Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 1179–1199 | Cite as

Wisdom Gained? Assessing Relationships Between Adversity, Personality and Well-Being Among a Late Adolescent Sample

  • Eranda Jayawickreme
  • Nicole W. Brocato
  • Laura E. R. Blackie
Empirical Research

Abstract

How do late adolescents make sense of stressful life events they have experienced in their lives? In a sample of 1320 college students, 676 (58% White, 63% female) reported the stressful events they had experienced in their lifetime up until the present survey and indicated whether they considered each stressful event to be a turning point and/or an opportunity for wisdom. Students also completed measures of personality and well-being. We hypothesized that the tendency to interpret stressful events as turning points or opportunities for wisdom would explain the associations between three personality characteristics (Openness to Experience, Extraversion, and Emotionality) and well-being. We used a multi-step ESEM approach in which we first assessed the measurement structure of our items before testing partial and complete structural models. We tested partial and structural models according to extant guidelines associated with the evaluation of indirect effects models. We did not find support for the indirect effects model, but Openness was associated with the tendency to view stressful events as turning points, and Openness and Extraversion were associated with the tendency to view stressful events as leading to wisdom, as well as with increased well-being.

Keywords

Wisdom Adversity Personality Well-being 

References

  1. Affleck, G., Tennen, H., Croog, S., & Levine, S. (1987). Causal attribution, perceived benefits, and morbidity after a heart attack: An 8-year study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Affleck, G., & Tennen, H. (1991). The effect of newborn intensive care on parents’ pschological well-being. Children’s Health Care, 20(1), 6–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldwin, C. M., Sutton, K. J., & Lachman, M. (1996). The development of coping resources in adulthood. Journal of personality, 64(4), 837–871.Google Scholar
  4. Arnett, J. J. (2016). College students as emerging adults: The developmental implications of the college context. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. http://hexaco.org/hexaco-inventory Facet information was downloaded from the HEXACO website at.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Asparouhov, T. (2015). Mplus discussion board posting: http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/22/72.
  8. Asparouhov, T. (2016). Mplus discussion board posting: http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/23/6984.html?1462829719.
  9. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 397–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Multiple imputation with Mplus. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/Imputations7.pdf.
  11. Baraldi, A. N., & Enders, C. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 5–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholgoy, 31, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bauer, J. J., McAdams, D. P., & Sakaeda, A. R. (2005). Interpreting the good life: growth memories in the lives of mature, happy people. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88(1), 203–217.Google Scholar
  14. Blackie, L. E. R., & Jayawickreme, E. (2014). Promoting change in posttraumatic growth research: response to commentaries. European Journal of Personality, 28, 351–361.Google Scholar
  15. Blackie, L. E. R., Jayawickreme, E., Tsukayama, E., Forgeard, M. J., Roepke, A. M., & Fleeson, W. (2016). Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Developing a measure to assess within-person variability. Journal of Research in Personality. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.001. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
  16. Bruner, J. (1994). The "remembered" self. In U. Neisser & R. Fivush (Eds.), The remembering self: Construction and accuracy in the self-narrative (pp. 41–54). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Clausen, J. A. (1995). Gender, contexts, and turning points in adults’ lives. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 389–365). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(4), 319–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Forgeard, M. J. C., Mecklenburg, A. C., Lacasse, J. J., & Jayawickreme, E. (2014). Bringing the whole universe to order: Creativity, healing, and posttraumatic growth. In J. C. Kaufman (Ed.), Creativity and mental illness (pp. 321–342). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Frazier, P., Tix, A., & Barron, K. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray, M. J., Litz, B. T., Hsu, J. L., & Lombardo, T. W. (2004). Psychometric properties of the life events checklist. Assessment, 11(4), 330–341.Google Scholar
  23. Grossmann, I., Gerlach, T. M., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2016). Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayduk, L., & Glaser, N. (2000). Jiving the four-step, waltzing around factor analysis, and other serious fun. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmbeck, G. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoyle, R., & Smith, G. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 429–440.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hyland, P., Boduszek, D., Dhingra, K., Shevlin, M., & Egan, A. (2014). A bifactor approach to modeling the Rosenberg self esteem scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 188–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jayawickreme, E., & Blackie, L. E. R. (2014). Post‐traumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions. European Journal of Personality, 28(4), 312–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jayawickreme, E., & Blackie, L. E. R. (2016). Exploring the psychological benefits of hardship: A critical reassessment of posttraumatic growth. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jayawickreme, E., Forgeard, M. J., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). The engine of well-being. Review of General Psychology, 16(4), 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kenny, D., & McCoach, D. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling – A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kline, R. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford.Google Scholar
  34. Li, C.-H. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936–949. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Little, T. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford.Google Scholar
  36. Marsh, H., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Marsh, H., Morin, A., Parker, P., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Marsh, H., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Applications to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McAdams, D. P., & Bowman, P. J. (2001). Narrating life’s turning points: Redemption and contamination. In D. P. McAdams, R. Josselson, & A. Lieblich (Eds.), Turns in the road: Narrative studies of lives in transition (pp. 3–34). Washington DC, WA: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McAdams, D. P., & de St Aubin, E. D. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McAdams, D. P., Reynolds, J., Lewis, M., Patten, A. H., & Bowman, P. J. (2001). When bad things turn good and good things turn bad: Sequences of redemption and contamination in life narrative and their relation to psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults and in students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(4), 474–485. doi:10.1177/0146167201274008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McLean, K. C., & Thorne, A. (2003). Late adolescents’ self-defining memories about relationships. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 635.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McLean, K. C. (2005). Late adolescent identity development: Narrative meaning making and memory telling. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 683.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. McLean, K. C., & Pratt, M. W. (2006). Life’s little (and big) lessons: identity statuses and meaning-making in the turning point narratives of emerging adults. Developmental psychology, 42(4), 714–722.Google Scholar
  46. Molina, J. G., Rodrigo, M., Losilla, J.-M., & Vives, J. (2014). Wording effects and the factor structure of the 12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12). Psychological Assessment, 26, 1031–1037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mõttus, R. (2016). Towards more rigorous personality trait–outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30, 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mulaik, S., & Millsap, R. (2000). Doing the four-step right. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 36–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2010). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  51. OECD (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264191655-en.
  52. Pals, J. L., & McAdams, D. P. (2004). The transformed self: A narrative understanding of posttraumatic growth. Psychological Inquiry, 65–69.Google Scholar
  53. Pavot, W., Diener, E. D., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1), 149–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pillemer, D. B. (1998). Momentous events, vivid memories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau- Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Roberts, B. W., & Mroczek, D. (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 31–35. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Roberts, B. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2001). The kids are alright: Growth and stability in personality development from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 670–683. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Roepke, A. M., Jayawickreme, E., & Riffle, O. M. (2014). Meaning and health: A systematic review. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(4), 1055–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rubin, D. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. SAS Institute Inc. (2014). SAS 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
  62. Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1062–1075.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 862–882. doi:10.1037/a0024950.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Wisdom: Its nature, origins and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Supple, A., Su, J., Plunkett, S., Peterson, G., & Bush, K. (2012). Factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 748–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sutin, A. R., Costa, Jr, P. T., Wethington, E., & Eaton, W. (2010a). Turning points and lessons learned: stressful life events and personality trait development across middle adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 524–533.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sutin, A. R., Costa, Jr, P. T., Wethington, E., & Eaton, W. (2010b). Perceptions of stressful life events as turning points are associated with self-rated health and psychological distress. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 23(5), 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tavernier, R., & Willoughby, T. (2012). Adolescent turning points: The association between meaning making and psychological well-being. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1058–1068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tesch, S. A., & Cameron, K. A. (1987). Openness to experience and development of adult identity. Journal of Personality, 55(4), 615–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wethington, E. (2003). Turning points as opportunities for psychological growth. In J. Hadit, & C. Keyes (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 37–53). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wouters, E., Booysen, Fl. R., Ponnet, K., & Baron Van Loon, F. (2010). Wording effects and the factor structure of the hospital anxiety & depression scale in HIV/AIDS patients on antiretroviral treatment in South Africa. PLoS ONE, 7(4), e34881. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yu, C.-Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from the Mplus website http://www.statmodel.com/download/Yudissertation.pdf.
  75. Zalta, A. K., Gillihan, S. J., Fisher, A. J., Mintz, J., McLean, C. P., Yehuda, R., & Foa, E. B. (2014). Change in negative cognitions associated with PTSD predicts symptom reduction in prolonged exposure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(1), 171–175.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eranda Jayawickreme
    • 1
  • Nicole W. Brocato
    • 1
  • Laura E. R. Blackie
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOffice of Institutional Research, Wake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA
  2. 2.School of Psychology, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations