Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 442–453 | Cite as

Youth–Adult Partnerships and Youth Identity Style

  • Heather L. RameyEmail author
  • Linda Rose-Krasnor
  • Heather L. Lawford
Empirical Research


Youth–adult partnerships (e.g., youth leading programs, participating as members of advisory boards) are a common and widely recommended practice in youth work and youth-serving program settings. Although researchers have suggested that these opportunities contribute to youth’s identity development, empirical evidence is lacking. In the current study, we tested associations between identity style and degree of youth voice, collaborative youth–adult relationships, and youth’s program engagement in 194 youth participating in youth–adult partnerships (M age = 17.6, 62 % female). We found that these characteristics of youth–adult partnerships predicted higher informational identity style, although only program engagement emerged as a unique predictor. Furthermore, exploratory analysis indicated that these associations were moderated by the type of organization. The findings suggest the need for more research on the multiple dimensions of youth–adult partnerships and their association with youth functioning, as well as pointing to the importance of the broader organizational context of youth–adult partnerships.


Youth–adult partnerships Identity Youth voice Engagement Organizational context 



This research was supported in part by a scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to the first author and a grant from Humber’s Staff Initiated Research Fund to the first and third authors.


This study was funded by a scholarship to H R from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (award number 752-2009-1597), and a grant from Humber’s Staff Initiated Research Fund to H R and H L (award number 2013‐011).

Author Contributions

H R conceived of the study, conducted data collection and analysis, and drafted the manuscript. L R K conceived of the study, participated in the plan and interpretation of the analysis, and participated in drafting the manuscript. H L participated in the design and interpretation of the analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors participated in the design and coordination of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

All authors, declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for the study was obtained through Brock University and Humber’s Research Ethics Boards. All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All authors, H R , L R K , and H L , affirm that the manuscript is in compliance with the Tri-Council Policy Statement guidelines for ethical conduct of research involving human participants.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., Jacquelynne, S. Eccles, J. S., & Smith, C. (2013). Youth belonging and cognitive engagement in organized activities: A large-scale field study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34, 208–218. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2013.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., & Smith, C. (2014). Involving youth in program decision-making: How common and what might it do for youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1844–1860. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0183-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Berzonsky, M. D. (2011). Identity processes. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 1, pp. 1363–1369). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Smits, I., Papini, D. R., & Goossens, L. (2013). Development and validation of the revised Identity Style Inventory (ISI-5): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 25, 893–904.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchet-Cohen, N., & Bedeaux, C. (2014). Towards a right-based approach to youth programs: Duty-bearers perspectives in Montreal. Children and Youth Services Review, 38, 75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchet-Cohen, N., & Brunson, L. (2014). Creating settings for youth empowerment and leadership: An ecological perspective. Child and Youth Services, 35, 216–236. doi: 10.1080/0145935X.2014.938735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanchet-Cohen, N. Linds, W., Mann-Feder, V., & Yuen, F. (Eds.) (2013). Transforming practices: Emancipatory approaches to youth engagement. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 3, 320–327.Google Scholar
  9. Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. (2010). Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80, 576–610. doi: 10.3102/0034654310364533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borden, L., & Serido, J. (2009). From program participant to engaged citizen: A developmental journey. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 423–438. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Camino, L., & Zeldin, S. (2002). From periphery to center: Pathways for youth civic engagement in the day-to-day life of communities. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 213–220. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cargo, M., Grams, G. D., Ottoson, J. M., Ward, P., & Green, L. W. (2003). Empowerment as fostering positive youth development and citizenship. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, S66–S79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cater, M. D. W. (2006). How voice affects perceptions of relationship with adults, ownership, and engagement in youth (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College).Google Scholar
  14. Cater, M., Machtmes, K., & Fox, J. (2008). An examination of youth voice via quasi- experimental methodology. Journal of Youth Development, 3(2). Retrieved from
  15. Cater, M., Machtmes, K., & Fox, J. E. (2013). A phenomenological examination of context on adolescent ownership and engagement rationale. The Qualitative Report, 18, 1–13.Google Scholar
  16. Chilenski, S. M., Olson, J. R., Schulte, J. A., Perkins, D. F., & Spoth, R. (2015). A multi-level examination of how the organizational context relates to readiness to implement prevention and evidence-based programming in community settings. Evaluation and Program Planning, 48, 63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.10.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Crocetti, E., Erentaitė, R., & Žukauskienė, R. (2014a). Identity styles, positive youth development, and civic engagement in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1818–1828. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0100-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Crocetti, E., Garckija, R., Gabrialavičiūtė, I., Vosylis, R., & Žukauskienė, R. (2014b). Reciprocal associations between identity and civic engagement in adolescence: A two-wave longitudinal study. International Journal of Developmental Science, 8, 115–124. doi: 10.3233/DEV-1400139.Google Scholar
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  20. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Gambone, M. A., Yu, H. C., Lewis-Charp, M., Sipe, C. L., & Lacoe, J. (2006). Youth organizing, identity-support, and youth development agencies as avenues for involvement. Journal of Community Practice, 14, 235–253. doi: 10.1300/J125v14n01_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen, D. M., Larson, R. W., & Dworkin, J. B. (2003). What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: A survey of self-reported developmental experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hardy, S. A., Pratt, M. W., Pancer, S. M., Olsen, J. A., & Lawford, H. L. (2011). Community and religious involvement as contexts of identity change across late adolescence and emerging adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 125–135. doi: 10.1177/0165025410375920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Howe, D., Batchelor, S., & Bochynska, K. (2011). Finding our way: Youth participation in the development and promotion of youth mental health services on the NSW Central Coast. Advances in Mental Health, 10, 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, J. N., & Deutsch, N. L. (2011). Relational strategies in after-school settings: How staff-youth relationships support positive development. Youth & Society, 43, 1381–1406. doi: 10.1177/0044118X10386077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, K. R., & Perkins, D. F. (2006). Youth and adult perceptions of their relationships within community-based youth programs. Youth & Society, 38, 90–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krauss, S. E., Collura, J., Zeldin, S., Ortega, A., Abdullah, H., & Sulaiman, A. H. (2014). Youth-adult partnership: Exploring contributions to empowerment, agency and community connections in Malaysian youth programs. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43, 1550–1562. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0027-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larson, R. W., Izenstark, D., Rodriguez G., & Cole Perry, S. (2015). The art of restraint: How experienced program leaders use their authority to support youth agency. Journal of Research on Adolescence. doi: 10.1111/jora.12234.
  29. Larson, R., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. (2005). A comparison of youth-driven and adult-driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawford, H. L., & Ramey, H. L. (2015). “Now I know I can make a difference”: Generativity and activity engagement as predictors of meaning making in youth. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1395–1406. doi: 10.1037/dev0000034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawford, H. L., Ramey, H. L., Rose-Krasnor, L., & Proctor, A. (2012). Predictors of adolescent successful development after an exchange: The importance of activity qualities and youth input. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1381–1391. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.05.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lulow, E., Harrington, K., Alexander, M., & Kendrick Burk, L. (2014). Becoming a youth-guided residential organization. In G. M. Blau, B. Cladwell, & R. E. Lieberman (Eds.), Residential interventions for children, adolescents, and families: A best practice guide (pp. 46–60). NY, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McIntosh, H., Metz, E., & Youniss, J. (2005). Community service and identity formation in adolescents. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development (pp. 331–351). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  35. Mitra, D. L. (2009). Strengthening student voice initiatives in high schools: An examination of the supports needed for school-based youth-adult partnerships. Youth & Society, 40, 311–335. doi: 10.1177/0044118X08316211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitra, D., Serriere, S., & Kirshner, B. (2014). Youth participation in U.S. contexts: Student voice without a national mandate. Children & Society, 28, 292–304. doi: 10.1111/chso.12005.Google Scholar
  37. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2013). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  38. Preacher, K. J. (2002, May). Calculation for the test of the difference between two independent correlation coefficients [Computer software].
  39. Ramey, H. L. (2013). Organizational outcomes of youth involvement in organizational decision-making: A synthesis of qualitative research. Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 488–504. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramey, H. L., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2015). The New Mentality: Youth-adult partnerships in a community mental health promotion program. Children and Youth Services Review, 50, 28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roach, J., Wureta, E., & Ross, L. (2013). Dilemmas of practice in the ecology of emancipatory youth-adult partnerships. International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies, 3, 475–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sahay, T. B., Rempel, B., & Lodge, J. (2014). Equipping public health professionals for youth engagement: Lessons learned from a 2-year pilot study. Health Promotion Practice, 15, 28–34. doi: 10.1177/1524839912468885.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Saito, R. N., & Sullivan, T. K. (2011). The many faces, features and outcomes of youth engagement. Journal of Youth Development, 6, 109–125.Google Scholar
  44. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Serido, J., Borden, L. M., & Perkins, D. F. (2011). Moving beyond youth voice. Youth & Society, 43, 44–63. doi: 10.1177/0044118X09351280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Serido, J., Borden, L. M., & Wiggs, C. B. (2014). Breaking down potential barriers to continued program participation. Youth & Society, 46, 51–69. doi: 10.1177/0044118X11424916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smits, I., Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Kunnen, S., & Bosma, H. (2008). The Identity Style Inventory—4: Internal research report. Leuven, Belgium: Catholic University Leuven.Google Scholar
  48. Sullivan, P. J., & Larson, R. W. (2010). Connecting youth to high-resource adults: Lessons from effective youth programs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 99–123. doi: 10.1177/0743558409350505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Waterman, A. S. (2011). Eudaimonic identity theory: Identity as self-discovery. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Lyuckx, V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 357–379). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_16.
  50. Wong, N. T., Zimmerman, M. A., & Parker, E. A. (2010). A typology of youth participation and empowerment for child and adolescent health promotion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 100–114. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9330-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wood, D., Larson, R. W., & Brown, J. R. (2009). How adolescents come to see themselves as more responsible through participation in youth programs. Child Development, 80, 295–309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  53. Zeldin, S. (2004). Youth as agents of adults and community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged in organizational governance. Applied Developmental Science, 8, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zeldin, Z., Christens, B., & Powers, C. (2013). The psychology and practice of Youth-Adult Partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and community change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 385–397. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9558-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zeldin, S., Gauley, J., Krauss, S. E., Kornbluh, M., & Collura, J. (2015a). Youth–adult partnership and youth civic development: Cross-national analyses for scholars and field professionals. Youth & Society. doi: 10.1177/0044118X15595153.
  56. Zeldin, S., Krauss, S. A., Collura, J., Lucchesi, M., & Sulaiman, A. H. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring youth-adult partnership in community programs: A cross national study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54, 337–347. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9676-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zeldin, S., Krauss, S. E., Kim, T., Collura, J., & Abdullah, H. (2015b). Pathways to youth empowerment and community connectedness: A study of youth-adult partnership in Malaysian after-school, co-curricular programs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. doi:  10.1007/s10964-015-0320-2.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather L. Ramey
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Linda Rose-Krasnor
    • 3
  • Heather L. Lawford
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Social and Community ServicesHumber Institute of Technology and Advanced LearningTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Child and Youth StudiesBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyBishop’s UniversitySherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations