The Longitudinal Association of Relationship Quality and Reoffending Among First-Time Juvenile Offenders and Their Mothers
To understand how youth desist from crime after their first arrest, it is necessary to investigate their primary support system: their parents. As such, this study examined the reciprocal effects of justice system contact on the mother–child dyad. Interviews with 317 mothers and their sons from Orange County, CA, Jefferson Parish, LA, and Philadelphia, PA were conducted semiannually over two and a half years. At the beginning of the study, the sons were first-time offenders aged 13–17 and mostly non-White (i.e., 19.2 White, 56.5 Latino, 21.5 Black, and 2.8% another race/ethnicity). The results revealed that a high quality initial mother–son relationship reduces youths’ re-offending over time. Furthermore, as mothers perceived that their sons were offending more, they reported less warmth in their relationships with their sons two and a half years later. Interestingly, youth’s age emerged as a moderator. First, older youth were less likely to engage in reoffending if they had a warm maternal relationship. Second, decreases in relationship warmth associated with re-offending were steeper for younger youth. The findings have implications for juvenile justice policy in terms of improving probationary outcomes for youth offenders, and alleviating the financial and emotional burden on justice system-involved families.
KeywordsAdolescent development Parent–child relationship Juvenile delinquency
We are grateful to the many individuals responsible for the data collection and preparation.
The Crossroads Study is supported by funding from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. The Crossroads Mothers Study is supported by UC MEXUS and the American Psychology-Law Society.
C.C. conceived of the ancillary Crossroads Mothers study, and led its design and coordination. C.C. also performed the statistical analyses relevant to the present manuscript, and drafted the manuscript. E.C. conceived of the main Crossroads study, and led its design and coordination. E.C. also aided in the interpretation of the data after analyses were completed, and helped to draft the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) each of the three study sites: the University of California, Irvine, Temple University, and the University of New Orleans.
Informed consent was obtained for all adult study participants. For study participants who were minors at study enrollment, both youth assent and parental consent were obtained.
- Collins, W. A., & Laursen, B. (2004). Parent–adolescent relationships and influences. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 331–362). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Corrado, R. R., McCuish, E. C., Hart, S. D., & DeLisi, M. (2015). The role of psychopathic traits and developmental risk factors on offending trajectories from early adolescence to adulthood: A prospective study of incarcerated youth. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 357–368. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feierman, J., Goldstein, N., Haney-Caron, E., & Columbo, J. F. (2016). Debtor prison for kids? The high cost of fines and fees in the juvenile justice system. Juvenile Law Center. Retrieved from http://debtorsprison.jlc.org/documents/JLC-Debtors-Prison.pdf.
- Guimond, F. A., Laursen, B., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Dionne, G., & Boivin, M. (2016). Associations between mother–child relationship quality and adolescent adjustment: Using a genetically controlled design to determine the direction and magnitude of effects. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40, 196–204. doi: 10.1177/0165025415620059.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Harkness, J. A., Van de Vijver, F. J., & Mohler, P. P. (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Jones, B. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2012). A Stata plugin for estimating group-based trajectory models. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
- Kwon, J. A., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2014). Linking family economic pressure and supportive parenting to adolescent health behaviors: Two developmental pathways leading to health promoting and health risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1176–1190. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0060-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049–1065. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01588.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (2009). Parent–child relationships during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 3–32). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Age-crime curve. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 12–18). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Loeber, R., Hipwell, A. E., Pardini, D. P., Stepp, S. D., & Ahonen, L. (2015). Constancy and change in the prevalence and frequency of offending when based on longitudinal self reports or official records: Comparisons by gender, race, and crime type. Journal of Developmental and Life Course Criminology, 1, 150–168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Loeber, R., Jennings, W. G., Ahonen, L., Piquero, A. R., & Farrington, D. P. (2017). Gender differences: Comparisons with males in the Pittsburgh youth study. In R. Loeber, W. G. Jennings, L. Ahonen, A. R. Piquero, & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Female delinquency from childhood to young adulthood: Recent results from the Pittsburgh Girls Study (pp. 29–35). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Michelson, D., Ben-Zion, I., James, A. I., Draper, L., Penney, C., & Day, C. (2014). ‘Living with Teenagers’: Feasibility study of a peer-led parenting intervention for socially disadvantaged families with adolescent children. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 99, 731–737. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mulford, C. F., Blachman-Demner, D. R., Pitzer, L., Schubert, C. A., Piquero, A. R., & Mulvey, E. P. (2016). Victim offender overlap: Dual trajectory examination of victimization and offending among young felony offenders over seven years. Victims & Offenders, 1–27. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2016.1196283
- Murray, K. W., Dwyer, K. M., Rubin, K. H., Knighton-Wisor, S., & Booth-LaForce, C. (2014). Parent–child relationships, parental psychological control, and aggression: Maternal and paternal relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1361–1373. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0019-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) (2015) OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book. Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/crime/qa05101.asp?qaDate=2014
- Pastorelli, C., Lansford, J. E., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Malone, P. S., Di Giunta, L., Bacchini, D., Bombi, A. S., Zelli, A., Miranda, M. C., Bornstein, M. H., Tapanya, S., Tirado, L. M. U., Alampay, L. P., Al-Hassan, S. M., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A., Oburu, P., Skinner, A. T., & Sorbring, E. (2015). Positive parenting and children’s prosocial behavior in eight countries. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 824–834. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perris, C., Arindell, W. A., & Eisemann, M. (1994). Parenting and psychopathology. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ray, J. V., Frick, P. J., Thornton, L. C., Wall Myers, T. D., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2016). Callous–unemotional traits predict self-reported offending in adolescent boys: The mediating role of delinquent peers and the moderating role of parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 53, 319–328. doi: 10.1037/dev0000210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rozzell, L. (2013). The role of family engagement in creating trauma-informed juvenile justice systems. National Center for Child Traumatic Stress. Retrieved from http://www.nctsn.org/sites/default/files/assets/pdfs/jj_trauma_brief_familyengagement_rozzelll_final.pdf.
- Russell, M. A., & Odgers, C. L. (2016). Desistance and life-course persistence: Findings from longitudinal studies using group-based trajectory modeling of antisocial behavior. In K. Heilbrun, D. DeMatteo, E. S. & Goldstein Naomi (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 159–175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/14643-008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simons, L. G., Sutton, T. E., Simons, R. L., Gibbons, F. X., & Murry, V. M. (2016). Mechanisms that link parenting practices to adolescents’ risky sexual behavior: A test of six competing theories. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 255–270. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0409-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith, J. D., Knoble, N. B., Zerr, A. A., Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2014). Family check-up effects across diverse ethnic groups: Reducing early-adolescence antisocial behavior by reducing family conflict. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43, 400–414. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.888670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stallman, H. M., & Ralph, A. (2007). Reducing risk factors for adolescent behavioural and emotional problems: A pilot randomised controlled trial of a self-administered parenting intervention. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 6, 125–137.Google Scholar
- Stanton, B. F., Li, X., Galbraith, J., Cornick, G., Feigelman, S., Kaljee, L., & Zhou, Y. (2000). Parental underestimates of adolescent risk behavior: A randomized, controlled trial of a parental monitoring intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 18–26. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00022-1.
- Steinberg, L. (1990). Interdependency in the family: Autonomy, conflict, and harmony in the parent–adolescent relationship. In S. S. Feldman, & G. R. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 255–276). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Steinberg, L., Blatt‐Eisengart, I., & Cauffman, E. (2006). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful homes: A replication in a sample of serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 47–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00119.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266–1281. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01694.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walker, S. C., Bishop, A. S., Pullmann, M. D., & Bauer, G. (2015). A research framework for understanding the practical impact of family involvement in the juvenile justice system: The juvenile justice family involvement model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56, 408–421. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9755-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar