Who Chooses STEM Careers? Using A Relative Cognitive Strength and Interest Model to Predict Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
Career aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are formulated in adolescence, making the high school years a critical time period for identifying the cognitive and motivational factors that increase the likelihood of future STEM employment. While past research has mainly focused on absolute cognitive ability levels in math and verbal domains, the current study tested whether relative cognitive strengths and interests in math, science, and verbal domains in high school were more accurate predictors of STEM career decisions. Data were drawn from a national longitudinal study in the United States (N = 1762; 48 % female; the first wave during ninth grade and the last wave at age 33). Results revealed that in the high-verbal/high-math/high-science ability group, individuals with higher science task values and lower orientation toward altruism were more likely to select STEM occupations. In the low-verbal/moderate-math/moderate-science ability group, individuals with higher math ability and higher math task values were more likely to select STEM occupations. The findings suggest that youth with asymmetrical cognitive ability profiles are more likely to select careers that utilize their cognitive strengths rather than their weaknesses, while symmetrical cognitive ability profiles may grant youth more flexibility in their options, allowing their interests and values to guide their career decisions.
KeywordsSTEM Individual differences Career choices Relative cognitive strength Relative interest
This project was supported by Grant HD074731-01 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development (NICHD).
MTW conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and drafted the manuscript; FY participated in the design and interpretation of the data and performed the statistical analysis; JLD participated in the interpretation of the data and drafted part of the manuscript. The second and third authors made equal intellectual contribution to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. A review conducted by the Institutional Review Board approved the study to be consistent with the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects and to meet the requirements of the Federal Guidelines.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Allison, P. D. (2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. Paper presented at the SAS Global Forum, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, R. D., Hugo, J., Lundgren, D., Shapiro, M. J., & Thomas, J. (2007). Addressing the STEM challenge by expanding specialty math and science high schools. NCSSSMST Journal http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ855272.pdf.
- Eccles, J. S., Lord, S. E., Roeser, R. W., Barber, B. L., & Jozefowicz, D. M. (1997). The association of school transitions in early adolescence with developmental trajectories through high school. In J. Schulenberg, J. I. Maggs, & K. Hurrelmann (Eds.), Health risks and developmental transitions during adolescence (pp. 283–321). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. 5th edn. (pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Landivar, L. C. (2013). Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin. American Community Survey Reports, ACS-24. Washington, D.C: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. D. Longitudinal Study of American Youth, 1987-1994, and 2007 [Computer file]. ICPSR30263-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2011-04-01. doi:10.3886/ICPSR30263.v1.Google Scholar
- National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1986a). Math Objectives 1985-86 Assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
- National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1986b). Science Objectives 1985-86 Assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
- Parker, P., Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., & Ludtke, O. (2014). Predicting career aspirations and university majors from academic ability and self-concept: A longitudinal application of the internal–external frame of reference model. In I. Schoon, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Gender differences in aspirations and attainment: A life course perspective (pp. 224–246). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, M. T. (2012). Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 1, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Wang, M. -T., Degol, J. L., & Ye, F. (2015). Math achievement is important, but task values are critical too: Examining the intellectual and motivational factors leading to gender disparities in STEM careers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Wigfield, A., Byrnes, J. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Development during early and middle adolescence. In P. A. Alexander, & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology, 2nd edition (pp. 87–114). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The condition of education: Concentration of public school students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. Retrieved on February 24, 2016 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_clb.asp.