Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 46, Issue 7, pp 1533–1546 | Cite as

The Longitudinal Association of Relationship Quality and Reoffending Among First-Time Juvenile Offenders and Their Mothers

  • Caitlin CavanaghEmail author
  • Elizabeth Cauffman
Empirical Research

Abstract

To understand how youth desist from crime after their first arrest, it is necessary to investigate their primary support system: their parents. As such, this study examined the reciprocal effects of justice system contact on the mother–child dyad. Interviews with 317 mothers and their sons from Orange County, CA, Jefferson Parish, LA, and Philadelphia, PA were conducted semiannually over two and a half years. At the beginning of the study, the sons were first-time offenders aged 13–17 and mostly non-White (i.e., 19.2 White, 56.5 Latino, 21.5 Black, and 2.8% another race/ethnicity). The results revealed that a high quality initial mother–son relationship reduces youths’ re-offending over time. Furthermore, as mothers perceived that their sons were offending more, they reported less warmth in their relationships with their sons two and a half years later. Interestingly, youth’s age emerged as a moderator. First, older youth were less likely to engage in reoffending if they had a warm maternal relationship. Second, decreases in relationship warmth associated with re-offending were steeper for younger youth. The findings have implications for juvenile justice policy in terms of improving probationary outcomes for youth offenders, and alleviating the financial and emotional burden on justice system-involved families.

Keywords

Adolescent development Parent–child relationship Juvenile delinquency 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the many individuals responsible for the data collection and preparation.

Funding

The Crossroads Study is supported by funding from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. The Crossroads Mothers Study is supported by UC MEXUS and the American Psychology-Law Society.

Authors’ Contributions

C.C. conceived of the ancillary Crossroads Mothers study, and led its design and coordination. C.C. also performed the statistical analyses relevant to the present manuscript, and drafted the manuscript. E.C. conceived of the main Crossroads study, and led its design and coordination. E.C. also aided in the interpretation of the data after analyses were completed, and helped to draft the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) each of the three study sites: the University of California, Irvine, Temple University, and the University of New Orleans.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained for all adult study participants. For study participants who were minors at study enrollment, both youth assent and parental consent were obtained.

References

  1. Bush, K. R., & Peterson, G. W. (2013). Parent–child relations in diverse contexts. In G. W. Peterson, & K. R. Bush (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (3rd ed., pp. 275–302). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cauffman, E., Fine, A., Thomas, A. G., & Monahan, K. C. (2017). Trajectories of violent behavior among females and males. Child Development, 88, 41–54. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12678.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, M. A., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2010). Monetary costs of gender and ethnicity disaggregated group-based offending. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 159–172. doi: 10.1007/s12103-010-9071-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins, W. A. (1997). Relationships and development during adolescence: Interpersonal adaptation to individual change. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00126.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins, W. A., & Laursen, B. (2004). Parent–adolescent relationships and influences. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 331–362). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Conger, R., Ge, X., Elder, Jr., G., Lorenz, F., & Simons, R. (1994). Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Development, 65, 541–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00768.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Corrado, R. R., McCuish, E. C., Hart, S. D., & DeLisi, M. (2015). The role of psychopathic traits and developmental risk factors on offending trajectories from early adolescence to adulthood: A prospective study of incarcerated youth. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 357–368. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K., & Losardo, D. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 121–136. doi: 10.1080/15248371003699969.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. (2007). Collaborative and iterative translation: An alternative approach to back translation. Journal of International Marketing, 15, 30–43. doi: 10.1509/jimk.15.1.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eddy, J. M., & Chamberlain, P. (2000). Family management and deviant peer association as mediators of the impact of treatment condition on youth antisocial behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 857–863. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.857.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., & Howell, J. C. (2012). Young adult offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 11, 729–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00842.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feierman, J., Goldstein, N., Haney-Caron, E., & Columbo, J. F. (2016). Debtor prison for kids? The high cost of fines and fees in the juvenile justice system. Juvenile Law Center. Retrieved from http://debtorsprison.jlc.org/documents/JLC-Debtors-Prison.pdf.
  13. Gault-Sherman, M. (2012). It’s a two-way street: The bidirectional relationship between parenting and delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 121–145. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9656-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffin, K. W., Samuolis, J., & Williams, C. (2011). Efficacy of a self-administered home-based parent intervention on parenting behaviors for preventing adolescent substance use. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 319–325. doi: 10.1007/s10826-010-9395-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guimond, F. A., Laursen, B., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Dionne, G., & Boivin, M. (2016). Associations between mother–child relationship quality and adolescent adjustment: Using a genetically controlled design to determine the direction and magnitude of effects. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40, 196–204. doi: 10.1177/0165025415620059.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Harkness, J. A., Van de Vijver, F. J., & Mohler, P. P. (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1979). Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures. American Sociological Review, 44, 995–1014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094722. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoeve, M., Blokland, A., Dubas, J. S., Loeber, R., Gerris, J. R., & Van der Laan, P. H. (2008). Trajectories of delinquency and parenting styles. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 223–235. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9172-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Eichelsheim, V. I., van der Laan, P. H., Smeenk, W., & Gerris, J. R. (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 749–775. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9310-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Huizinga, D., Esbensen, F. A., & Weiher, A. W. (1991). Are there multiple paths to delinquency? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jennings, W. G., Loeber, R., Pardini, D., Piquero, A., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). Offending from childhood to young adulthood: Recent results from the Pittsburgh youth study. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jennings, W. G., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the number and shape of developmental/life-course violence, aggression, and delinquency trajectories: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 472–489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, B. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2012). A Stata plugin for estimating group-based trajectory models. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, B., Nagin, D., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods and Research, 29, 374–393. doi:10.1177/ 0049124101029003005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Burk, W. J. (2010). A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 39–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00623.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knutson, J. F., DeGarmo, D. S., & Reid, J. B. (2004). Social disadvantage and neglectful parenting as precursors to the development of antisocial and aggressive child behavior: Testing a theoretical model. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 187–205. doi: 10.1002/ab.20016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koepke, S., & Denissen, J. J. (2012). Dynamics of identity development and separation–individuation in parent–child relationships during adolescence and emerging adulthood: A conceptual integration. Developmental Review, 32, 67–88. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2012.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kwon, J. A., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2014). Linking family economic pressure and supportive parenting to adolescent health behaviors: Two developmental pathways leading to health promoting and health risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1176–1190. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0060-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049–1065. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01588.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Larson, R. W., Richards, M. H., Moneta, G., Holmbeck, G., & Duckett, E. (1996). Changes in adolescents’ daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and transformation. Developmental Psychology, 32, 744–754. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.32.4.744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (2009). Parent–child relationships during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 3–32). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Laursen, B., Coy, K. C., & Collins, W. A. (1998). Reconsidering changes in parent–child conflict across adolescence: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 69, 817–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06245.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Liberman, A. M., Kirk, D. S., & Kim, K. (2014). Labeling effects of first juvenile arrests: Secondary deviance and secondary sanctioning. Criminology, 52, 345–370. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lippold, M. A., Davis, K. D., Lawson, K. M., & McHale, S. M. (2016). Day-to-day consistency in positive parent–child interactions and youth well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 3584–3592. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0502-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Age-crime curve.  In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 12–18). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Loeber, R., Hipwell, A. E., Pardini, D. P., Stepp, S. D., & Ahonen, L. (2015). Constancy and change in the prevalence and frequency of offending when based on longitudinal self reports or official records: Comparisons by gender, race, and crime type. Journal of Developmental and Life Course Criminology, 1, 150–168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Loeber, R., Jennings, W. G., Ahonen, L., Piquero, A. R., & Farrington, D. P. (2017). Gender differences: Comparisons with males in the Pittsburgh youth study. In R. Loeber, W. G. Jennings, L. Ahonen, A. R. Piquero, & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Female delinquency from childhood to young adulthood: Recent results from the Pittsburgh Girls Study (pp. 29–35). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Maccoby, E. E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006–1017. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. May, L. M., Reinka, M. A., Tipsord, J. M., Felver, J. C., & Berkman, E. T. (2016). Parenting an early adolescent: A pilot study examining neural and relationship quality changes of a mindfulness intervention. Mindfulness, 7, 1203–1213. doi: 10.1007/s12671-016-0563-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McKay, R. B., Breslow, M. J., Sangster, R. L., Gabbard, S. M., Reynolds, R. W., Nakamoto, J. M., & Tarnai, J. (1996). Translating survey questionnaires: Lessons learned. New Directions for Evaluation, 1996, 93–104. doi: 10.1002/ev.1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Michelson, D., Ben-Zion, I., James, A. I., Draper, L., Penney, C., & Day, C. (2014). ‘Living with Teenagers’: Feasibility study of a peer-led parenting intervention for socially disadvantaged families with adolescent children. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 99, 731–737. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Mulvey, E. P. (2009). Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1654–1668. doi: 10.1037/a0015862.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Mulford, C. F., Blachman-Demner, D. R., Pitzer, L., Schubert, C. A., Piquero, A. R., & Mulvey, E. P. (2016). Victim offender overlap: Dual trajectory examination of victimization and offending among young felony offenders over seven years. Victims & Offenders, 1–27. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2016.1196283
  45. Murray, K. W., Dwyer, K. M., Rubin, K. H., Knighton-Wisor, S., & Booth-LaForce, C. (2014). Parent–child relationships, parental psychological control, and aggression: Maternal and paternal relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1361–1373. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0019-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Nagin, D. S. (2016). Group-based trajectory modeling and criminal career research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53, 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nagin, D. S., & Odgers, C. L. (2010a). Group-based trajectory modeling (nearly) two decades later. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 445–453. doi: 10.1007/s10940-010-9113-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Nagin, D. S., & Odgers, C. L. (2010b). Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 109–138. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569. doi: 10.1080/10705510701575396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) (2015) OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book. Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/crime/qa05101.asp?qaDate=2014
  52. Osgood, D. W., McMorris, B. J., & Potenza, M. T. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance: Item response theory scaling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 267–296. doi: 10.1023/A:1016008004010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Palmer, E. J., & Hollin, C. R. (2001). Sociomoral reasoning, perceptions of parenting and self-reported delinquency in adolescents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 85–100. doi: 10.1002/1099-0720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pastorelli, C., Lansford, J. E., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Malone, P. S., Di Giunta, L., Bacchini, D., Bombi, A. S., Zelli, A., Miranda, M. C., Bornstein, M. H., Tapanya, S., Tirado, L. M. U., Alampay, L. P., Al-Hassan, S. M., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A., Oburu, P., Skinner, A. T., & Sorbring, E. (2015). Positive parenting and children’s prosocial behavior in eight countries. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 824–834. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Perris, C., Arindell, W. A., & Eisemann, M. (1994). Parenting and psychopathology. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Ray, J. V., Frick, P. J., Thornton, L. C., Wall Myers, T. D., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2016). Callous–unemotional traits predict self-reported offending in adolescent boys: The mediating role of delinquent peers and the moderating role of parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 53, 319–328. doi: 10.1037/dev0000210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Rozzell, L. (2013). The role of family engagement in creating trauma-informed juvenile justice systems. National Center for Child Traumatic Stress. Retrieved from http://www.nctsn.org/sites/default/files/assets/pdfs/jj_trauma_brief_familyengagement_rozzelll_final.pdf.
  58. Russell, M. A., & Odgers, C. L. (2016). Desistance and life-course persistence: Findings from longitudinal studies using group-based trajectory modeling of antisocial behavior. In K. Heilbrun, D. DeMatteo, E. S. & Goldstein Naomi (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 159–175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/14643-008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simons, L. G., Sutton, T. E., Simons, R. L., Gibbons, F. X., & Murry, V. M. (2016). Mechanisms that link parenting practices to adolescents’ risky sexual behavior: A test of six competing theories. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 255–270. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0409-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Smetana, J. G., Metzger, A., Gettman, D. C., & Campione-Barr, N. (2006). Disclosure and secrecy in adolescent–parent relationships. Child Development, 77, 201–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00865.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, J. D., Knoble, N. B., Zerr, A. A., Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2014). Family check-up effects across diverse ethnic groups: Reducing early-adolescence antisocial behavior by reducing family conflict. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43, 400–414. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.888670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 125–146. doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-3950-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stack, D. M., Serbin, L. A., Enns, L. N., Ruttle, P. L., & Barrieau, L. (2010). Parental effects on children’s emotional development over time and across generations. Infants & Young Children, 23, 52–69. doi: 10.1097/IYC.0b013e3181c97606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stallman, H. M., & Ralph, A. (2007). Reducing risk factors for adolescent behavioural and emotional problems: A pilot randomised controlled trial of a self-administered parenting intervention. Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health, 6, 125–137.Google Scholar
  65. Stanton, B. F., Li, X., Galbraith, J., Cornick, G., Feigelman, S., Kaljee, L., & Zhou, Y. (2000). Parental underestimates of adolescent risk behavior: A randomized, controlled trial of a parental monitoring intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 18–26. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00022-1.
  66. Starrels, M. E. (1994). Gender differences in parent–child relations. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 148–165. doi: 10.1177/019251394015001007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072–1085. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Steinberg, L. (1990). Interdependency in the family: Autonomy, conflict, and harmony in the parent–adolescent relationship. In S. S. Feldman, & G. R. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 255–276). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Steinberg, L., Blatt‐Eisengart, I., & Cauffman, E. (2006). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful homes: A replication in a sample of serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 47–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00119.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266–1281. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01694.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Tapia, M., Alarid, L. F., & Hutcherson, II, D. T. (2015). Youthful arrest and parental support: Gendered effects in straining the parent–child relationship. Deviant Behavior, 36, 674–690. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2014.951584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walker, S. C., Bishop, A. S., Pullmann, M. D., & Bauer, G. (2015). A research framework for understanding the practical impact of family involvement in the juvenile justice system: The juvenile justice family involvement model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56, 408–421. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9755-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Williams, L. R., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Reciprocal relations between parenting and adjustment in a sample of juvenile offenders. Child Development, 82, 633–645. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01523.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Wolfradt, U., Hempel, S., & Miles, J. N. (2003). Perceived parenting styles, depersonalisation, anxiety and coping behaviour in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 521–532. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00092-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2001). Parental efficacy and delinquent behavior: Do control and support matter? Criminology, 39, 677–706. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00937.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations