Youth–adult partnerships (e.g., youth leading programs, participating as members of advisory boards) are a common and widely recommended practice in youth work and youth-serving program settings. Although researchers have suggested that these opportunities contribute to youth’s identity development, empirical evidence is lacking. In the current study, we tested associations between identity style and degree of youth voice, collaborative youth–adult relationships, and youth’s program engagement in 194 youth participating in youth–adult partnerships (M age = 17.6, 62 % female). We found that these characteristics of youth–adult partnerships predicted higher informational identity style, although only program engagement emerged as a unique predictor. Furthermore, exploratory analysis indicated that these associations were moderated by the type of organization. The findings suggest the need for more research on the multiple dimensions of youth–adult partnerships and their association with youth functioning, as well as pointing to the importance of the broader organizational context of youth–adult partnerships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., Jacquelynne, S. Eccles, J. S., & Smith, C. (2013). Youth belonging and cognitive engagement in organized activities: A large-scale field study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34, 208–218. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.05.001
Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., & Smith, C. (2014). Involving youth in program decision-making: How common and what might it do for youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1844–1860. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0183-y.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Doubleday.
Berzonsky, M. D. (2011). Identity processes. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 1, pp. 1363–1369). New York, NY: Springer.
Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Smits, I., Papini, D. R., & Goossens, L. (2013). Development and validation of the revised Identity Style Inventory (ISI-5): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 25, 893–904.
Blanchet-Cohen, N., & Bedeaux, C. (2014). Towards a right-based approach to youth programs: Duty-bearers perspectives in Montreal. Children and Youth Services Review, 38, 75–81. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.01.009.
Blanchet-Cohen, N., & Brunson, L. (2014). Creating settings for youth empowerment and leadership: An ecological perspective. Child and Youth Services, 35, 216–236. doi:10.1080/0145935X.2014.938735.
Blanchet-Cohen, N. Linds, W., Mann-Feder, V., & Yuen, F. (Eds.) (2013). Transforming practices: Emancipatory approaches to youth engagement. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 3, 320–327.
Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80, 576–610. doi:10.3102/0034654310364533.
Borden, L., & Serido, J. (2009). From program participant to engaged citizen: A developmental journey. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 423–438. doi:10.1002/jcop.20293.
Camino, L., & Zeldin, S. (2002). From periphery to center: Pathways for youth civic engagement in the day-to-day life of communities. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 213–220. doi:10.1002/jcop.20043.
Cargo, M., Grams, G. D., Ottoson, J. M., Ward, P., & Green, L. W. (2003). Empowerment as fostering positive youth development and citizenship. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, S66–S79.
Cater, M. D. W. (2006). How voice affects perceptions of relationship with adults, ownership, and engagement in youth (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College).
Cater, M., Machtmes, K., & Fox, J. (2008). An examination of youth voice via quasi- experimental methodology. Journal of Youth Development, 3(2). Retrieved from http://data.memberclicks.com/site/nae4a/JYD_080302final.pdf.
Cater, M., Machtmes, K., & Fox, J. E. (2013). A phenomenological examination of context on adolescent ownership and engagement rationale. The Qualitative Report, 18, 1–13.
Chilenski, S. M., Olson, J. R., Schulte, J. A., Perkins, D. F., & Spoth, R. (2015). A multi-level examination of how the organizational context relates to readiness to implement prevention and evidence-based programming in community settings. Evaluation and Program Planning, 48, 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.10.004.
Crocetti, E., Erentaitė, R., & Žukauskienė, R. (2014a). Identity styles, positive youth development, and civic engagement in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1818–1828. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0100-4.
Crocetti, E., Garckija, R., Gabrialavičiūtė, I., Vosylis, R., & Žukauskienė, R. (2014b). Reciprocal associations between identity and civic engagement in adolescence: A two-wave longitudinal study. International Journal of Developmental Science, 8, 115–124. doi:10.3233/DEV-1400139.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Gambone, M. A., Yu, H. C., Lewis-Charp, M., Sipe, C. L., & Lacoe, J. (2006). Youth organizing, identity-support, and youth development agencies as avenues for involvement. Journal of Community Practice, 14, 235–253. doi:10.1300/J125v14n01_14.
Hansen, D. M., Larson, R. W., & Dworkin, J. B. (2003). What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: A survey of self-reported developmental experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 25–55.
Hardy, S. A., Pratt, M. W., Pancer, S. M., Olsen, J. A., & Lawford, H. L. (2011). Community and religious involvement as contexts of identity change across late adolescence and emerging adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 125–135. doi:10.1177/0165025410375920.
Howe, D., Batchelor, S., & Bochynska, K. (2011). Finding our way: Youth participation in the development and promotion of youth mental health services on the NSW Central Coast. Advances in Mental Health, 10, 20–28.
Jones, J. N., & Deutsch, N. L. (2011). Relational strategies in after-school settings: How staff-youth relationships support positive development. Youth & Society, 43, 1381–1406. doi:10.1177/0044118X10386077.
Jones, K. R., & Perkins, D. F. (2006). Youth and adult perceptions of their relationships within community-based youth programs. Youth & Society, 38, 90–109.
Krauss, S. E., Collura, J., Zeldin, S., Ortega, A., Abdullah, H., & Sulaiman, A. H. (2014). Youth-adult partnership: Exploring contributions to empowerment, agency and community connections in Malaysian youth programs. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43, 1550–1562. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-0027-1.
Larson, R. W., Izenstark, D., Rodriguez G., & Cole Perry, S. (2015). The art of restraint: How experienced program leaders use their authority to support youth agency. Journal of Research on Adolescence. doi:10.1111/jora.12234.
Larson, R., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. (2005). A comparison of youth-driven and adult-driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 57–74.
Lawford, H. L., & Ramey, H. L. (2015). “Now I know I can make a difference”: Generativity and activity engagement as predictors of meaning making in youth. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1395–1406. doi:10.1037/dev0000034.
Lawford, H. L., Ramey, H. L., Rose-Krasnor, L., & Proctor, A. (2012). Predictors of adolescent successful development after an exchange: The importance of activity qualities and youth input. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1381–1391. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.05.008.
Lulow, E., Harrington, K., Alexander, M., & Kendrick Burk, L. (2014). Becoming a youth-guided residential organization. In G. M. Blau, B. Cladwell, & R. E. Lieberman (Eds.), Residential interventions for children, adolescents, and families: A best practice guide (pp. 46–60). NY, New York: Routledge.
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–558.
McIntosh, H., Metz, E., & Youniss, J. (2005). Community service and identity formation in adolescents. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development (pp. 331–351). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mitra, D. L. (2009). Strengthening student voice initiatives in high schools: An examination of the supports needed for school-based youth-adult partnerships. Youth & Society, 40, 311–335. doi:10.1177/0044118X08316211.
Mitra, D., Serriere, S., & Kirshner, B. (2014). Youth participation in U.S. contexts: Student voice without a national mandate. Children & Society, 28, 292–304. doi:10.1111/chso.12005.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2013). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Preacher, K. J. (2002, May). Calculation for the test of the difference between two independent correlation coefficients [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org/corrtest/corrtest.htm.
Ramey, H. L. (2013). Organizational outcomes of youth involvement in organizational decision-making: A synthesis of qualitative research. Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 488–504. doi:10.1002/jcop.21553.
Ramey, H. L., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2015). The New Mentality: Youth-adult partnerships in a community mental health promotion program. Children and Youth Services Review, 50, 28–37. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.01.006.
Roach, J., Wureta, E., & Ross, L. (2013). Dilemmas of practice in the ecology of emancipatory youth-adult partnerships. International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies, 3, 475–488.
Sahay, T. B., Rempel, B., & Lodge, J. (2014). Equipping public health professionals for youth engagement: Lessons learned from a 2-year pilot study. Health Promotion Practice, 15, 28–34. doi:10.1177/1524839912468885.
Saito, R. N., & Sullivan, T. K. (2011). The many faces, features and outcomes of youth engagement. Journal of Youth Development, 6, 109–125.
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147.
Serido, J., Borden, L. M., & Perkins, D. F. (2011). Moving beyond youth voice. Youth & Society, 43, 44–63. doi:10.1177/0044118X09351280.
Serido, J., Borden, L. M., & Wiggs, C. B. (2014). Breaking down potential barriers to continued program participation. Youth & Society, 46, 51–69. doi:10.1177/0044118X11424916.
Smits, I., Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Kunnen, S., & Bosma, H. (2008). The Identity Style Inventory—4: Internal research report. Leuven, Belgium: Catholic University Leuven.
Sullivan, P. J., & Larson, R. W. (2010). Connecting youth to high-resource adults: Lessons from effective youth programs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 99–123. doi:10.1177/0743558409350505.
Waterman, A. S. (2011). Eudaimonic identity theory: Identity as self-discovery. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Lyuckx, V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 357–379). doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_16.
Wong, N. T., Zimmerman, M. A., & Parker, E. A. (2010). A typology of youth participation and empowerment for child and adolescent health promotion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 100–114. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9330-0.
Wood, D., Larson, R. W., & Brown, J. R. (2009). How adolescents come to see themselves as more responsible through participation in youth programs. Child Development, 80, 295–309.
Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Zeldin, S. (2004). Youth as agents of adults and community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged in organizational governance. Applied Developmental Science, 8, 75–90.
Zeldin, Z., Christens, B., & Powers, C. (2013). The psychology and practice of Youth-Adult Partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and community change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 385–397. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9558-y.
Zeldin, S., Gauley, J., Krauss, S. E., Kornbluh, M., & Collura, J. (2015a). Youth–adult partnership and youth civic development: Cross-national analyses for scholars and field professionals. Youth & Society. doi:10.1177/0044118X15595153.
Zeldin, S., Krauss, S. A., Collura, J., Lucchesi, M., & Sulaiman, A. H. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring youth-adult partnership in community programs: A cross national study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54, 337–347. doi:10.1007/s10464-014-9676-9.
Zeldin, S., Krauss, S. E., Kim, T., Collura, J., & Abdullah, H. (2015b). Pathways to youth empowerment and community connectedness: A study of youth-adult partnership in Malaysian after-school, co-curricular programs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0320-2.
This research was supported in part by a scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to the first author and a grant from Humber’s Staff Initiated Research Fund to the first and third authors.
This study was funded by a scholarship to H R from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (award number 752-2009-1597), and a grant from Humber’s Staff Initiated Research Fund to H R and H L (award number 2013‐011).
H R conceived of the study, conducted data collection and analysis, and drafted the manuscript. L R K conceived of the study, participated in the plan and interpretation of the analysis, and participated in drafting the manuscript. H L participated in the design and interpretation of the analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors participated in the design and coordination of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
All authors, declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval for the study was obtained through Brock University and Humber’s Research Ethics Boards. All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All authors, H R , L R K , and H L , affirm that the manuscript is in compliance with the Tri-Council Policy Statement guidelines for ethical conduct of research involving human participants.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
About this article
Cite this article
Ramey, H.L., Rose-Krasnor, L. & Lawford, H.L. Youth–Adult Partnerships and Youth Identity Style. J Youth Adolescence 46, 442–453 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0474-6
- Youth–adult partnerships
- Youth voice
- Organizational context