Are Associations Between “Sexist” Video Games and Decreased Empathy Toward Women Robust? A Reanalysis of Gabbiadini et al. 2016

Empirical Research

Abstract

Gabbiadini, A., Riva, P., Andrighetto, L., Volpato, C., & Bushman, B, (PloS ONE, 2016) provided evidence for a connection between “sexist” video games and decreased empathy toward girls using an experimental paradigm. These claims are based on a moderated mediation model. They reported a three-way interaction between game condition, gender, and avatar identification when predicting masculine ideology in their original study. Masculine ideology was associated, in turn, with decreased empathy. However, there were no main experimental effects for video game condition on empathy. The current analysis considers the strength of the evidence for claims made in the original study on a sample of 153 adolescents (Mage = 16.812, SD = 1.241; 44.2% male). We confirmed that there was little evidence for an overall effect of game condition on empathy toward girls or women. We tested the robustness of the original reported moderated mediation models against other, theoretically derived alternatives, and found that effects differed based on how variables were measured (using alternatives in their public data file) and the statistical model used. The experimental groups differed significantly and substantially in terms of age suggesting that there might have been issues with the procedures used to randomly assign participants to conditions. These results highlight the need for preregistration of experimental protocols in video game research and raise some concerns about how moderated mediation models are used to support causal inferences. These results call into question whether use of “sexist” video games is a causal factor in the development of reduced empathy toward girls and women among adolescents.

Keywords

Video games Empathy Sexism Violence Masculinity 

References

  1. Adachi, P. C., Hodson, G., Willoughby, T., Blank, C., & Ha, A. (2016). From outgroups to allied forces: Effect of intergroup cooperation in violent and nonviolent video games on boosting favorable outgroup attitudes. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(3), 259–265. doi:10.1037/xge0000145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adachi, P. C., & Willoughby, T. (2011). The effect of violent video games on aggression: Is it more than just the violence? Aggression And Violent Behavior, 16(1), 55–62. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adachi, P. C., & Willoughby, T. (2013). Do video games promote positive youth development? Journal Of Adolescent Research, 28(2), 155–165. doi:10.1177/0743558412464522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. A., & Murphy, C. R. (2003). Violent video games and aggressive behavior in young women. Aggressive Behavior, 29(5), 423–429. doi:10.1002/ab.10042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barone, M. J., Shimp, T. A., & Sprott, D. E. (1997). Mere ownership revisited: A robust effect? Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 6(3), 257–284. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0603_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boot, W., Blakely, D., & Simons, D. (2011). Do action video games improve perception and cognition? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 226 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowman, N. D. (2016). The rise (and refinement) of moral panic. In R. Kowert, & T. Quandt (Eds.), The video game debate: Unraveling the physical, social, and psychological effects of digital games (pp. 22–38). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Breuer, J., Kowert, R., Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2015). Sexist games=Sexist gamers? A longitudinal study on the relationship between video game use and sexist attitudes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 197–202. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham, S., Engelstatter, B., & Ward, M. R. (2016). Violent video games and violent crime. Southern Economic Journal, 82(4), 1247–1265.Google Scholar
  10. Elson, M., Mohseni, M. R., Breuer, J., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T. (2014). Press CRTT to measure aggressive behavior: The unstandardized use of the competitive reaction time task in aggression research. Psychological Assessment, 26, 419–432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Espelage, D. L., Mebane, S. E., & Adams, M. R. (2004). Empathy, caring, and bullying: Toward an understanding of complex associations. In D. L. Espelage, S. M. Swearer (Eds.). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective in prevention and intervention (pp. 37–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Ferguson, C. J. (2015a). Do angry birds make for angry children? A meta-analysis of video game Influences on children’s and adolescents’ aggression, mental health, prosocial behavior and academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 646–666.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferguson, C. J. (2015b). “Everybody knows psychology is not a real science”: Public perceptions of psychology and how we can improve our relationship with policymakers, the scientific community, and the general public. American Psychologist, 70, 527–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferguson, C. J., Rueda, S. M., Cruz, A. M., Ferguson, D. E., Fritz, S., & Smith, S. M. (2008). Violent video games and aggression: Causal relationship or byproduct of family violence and intrinsic violence motivation? Criminal Justice And Behavior, 35(3), 311–332. doi:10.1177/0093854807311719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frodi, A. M., & Smetana, J. (1984). Abused, neglected, and nonmaltreated preschoolers’ ability to discriminate emotions in others: The effects of IQ. Child Abuse & Neglect, 8(4), 459–465. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(84)90027-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Furuya-Kanamori, L., & Doi, S. R. (2016). Angry birds, angry children, and angry meta-analysts: A reanalysis. Perspectives On Psychological Science, 11(3), 408–414. doi:10.1177/1745691616635599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gabbiadini, A., Riva, P., Andrighetto, L., Volpato,C., & Bushman, B. (2016). Acting like a tough guy: Violent-sexist video Games, identification With game characters, masculine beliefs, & empathy for female violence victims. PloS One. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0152121.
  18. Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The statistical crisis in science. American Scientist, 102, 460–465.Google Scholar
  19. Grizzard, M., Tamborini, R., Lewis, R. J., Wang, L., & Prabhu, S. (2014). Being bad in a video game can make us morally sensitive. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking, 17(8), 499–504. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(5), 441–476. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2003.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Journal of Media Psychology (2016). Technology and human behavior: A preregistered special issue of the Journal of Media Psychology. http://www.icahdq.org/pubs/calls/JournalOfMedia.asp.Google Scholar
  23. Furuya-Kanamori, F., & Doi, S. (2016). Angry birds, angry children and angry meta-analysts. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 408–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kardefelt-Winther, D. (2015). A critical account of DSM-5 criteria for internet gaming disorder. Addiction Research & Theory, 23(2), 93–98. doi:10.3109/16066359.2014.935350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knafo, A., Zahn-Waxler, C., Van Hulle, C., Robinson, J. L., & Rhee, S. H. (2008). The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: Genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion, 8(6), 737–752. doi:10.1037/a0014179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Konijn, E. A., Nije Bijvank, M., & Bushman, B. J. (2007). I wish I were a warrior: The role of wishful identification in the effects of violent video games on aggression in adolescent boys. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1038–1044. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Levant, R. F., Rankin, T. J., Williams, C. M., Hasan, N. T., & Smalley, K. B. (2010). Evaluation of the factor structure and construct validity of scores on the Male role norms inventory—Revised (MRNI-R). Psychology Of Men & Masculinity, 11(1), 25–37. doi:10.1037/a0017637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Licata, M., Williams, A., & Paulus, M. (2016). The development of empathy in early childhood. In D. F. Watt, J. Panksepp, D. F. Watt, & J. Panksepp (Eds.), Psychology and neurobiology of empathy (pp. 111–148). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Biomedical Books.Google Scholar
  29. Markey, P. M. (2015). Finding the middle ground in violent video game research: Lessons from Ferguson (2015). Perspectives On Psychological Science, 10(5), 667–670. doi:10.1177/1745691615592236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Markey, P. M., Males, M. A., French, J. E., & Markey, C. N. (2015a). Lessons from Markey et al. (2015) and Bushman et al. (2015): Sensationalism and integrity in media research. Human Communication Research, 41(2), 184–203. doi:10.1111/hcre.12057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Markey, P. M., Markey, C. N., & French, J. E. (2015b). Violent video games and real-world violence: Rhetoric versus data. Psychology Of Popular Media Culture, 4(4), 277–295. doi:10.1037/ppm0000030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives On Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. doi:10.1177/1745691612459058.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Przybylski, A. K., Deci, E. L., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Competence-impeding electronic games and players’ aggressive feelings, thoughts, and behaviors. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 106(3), 441–457. doi:10.1037/a0034820.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rothstein, H. R., & Bushman, B. J. (2015). Methodological and reporting errors in meta-analytic reviews make other meta-analysts angry: A commentary on Ferguson (2015). Perspectives On Psychological Science, 10(5), 677–679. doi:10.1177/1745691615592235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Savacool, J. (2014). Think you’re immune to video-game violence? Think again. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/gaming/2014/03/30/video-games-violence/6437253/.
  36. Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Singal, J. (2016). Here’s an overhyped study about video-game violence and misogyny. New York Magazine. http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/04/here-s-an-overhyped-study-about-video-game-violence-and-misogyny.html.
  39. Stermer, S. P., & Burkley, M. (2015). SeX-Box: Exposure to sexist video games predicts benevolent sexism. Psychology Of Popular Media Culture, 4(1), 47–55. doi:10.1037/a0028397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Surette, R. (2013). Cause or catalyst: The interaction of real world and media crime models. American Journal Of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 392–409. doi:10.1007/s12103-012-9177-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Swami, V., Coles, R., Wilson, E., Salem, N., Wyrozumska, K., & Furnham, A. (2010). Oppressive beliefs at play: Associations among beauty ideals and practices and individual differences in sexism, objectification of others, and media exposure. Psychology Of Women Quarterly, 34(3), 365–379. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01582.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Looy, J., Courtois, C., De Vocht, M., & De Marez, L. (2012). Player identification in online games: Validation of a scale for measuring identification in MMOGs. Media Psychology, 15(2), 197–221. doi:10.1080/15213269.2012.674917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). The limited informativeness of meta-analyses of media effects. Perspectives On Psychological Science, 10(5), 680–682. doi:10.1177/1745691615592237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 632–638.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Williford, A., Boulton, A. J., Forrest-Bank, S. S., Bender, K. A., Dieterich, W. A., & Jenson, J. M. (2016). The effect of bullying and victimization on cognitive empathy development during the transition to middle school. Child & Youth Care Forum, 45(4), 525–541. doi:10.1007/s10566-015-9343-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wittek, C. T., Finserås, T. R., Pallesen, S., Mentzoni, R. A., Hanss, D., Griffiths, M. D., & Molde, H. (2016). Prevalence and predictors of video game addiction: A study based on a national representative sample of gamers. International Journal Of Mental Health And Addiction, 14(5), 672–686. doi:10.1007/s11469-015-9592-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStetson UniversityDeLandUSA
  2. 2.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations