Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 45, Issue 10, pp 2022–2035 | Cite as

Congruence and Incongruence in Adolescents’ and Parents’ Perceptions of the Family: Using Response Surface Analysis to Examine Links with Adolescents’ Psychological Adjustment

  • Lauren J. Human
  • Melanie A. Dirks
  • Anita DeLongis
  • Edith Chen
Empirical Research

Abstract

Parents and adolescents often hold discrepant views about the family environment and these discrepancies may in turn influence adolescents’ psychological adjustment. The current study examined how adolescent–parent perceptions of family routines and chaos, and their congruence and incongruence, relate to adolescents’ self-reported psychological adjustment (depressive symptoms and perceived stress), both concurrently (N dyads = 261; 53 % female) and 2 years later (N dyads = 118; 50 % female). Using polynomial regression and response surface analysis, results indicated that adolescents’ perceptions of the family environment were a stronger predictor of adolescents’ adjustment than parents’ perceptions (76 % mothers), concurrently and over time. However, both congruence and incongruence in adolescent–parent perceptions were also related to adolescents’ adjustment. Specifically, congruently negative adolescent–parent perceptions were associated with worse concurrent adolescent adjustment. Further, incongruence defined by more negativity in adolescents’ versus parents’ perceptions was associated with worse adolescent psychological adjustment, concurrently and over time. In sum, in addition to the strong links between adolescents’ perceptions of the family and their own psychological adjustment, examining how congruent and incongruent adolescents’ perceptions are with parents’ perceptions may shed additional light on how the family environment relates to adolescent adjustment.

Keywords

Adolescent–parent discrepancies Adolescent psychological adjustment Family chaos Family routines Polynomial regression Response surface analysis 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

LH participated in the conception of the paper, performed the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript; MD participated in the conception of the paper, consulted on the statistical approach, and provided critical revisions to the manuscript; AD participated in the design of the study and provided critical revisions to the manuscript; EC conceived of the study design and coordination, and provided critical revisions to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant funding reference number: 97872.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All study procedures were approved by the University of British Columbia behavioral research ethics review board and were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from parent participants and assent was obtained from adolescent participants.

References

  1. Bush, K. R., & Peterson, G. W. (Eds.). (2013). Parent–child relationships in diverse contexts. In Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 275–302). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Carlson, C. I., Cooper, C. R., & Sradling, V. Y. (1991). Developmental implications of shared versus distinct perceptions of the family in early adolescence. New Directions for Child Development, 51, 13–32. doi: 10.1002/cd.23219915103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. De Los Reyes, A., Augenstein, T. M., Wang, M., Thomas, S. A., Drabick, D. A. G., Burgers, D., & Rabinowitz, J. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 858–900. doi: 10.1037/a0038498.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. De Los Reyes, A., Goodman, K. L., Kliewer, W., & Reid-Quiñones, K. (2008). Whose depression relates to discrepancies? Testing relations between informant characteristics and informant discrepancies from both informants’ perspectives. Psychological Assessment, 20, 139–149. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. De Los Reyes, A., Goodman, K. L., Kliewer, W., & Reid-Quiñones, K. (2010). The longitudinal consistency of mother–child reporting discrepancies of parental monitoring and their ability to predict child delinquent behaviors two years later. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1417–1430. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9496-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. De Los Reyes, A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2004). Applying depression–distortion hypotheses to the assessment of peer victimization in adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 325–335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dirks, M. A., De Los Reyes, A., Briggs-Gowan, M., Cella, D., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2012). Annual Research Review: Embracing not erasing contextual variability in children’s behavior—theory and utility in the selection and use of methods and informants in developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 558–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02537.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Dirks, M. A., Weersing, V. R., Warnick, E., Gonzalez, A., Alton, M., Dauser, C., et al. (2014). Parent and youth report of youth anxiety: Evidence for measurement invariance. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 284–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dumas, J. E., Nissley, J., Nordstrom, A., Smith, E. P., Prinz, R. J., & Levine, D. W. (2005). Home chaos: Sociodemographic, parenting, interactional, and child correlates. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 93–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In F. Drasgow & N. W. Schmitt (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Ehrlich, K. B., Richards, J. M., Lejuez, C. W., & Cassidy, J. (2015). When parents and adolescents disagree about disagreeing: observed parent–adolescent communication predicts informant discrepancies about conflict. Journal of Research on Adolescence. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1111/jora.12197.
  15. Evans, G. W., Gonnella, C., Marcynyszyn, L. A., Gentile, L., & Salpekar, N. (2005). The role of chaos in poverty and children’s socioemotional adjustment. Psychological Science, 16, 560–565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferdinand, R. F., van der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2004). Parent–adolescent disagreement regarding psychopathology in adolescents from the general population as a risk factor for adverse outcome. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 198–206. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.2.198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiese, B. H., Tomcho, T. J., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: cause for celebration? Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 381–390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Furr, R. M. (2011). Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaylord, N. K., Kitzmann, K. M., & Coleman, J. K. (2003). Parents’ and children’s perceptions of parental behavior: Associations with children’s psychosocial adjustment in the classroom. Parenting Science and Practice, 3, 23. doi: 10.1207/S15327922PAR0301_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guion, K., Mrug, S., & Windle, M. (2009). Predictive value of informant discrepancies in reports of parenting: Relations to early adolescents’ adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 17–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Human, L. J., Chan, M., DeLongis, A., Roy, L., Miller, G. E., & Chen, E. (2014). Parental accuracy regarding adolescent daily experiences: Relationships with adolescent psychological adjustment and inflammatory regulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 76, 603–610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaffee, S. R., Hanscombe, K. B., Haworth, C. M. A., Davis, O. S. P., & Plomin, R. (2012). Chaotic homes and children’s disruptive behavior: A longitudinal cross-lagged twin study. Psychological Science, 23, 643–650.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Jensen, E. W., James, S. A., Boyce, W. T., & Hartnett, S. A. (1983). The Family Routines Inventory: Development and validation. Social Science and Medicine, 4, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laird, R. D., & De Los Reyes, A. (2013). Testing informant discrepancies as predictors of early adolescent psychopathology: Why difference scores cannot tell you what you want to know and how polynomial regression may. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9659-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Laird, R. D., & Weems, C. F. (2011). The equivalence of regression models using difference scores and models using separate scores for each informant: implications for the study of informant discrepancies. Psychological Assessment, 23, 388–397. doi: 10.1037/a0021926.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lau, A. S., Garland, A. F., Yeh, M., Mccabe, K. M., Wood, P. A., & Hough, R. L. (2004). Race/ethnicity and inter-informant agreement in assessing adolescent psychopathology. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manczak, E., McLean, K. C., McAdams, D. P., & Chen, E. (2015). Physiological reactivity during parent–adolescent discussions: Associations with scaffolding behaviors and relationship quality. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 522–531. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9680-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Matheny, A. P., Wachs, T. D., Ludwig, J. L., & Phillips, K. (1995). Bringing order out of chaos: Psychometric characteristics of the confusion, hubbub, and order scale. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 16, 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 587–604. doi: 10.1037/a0017479.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Minuchin, P. (2002). Looking toward the horizon: Present and future in the study of family systems. In J. P. McHale & W. S. Grolnick (Eds.), Retrospect and prospect in the psychological study of families (pp. 259–278). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Ohannessian, C. M., & De Los Reyes, A. (2014). Discrepancies in adolescents’ and their mothers’ perceptions of the family and adolescent anxiety symptomatology. Parenting: Science and Practice, 18, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ohannessian, C. M., Laird, R. D., & De Los Reyes, A. (2016). Discrepancies in adolescents’ and their mother’s perceptions of the family and mothers’ psychological symptomatology. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0477-3.
  33. Ohannessian, C. M., Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., & von Eye, A. (2000). Adolescent–parent discrepancies in perceptions of family functioning and early adolescent self-competence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pelton, J., & Forehand, R. (2001). Discrepancy between mother and child perceptions of their relationship: I. Consequences for adolescents considered within the context of parental divorce. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 1–15. doi: 10.1023/A:1026527008239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Repetti, R. L., Taylor, S. E., & Seeman, T. E. (2002). Risky families: Family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 330–366. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schönbrodt, F. D. (2015). RSA: An R package for response surface analysis (version 0.9.6). Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSA/index.html.
  38. Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 543–554. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tein, J. Y., Roosa, M. W., & Michaels, M. (1994). Agreement between parent and child reports on parental behaviors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 341–355. doi: 10.2307/353104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Youngstrom, E., Izard, C., & Ackerman, B. (1999). Dysphoria-related bias in maternal ratings of children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 905–916. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren J. Human
    • 1
  • Melanie A. Dirks
    • 1
  • Anita DeLongis
    • 2
  • Edith Chen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Cells to Society (C2S): The Center on Social Disparities and Health, Institute for Policy Research, Department of PsychologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations