron, C., Guttmannova, K., & Fleming, C. B. (2017). State and national contexts in evaluating cannabis laws: A case study of Washington State. Journal of Drug Issues, 47(1), 74–90.Google Scholar
- Catalano, R. E., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control Prevention. (2008). Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000–2004. MMWR, 57(45), 1226.Google Scholar
- Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., de Looze, M., & Roberts, C., et al. (2009). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study, 2010, 271.Google Scholar
- Devenish, B., Hooley, M., & Mellor, D. (2017). The pathways between socioeconomic status and adolescent outcomes: A systematic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(1–2), 219–238.Google Scholar
- Elliott, D. S., Menard, S., Rankin, B., Elliott, A., Wilson, W. J., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Good kids from bad neighborhoods: Successful development in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Guttmannova, K., Bailey, J. A., Hill, K. G., Lee, J. O., Hawkins, J. D., Woods, M. L., & Catalano, R. F. (2011). Sensitive periods for adolescent alcohol use initiation: Predicting the lifetime occurrence and chronicity of alcohol problems in adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(2), 221–231.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Morrison, D. M., O’Donnell, J., Abbott, R. D., & Day, L. E. (1992b). The Seattle social development project: Effects of the first four years on protective factors and problem behaviors. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 139–161). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hoffmann, J. P., & Johnson, R. A. (1998). A national portrait of family structure and adolescent drug use. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(3), 633–645.Google Scholar
- Ingoldsby, E. M., Shaw, D. S., Winslow, E., Schonberg, M., Gilliom, M., & Criss, M. M. (2006). Neighborhood disadvantage, parent–child conflict, neighborhood peer relationships, and early antisocial behavior problem trajectories. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(3), 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. Inner-city Poverty in the United States, 111, 186.Google Scholar
- Jenson, J. M., & Bender, K. (2014). Preventing child and adolescent problem behavior: Evidence-based strategies in schools, families, and communities. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
- Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2010. Volume I, Secondary School Students. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Mathur, C., Erickson, D. J., Stigler, M. H., Forster, J. L., & Finnegan, Jr, J. R. (2013). Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status effects on adolescent smoking: A multilevel cohort-sequential latent growth analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 103(3), 543–548.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus Version 7 user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Oxford, M. L., Harachi, T. W., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Preadolescent predictors of substance initiation: A test of both the direct and mediated effect of family social control factors on deviant peer associations and substance initiation. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27(4), 599–616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478.Google Scholar
- Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Spoth, R., Reyes, M. L., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (1999). Assessing a public health approach to delay onset and progression of adolescent substance use: latent transition and log-linear analyses of longitudinal family preventive intervention outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 619.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Surgeon General. (2016). Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on alcohol, drugs, and health. Washington DC: Author. Retrieved from https://addiction.surgeongeneral.gov/surgeon-generals-report.pdf
- Van Ryzin, M. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). Engaging parents in the family check-up in middle school: Longitudinal effects on family conflict and problem behavior through the high school transition. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(6), 627–633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Wilson, W. (1987). Truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy.Google Scholar