The Mobility of Youth in the Justice System: Implications for Recidivism
- 512 Downloads
Both residential mobility and community disadvantage have been shown to be associated with negative outcomes for adolescents generally and juvenile offenders specifically. The current study examines the effects of moving among a large sample (n = 13,096) of previously adjudicated youth (31.6 % female, 41.2 % Black, 16.5 % Hispanic). Additionally, we examine whether moving upward to a more affluent neighborhood, moving downward to an area of greater disadvantage, or moving laterally to a similar neighborhood tempers the effects of residential mobility. We use a combination of analytical techniques, including propensity score matching to untangle the effects of mobility sans pre-existing conditions between movers and non-movers. Results show relocation increases recidivism, irrespective of the direction of the move with regard to socioeconomic context. Moving upward has the most detrimental impact for adjudicated male adolescents, while downward relocations evidenced the largest effect for female youth. Implications for policy and future research needs are discussed.
KeywordsResidential mobility Recidivism Juvenile offenders
KW conceived of the project and its design, drafted a significant portion of the manuscript, designed the study methodology, and performed the statistical analyses. MB drafted a significant portion of the manuscript, participated in the design of study methodology, and participated in cleaning the data and creating appropriate measures. JI drafted significant portions of the manuscript, participated in the design of study methodology, and consulted on statistical analysis. MG provided both assistance with drafting of the manuscript, editorial support, provided insight into the juvenile justice system, procured the data, obtained approval for use of the data, and provided input into appropriate analysis of the data. NE cleaned the data, combined data from multiple sources, geo-coded the data, and provided editorial support. All authors read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.
Support for this project was provided by a PSC-CUNY Award, jointly funded by The Professional Staff Congress and The City University of New York.
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflict of interests.
Approval for this project was acquired from the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice Institutional Review Board as well as the John Jay College of Criminal Justice Institutional Review Board.
As the project involved only secondary data analysis from official sources, there was no need for informed consent.
- Brett, J., & Werbel, J. (1980). The effect of job transfers on employees and their families. Washington, DC: Employee Relocation Council.Google Scholar
- Cohen, P., Brook, J. S., Cohen, J., Velez, N., & Garcia, M. (1990). Common and uncommon pathways to adolescent psychopathology and problem behavior. In L. N. Robins & M. Rutter (Eds.), Straight and devious pathways from childhood to adulthood (pp. 242–258). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, P., Johnson, J., Struening, E. L., & Brook, J. S. (1989). Family mobility as a risk factor for childhood psychopathology. In B. Cooper & T. Helgason (Eds.), Epidemiology and the prevention of mental disorders (pp. 145–156). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Giordano, P. C., & Cernkovich, S. A. (1997). Gender and antisocial behavior. In David M. Stoff, James Breiling, & Jack D. Maser (Eds.), The handbook of antisocial behavior (pp. 496–510). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Goering, J., & Feins, J. D. (Eds.). (2003). Choosing a better life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunities social experiment. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Gorman-Smith, D. (2008). Urban neighborhoods, families, and juvenile delinquency. The Prevention Researcher, 15, 17–20.Google Scholar
- Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Haynie, D. L., & South, S. J. (2005). Residential mobility and adolescent violence. Social Forces, 84, 363–376.Google Scholar
- Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. E. Lynn Jr & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Kling, J. R., Ludwig, J., & Katz, L. F. (2005). Neighborhood effects on crime for female and male youth: Evidence from a randomized housing voucher experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 87–130.Google Scholar
- Orthner, D. K., Brody, G., & Covi, R. (1985). The teenager’s survival guide to moving. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Orthner, D. K., Giddings, M., & Quinn, W. (1987). Youth in transition: A study of Air Force youth. Washington, DC: U.S. Air Force.Google Scholar
- Pitney Bowes. (2015). MapMarker 24.1 release notes. Retrieved from http://www.pbinsight.com/support/product-documentation/details/mapmarker-mapmarker-plus-us.
- Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 3, 33–38.Google Scholar
- Rubinowitz, L. S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to white suburbia. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Shaw, J. (1982). Geographic mobility and the military child. Military Medicine, 140, 416–440.Google Scholar
- Shaw, C., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2014a). Reason for moving: 2012 to 2013. Current population reports, P20-574 (pp. 1–15). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2014b). ACS summary file technical documentation: 2009–2013 ACS 5-year data release. Retrieved from http://www2.census.gov/acs2013_1yr/summaryfile/ACS_2013_SF_Tech_Doc.pdf.
- Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Wolff, K. T., Baglivio, M. T., & Piquero, A. R. (2015b). The relationship between adverse childhood experiences and recidivism in a sample of juvenile offenders in community-based treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15613992.PubMedGoogle Scholar