Status Differences in Target-Specific Prosocial Behavior and Aggression
- 713 Downloads
Previous studies exploring the link between social status and behavior have predominantly utilized measures that do not provide information regarding toward whom aggression or prosocial behavior is directed. Using a contextualized target-specific approach, this study examined whether high- and low-status adolescents behave differently toward peers of varying levels of status. Participants, aged 11–15 (N = 426, 53 % females), completed measures assessing aggression and prosocial behavior toward each same-sex grademate. A distinct pattern of findings emerged regarding the likeability, popularity, and dominance status of adolescents and their peer targets. Popular adolescents reported more direct aggression, indirect aggression, and prosocial behavior toward popular peers than did unpopular adolescents. Well-accepted adolescents reported more prosocial behavior toward a wider variety of peers than did rejected adolescents. Finally, compared to subordinate adolescents, dominant adolescents reported greater direct and indirect aggression toward dominant than subordinate peers. The results highlight the importance of studying target-specific behavior to better understand the status-behavior link.
KeywordsAggression Prosocial behavior Likeability Popularity Dominance Early adolescence
The authors are grateful for the support provided for this research from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council awarded to author Closson. We thank Dr. Bruno Zumbo for his assistance with statistical analyses on an earlier version of this manuscript. We also wish to thank the students, administrators, and schools who participated in this project.
LC conceived of the study, collected the data, performed analyses and interpretation of the data, and drafted the manuscript. SH was involved in the concept and design of the study, and helped draft the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Support was provided for this research from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council awarded to author Closson (Award No. 752-2008-1758).
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interests.
Ethics approval for this research was issued by the Behavioural Research Ethics Board at the University of British Columbia (Certificate Number: H09-02294).
Informed parental consent and child assent were obtained prior to data collection.
- Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bukowski, W. M., & Abecassis, M. (2007). Self, other, and aggression: The never-ending search for the roots of adaptation. In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, & P. C. Rodkin (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior (pp. 185–207). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2009). In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowksi, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 45–62). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hymel, S., Closson, L. M., Caravita, S. C. S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2010). Social status among peers: From sociometric attraction to peer acceptance to perceived popularity. In P. K. Smith & C. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of childhood social development (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., & Congdon, R. (2009). HLM for Windows. Version 6.08. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.Google Scholar
- Salmivalli, C., Karna, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2009). From peer putdowns to peer support: A theoretical model and how it translated into a national anti-bullying program. In S. Shimerson, S. Swearer, & D. Espelage (Eds.), The handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 441–454). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Statistics Canada (2007). 2006 Community Profiles. 2006 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 92-591-XWE. Ottawa. Released 13 March 2007.Google Scholar
- Vaughn, S., McIntosh, R., & Spencer-Rowe, J. (1991). Peer rejection is a stubborn thing: Increasing peer acceptance of rejected students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6(2), 83–88.Google Scholar